Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1718746 > unrolled thread

linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with Linus' tree

Started byStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
First post2017-08-24 03:20 +0200
Last post2017-08-24 09:50 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with  Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-08-24 03:20 +0200
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with  Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-08-24 03:40 +0200
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with Linus' tree Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> - 2017-08-24 09:50 +0200

#1718746 — linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with Linus' tree

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2017-08-24 03:20 +0200
Subjectlinux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with Linus' tree
Message-ID<uhOYp-84n-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi all,

As expetced, today's linux-next merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree
got a conflict in:

  drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-nvm-parse.c

between commit:

  92b0f7b26b31 ("iwlwifi: split the regulatory rules when the bandwidth flags require it")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  b823cf3bae81 ("iwlwifi: update channel flags parser")

from the wireless-drivers-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below - Luca, Kalle, thanks for the heads up) and
can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-nvm-parse.c
index 3ee6767392b6,aa382f719988..000000000000
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-nvm-parse.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-nvm-parse.c
@@@ -864,11 -908,11 +911,11 @@@ iwl_parse_nvm_mcc_info(struct device *d
  		rule->flags |= NL80211_RRF_AUTO_BW;
  		rule->freq_range.max_bandwidth_khz = 0;
  
 -		prev_ch_flags = ch_flags;
  		prev_center_freq = center_freq;
 +		prev_reg_rule_flags = reg_rule_flags;
  
  		IWL_DEBUG_DEV(dev, IWL_DL_LAR,
- 			      "Ch. %d [%sGHz] %s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s(0x%02x) reg_flags 0x%x: %s\n",
 -			      "Ch. %d [%sGHz] %s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s(0x%02x): %s\n",
++			      "Ch. %d [%sGHz] %s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s(0x%02x) reg_flags 0x%x: %s\n"
  			      center_freq,
  			      band == NL80211_BAND_5GHZ ? "5.2" : "2.4",
  			      CHECK_AND_PRINT_I(VALID),
@@@ -878,9 -926,8 +929,8 @@@
  			      CHECK_AND_PRINT_I(40MHZ),
  			      CHECK_AND_PRINT_I(80MHZ),
  			      CHECK_AND_PRINT_I(160MHZ),
- 			      CHECK_AND_PRINT_I(INDOOR_ONLY),
- 			      CHECK_AND_PRINT_I(GO_CONCURRENT),
+ 			      CHECK_AND_PRINT_I(DC_HIGH),
 -			      ch_flags,
 +			      ch_flags, reg_rule_flags,
  			      ((ch_flags & NVM_CHANNEL_ACTIVE) &&
  			       !(ch_flags & NVM_CHANNEL_RADAR))
  					 ? "Ad-Hoc" : "");

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1718754

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2017-08-24 03:40 +0200
Message-ID<uhPhL-8aO-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1718746
Hi all,

On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 11:17:53 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
>   		IWL_DEBUG_DEV(dev, IWL_DL_LAR,
> - 			      "Ch. %d [%sGHz] %s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s(0x%02x) reg_flags 0x%x: %s\n",
>  -			      "Ch. %d [%sGHz] %s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s(0x%02x): %s\n",
> ++			      "Ch. %d [%sGHz] %s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s(0x%02x) reg_flags 0x%x: %s\n"

Rats! I missed the comma ... I have added it back.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1718932 — Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with Linus' tree

FromKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Date2017-08-24 09:50 +0200
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with Linus' tree
Message-ID<uhV3P-3x1-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1718746
(Adding Dave so that he is also aware of this)

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> writes:

> As expetced, today's linux-next merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree
> got a conflict in:
>
>   drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-nvm-parse.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   92b0f7b26b31 ("iwlwifi: split the regulatory rules when the bandwidth flags require it")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
>   b823cf3bae81 ("iwlwifi: update channel flags parser")
>
> from the wireless-drivers-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below - Luca, Kalle, thanks for the heads up) and
> can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

Thanks for the report. There were quite a few conflicts in iwlwifi so
I'm planning to merge wireless-drivers to wireless-drivers-next today so
that the conflicts are fixed before I submit them to Dave.

-- 
Kalle Valo

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web