Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1718934 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-08-24 09:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-08-24 10:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
linux-next: build warnings after merge of the akpm-current tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-08-24 09:50 +0200
Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the akpm-current tree Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com> - 2017-08-24 10:30 +0200
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-24 09:50 +0200 |
| Subject | linux-next: build warnings after merge of the akpm-current tree |
| Message-ID | <uhV3P-3x1-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced these warnings:
fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c: In function 'dlm_free_dead_locks':
fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c:2306:6: warning: unused variable 'i' [-Wunused-variable]
int i;
^
fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c:2305:20: warning: unused variable 'queue' [-Wunused-variable]
struct list_head *queue = NULL;
^
Caused by commit
d09f2c6cf3b8 ("ocfs2: re-queue AST or BAST if sending is failed to improve the reliability")
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-24 10:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uhVGA-405-67@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1718934 |
Hi Andrew,
On 2017/8/24 15:42, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew, After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next
> build (x86_64 allmodconfig) produced these warnings:
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c: In function 'dlm_free_dead_locks':
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c:2306:6: warning: unused variable 'i'
> [-Wunused-variable] int i; ^ fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c:2305:20:
> warning: unused variable 'queue' [-Wunused-variable] struct list_head
> *queue = NULL; ^
My patch never defines these two variables, it's strange that they are
defined within the patch you collected.
Could you please help to check if this patch comes from mail '[PATCH]
ocfs2: re-queue AST or BAST if sending is failed to improve the
reliability' sent on 7, August.
Thanks,
Changwei
> Caused by commit
>
> d09f2c6cf3b8 ("ocfs2: re-queue AST or BAST if sending is failed to improve the reliability")
>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web