Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1712297 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v4 resend 1/2] rtmutex: update rt-mutex-design

Started bySteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
First post2017-08-15 18:10 +0200
Last post2017-08-24 21:50 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v4 resend 1/2] rtmutex: update rt-mutex-design Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-08-15 18:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v4 resend 1/2] rtmutex: update rt-mutex-design Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2017-08-24 21:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v4 resend 1/2] rtmutex: update rt-mutex-design Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-08-24 21:50 +0200

#1712297 — Re: [PATCH v4 resend 1/2] rtmutex: update rt-mutex-design

FromSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date2017-08-15 18:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 resend 1/2] rtmutex: update rt-mutex-design
Message-ID<ueMzM-3tO-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:47:14 +0800
Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 08/08/2017 04:30 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 09:53:01 +0800
> > Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> wrote:
> >   
> >> On 07/31/2017 09:50 AM, Alex Shi wrote:  
> >>> -Reviewers:  Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Thomas Duetsch, and Randy Dunlap
> >>> +Original Reviewers:  Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Thomas Duetsch, and
> >>> +		     Randy Dunlap
> >>> +Update (7/6/2017) Reviewers: Steven Rostedt and Sebastian Siewior
> >>>      
> >>
> >> Hi Peter&Ingo,
> >>
> >> This patch had been reviewed and acked by Sebastian and Steven. Do you
> >> still need a official 'reviewed-by' from them?  
> > 
> > Given this, I've been assuming that these changes aren't meant to go
> > through the docs tree; let me know if I should pick them up instead.
> >   
> 
> Hi Jon,
> 
> Sorry for skip you here. Yes, if you like to pick them, please go ahead!
> 
> 

Agreed, Jon's tree is the best path.

-- Steve

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1719526

FromJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Date2017-08-24 21:40 +0200
Message-ID<ui68W-2ff-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1712297
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 12:00:25 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> > Sorry for skip you here. Yes, if you like to pick them, please go ahead!
> 
> Agreed, Jon's tree is the best path.

So I'm kind of slow, but I finally applied these, sorry for the delay.

jon

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1719530

FromSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date2017-08-24 21:50 +0200
Message-ID<ui6iC-2kS-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1719526
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 13:39:14 -0600
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 12:00:25 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> 
> > > Sorry for skip you here. Yes, if you like to pick them, please go ahead!  
> > 
> > Agreed, Jon's tree is the best path.  
> 
> So I'm kind of slow, but I finally applied these, sorry for the delay.
> 

No problem. Thanks a lot Jon!

-- Steve

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web