Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1718429 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-08-23 16:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-08-24 23:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH] tipc: Fix tipc_sk_reinit handling of -EAGAIN Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> - 2017-08-23 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tipc: Fix tipc_sk_reinit handling of -EAGAIN Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2017-08-24 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tipc: Fix tipc_sk_reinit handling of -EAGAIN David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-08-24 23:10 +0200
| From | Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-23 16:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] tipc: Fix tipc_sk_reinit handling of -EAGAIN |
| Message-ID | <uhF8K-1Mw-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi,
In 9dbbfb0ab6680c6a85609041011484e6658e7d3c function tipc_sk_reinit
had additional logic added to loop in the event that function
rhashtable_walk_next() returned -EAGAIN. No worries.
However, if rhashtable_walk_start returns -EAGAIN, it does "continue",
and therefore skips the call to rhashtable_walk_stop(). That has
the effect of calling rcu_read_lock() without its paired call to
rcu_read_unlock(). Since rcu_read_lock() may be nested, the problem
may not be apparent for a while, especially since resize events may
be rare. But the comments to rhashtable_walk_start() state:
* ...Note that we take the RCU lock in all
* cases including when we return an error. So you must always call
* rhashtable_walk_stop to clean up.
This patch replaces the continue with a goto and label to ensure a
matching call to rhashtable_walk_stop().
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/net/tipc/socket.c b/net/tipc/socket.c
index 101e3597338f..d50edd6e0019 100644
--- a/net/tipc/socket.c
+++ b/net/tipc/socket.c
@@ -2255,8 +2255,8 @@ void tipc_sk_reinit(struct net *net)
do {
tsk = ERR_PTR(rhashtable_walk_start(&iter));
- if (tsk)
- continue;
+ if (IS_ERR(tsk))
+ goto walk_stop;
while ((tsk = rhashtable_walk_next(&iter)) && !IS_ERR(tsk)) {
spin_lock_bh(&tsk->sk.sk_lock.slock);
@@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ void tipc_sk_reinit(struct net *net)
msg_set_orignode(msg, tn->own_addr);
spin_unlock_bh(&tsk->sk.sk_lock.slock);
}
-
+walk_stop:
rhashtable_walk_stop(&iter);
} while (tsk == ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN));
}
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-24 15:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ui0db-742-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1718429 |
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:43:02AM -0400, Bob Peterson wrote: > Hi, > > In 9dbbfb0ab6680c6a85609041011484e6658e7d3c function tipc_sk_reinit > had additional logic added to loop in the event that function > rhashtable_walk_next() returned -EAGAIN. No worries. > > However, if rhashtable_walk_start returns -EAGAIN, it does "continue", > and therefore skips the call to rhashtable_walk_stop(). That has > the effect of calling rcu_read_lock() without its paired call to > rcu_read_unlock(). Since rcu_read_lock() may be nested, the problem > may not be apparent for a while, especially since resize events may > be rare. But the comments to rhashtable_walk_start() state: > > * ...Note that we take the RCU lock in all > * cases including when we return an error. So you must always call > * rhashtable_walk_stop to clean up. > > This patch replaces the continue with a goto and label to ensure a > matching call to rhashtable_walk_stop(). > > Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Thanks for catching this! -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-24 23:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ui7y2-3iu-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1718429 |
From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 10:43:02 -0400 (EDT) > In 9dbbfb0ab6680c6a85609041011484e6658e7d3c function tipc_sk_reinit > had additional logic added to loop in the event that function > rhashtable_walk_next() returned -EAGAIN. No worries. > > However, if rhashtable_walk_start returns -EAGAIN, it does "continue", > and therefore skips the call to rhashtable_walk_stop(). That has > the effect of calling rcu_read_lock() without its paired call to > rcu_read_unlock(). Since rcu_read_lock() may be nested, the problem > may not be apparent for a while, especially since resize events may > be rare. But the comments to rhashtable_walk_start() state: > > * ...Note that we take the RCU lock in all > * cases including when we return an error. So you must always call > * rhashtable_walk_stop to clean up. > > This patch replaces the continue with a goto and label to ensure a > matching call to rhashtable_walk_stop(). > > Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web