Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1720970 > unrolled thread

linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

Started byStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
First post2017-08-28 04:20 +0200
Last post2017-08-29 00:10 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-08-28 04:20 +0200
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 00:10 +0200

#1720970 — linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2017-08-28 04:20 +0200
Subjectlinux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree
Message-ID<ujhOG-83h-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Brian,

After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c: In function 'ns_init_module':
drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c:2353:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'nandsim_debugfs_remove' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  nandsim_debugfs_remove(nand);
  ^

Caused by commit

  e8e3edb95ce6 ("mtd: create per-device and module-scope debugfs entries")

interacting with commit

  b974696da1cf ("mtd: nandsim: remove debugfs entries in error path")

from Linus' tree.

I applied the following merge fix patch ... please check.

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 12:13:42 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] fix merge of l2-mtd tree

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c
index 00635fd738f6..1ddf0b73c246 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c
@@ -2350,7 +2350,6 @@ static int __init ns_init_module(void)
         return 0;
 
 err_exit:
-	nandsim_debugfs_remove(nand);
 	free_nandsim(nand);
 	nand_release(nsmtd);
 	for (i = 0;i < ARRAY_SIZE(nand->partitions); ++i)
-- 
2.13.2




-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1722026

FromBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Date2017-08-29 00:10 +0200
Message-ID<ujAoi-2Hj-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1720970
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:19:05PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Brian,

Hi Stephen,

> After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c: In function 'ns_init_module':
> drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c:2353:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'nandsim_debugfs_remove' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   nandsim_debugfs_remove(nand);
>   ^
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   e8e3edb95ce6 ("mtd: create per-device and module-scope debugfs entries")
> 
> interacting with commit
> 
>   b974696da1cf ("mtd: nandsim: remove debugfs entries in error path")
> 
> from Linus' tree.

Yes, this was expected in the divergence between a bugfix merge	for 4.13
vs. a feature change in 4.14. I think Boris has fixed the conflict in
his merges and is uploading that to l2-mtd/master (he's handling MTD for
4.14).

Good to know you catch this too :)

> I applied the following merge fix patch ... please check.
> 
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 12:13:42 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] fix merge of l2-mtd tree
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c
> index 00635fd738f6..1ddf0b73c246 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c
> @@ -2350,7 +2350,6 @@ static int __init ns_init_module(void)
>          return 0;
>  
>  err_exit:
> -	nandsim_debugfs_remove(nand);
>  	free_nandsim(nand);
>  	nand_release(nsmtd);
>  	for (i = 0;i < ARRAY_SIZE(nand->partitions); ++i)

I think this is right, and it matches what Boris is pushing.

Regards,
Brian

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web