Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1721776 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-08-28 18:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-08-28 18:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 01/16] dt-bindings: i2c: eeprom: Document vendor to be used and deprecated ones Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2017-08-28 18:10 +0200
| From | Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-28 18:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 01/16] dt-bindings: i2c: eeprom: Document vendor to be used and deprecated ones |
| Message-ID | <ujuLU-7II-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 08:54:03PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The at24 driver allows to register I2C EEPROM chips using different vendor > and devices, but the I2C subsystem does not take the vendor into account > when matching using the I2C table since it only has device entries. > > But when matching using an OF table, both the vendor and device has to be > taken into account so the driver defines only a set of compatible strings > using the "atmel" vendor as a generic fallback for compatible I2C devices. > > Document in the Device Tree binding document that this manufacturer should > be used as the generic fallback. Also document the deprecated vendors. > > Suggested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> > Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> > Applied to for-next, thanks!
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web