Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1727613 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-06 17:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-09-07 09:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] gpio: acpi: work around false-positive -Wstring-overflow warning Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-09-06 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] gpio: acpi: work around false-positive -Wstring-overflow warning Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-09-06 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] gpio: acpi: work around false-positive -Wstring-overflow warning Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-09-06 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] gpio: acpi: work around false-positive -Wstring-overflow warning Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-09-07 01:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] gpio: acpi: work around false-positive -Wstring-overflow warning Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-07 09:00 +0200
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-06 17:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] gpio: acpi: work around false-positive -Wstring-overflow warning |
| Message-ID | <umKKt-3MF-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
gcc-7 notices that the pin_table is an array of 16-bit numbers,
but fails to take the following range check into account:
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c: In function 'acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupt':
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c:206:24: warning: '%02X' directive writing between 2 and 4 bytes into a region of size 3 [-Wformat-overflow=]
sprintf(ev_name, "_%c%02X",
^~~~
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c:206:20: note: directive argument in the range [0, 65535]
sprintf(ev_name, "_%c%02X",
^~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c:206:3: note: 'sprintf' output between 5 and 7 bytes into a destination of size 5
sprintf(ev_name, "_%c%02X",
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
agpio->triggering == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE ? 'E' : 'L',
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
pin);
~~~~
As suggested by Andy, this changes the format string to have a fixed length.
Since modifying the range check did not help, I also opened a bug against
gcc, see link below.
Fixes: 0d1c28a449c6 ("gpiolib-acpi: Add ACPI5 event model support to gpio.")
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9840801/
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82123
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
index 4d2113530735..eb4528c87c0b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupt(struct acpi_resource *ares,
if (pin <= 255) {
char ev_name[5];
- sprintf(ev_name, "_%c%02X",
+ sprintf(ev_name, "_%c%02hhX",
agpio->triggering == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE ? 'E' : 'L',
pin);
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, ev_name, &evt_handle)))
--
2.9.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-06 18:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] gpio: acpi: work around false-positive -Wstring-overflow warning |
| Message-ID | <umKU9-3Qp-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1727613 |
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 17:47 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc-7 notices that the pin_table is an array of 16-bit numbers,
> but fails to take the following range check into account:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c: In function 'acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupt':
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c:206:24: warning: '%02X' directive writing between 2 and 4 bytes into a region of size 3 [-Wformat-overflow=]
> sprintf(ev_name, "_%c%02X",
> ^~~~
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c:206:20: note: directive argument in the range [0, 65535]
> sprintf(ev_name, "_%c%02X",
> ^~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c:206:3: note: 'sprintf' output between 5 and 7 bytes into a destination of size 5
> sprintf(ev_name, "_%c%02X",
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> agpio->triggering == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE ? 'E' : 'L',
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> pin);
> ~~~~
>
> As suggested by Andy, this changes the format string to have a fixed length.
> Since modifying the range check did not help, I also opened a bug against
> gcc, see link below.
The code has
int pin
does changing pin to unsigned int matter?
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
[]
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupt(struct acpi_resource *ares,
>
> if (pin <= 255) {
> char ev_name[5];
> - sprintf(ev_name, "_%c%02X",
> + sprintf(ev_name, "_%c%02hhX",
> agpio->triggering == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE ? 'E' : 'L',
> pin);
> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, ev_name, &evt_handle)))
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-06 22:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <umOEq-6jL-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1727621 |
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 17:47 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> As suggested by Andy, this changes the format string to have a fixed length.
>> Since modifying the range check did not help, I also opened a bug against
>> gcc, see link below.
>
> The code has
>
> int pin
>
> does changing pin to unsigned int matter?
No difference, see also the gcc bugzilla report.
Arnd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-07 01:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] gpio: acpi: work around false-positive -Wstring-overflow warning |
| Message-ID | <umSeZ-dZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1727694 |
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 21:53 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 17:47 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > As suggested by Andy, this changes the format string to have a fixed length. > > > Since modifying the range check did not help, I also opened a bug against > > > gcc, see link below. > > > > The code has > > > > int pin > > > > does changing pin to unsigned int matter? > > No difference, see also the gcc bugzilla report. Perhaps the bug report does not apply here as the function is casting a unsigned int to an int through a pointer when the int could now be negative, the int is tested for < 256 and is then printed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-07 09:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] gpio: acpi: work around false-positive -Wstring-overflow warning |
| Message-ID | <umYX8-4NP-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1727613 |
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 05:47:45PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc-7 notices that the pin_table is an array of 16-bit numbers,
> but fails to take the following range check into account:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c: In function 'acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupt':
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c:206:24: warning: '%02X' directive writing between 2 and 4 bytes into a region of size 3 [-Wformat-overflow=]
> sprintf(ev_name, "_%c%02X",
> ^~~~
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c:206:20: note: directive argument in the range [0, 65535]
> sprintf(ev_name, "_%c%02X",
> ^~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c:206:3: note: 'sprintf' output between 5 and 7 bytes into a destination of size 5
> sprintf(ev_name, "_%c%02X",
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> agpio->triggering == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE ? 'E' : 'L',
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> pin);
> ~~~~
>
> As suggested by Andy, this changes the format string to have a fixed length.
> Since modifying the range check did not help, I also opened a bug against
> gcc, see link below.
>
> Fixes: 0d1c28a449c6 ("gpiolib-acpi: Add ACPI5 event model support to gpio.")
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9840801/
> Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82123
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web