Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1716831 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-08-21 22:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-08-21 22:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: move definitions to fix !CONFIG_SMP Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-08-21 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: move definitions to fix !CONFIG_SMP Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> - 2017-08-21 22:50 +0200
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-21 22:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: move definitions to fix !CONFIG_SMP |
| Message-ID | <uh1bj-tH-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 04:03:05PM -0400, josef@toxicpanda.com wrote: > From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> > > The series of patches adding runnable_avg and subsequent supporting > patches broke on !CONFIG_SMP. Fix this by moving the definitions under > the appropriate checks, and moving the !CONFIG_SMP definitions higher > up. Is this on top or can I fold this in somewhere? I was meaning to rework the series to avoid this superfluous build borkage.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-21 22:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uh1O2-GL-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1716831 |
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:06:53PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 04:03:05PM -0400, josef@toxicpanda.com wrote: > > From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> > > > > The series of patches adding runnable_avg and subsequent supporting > > patches broke on !CONFIG_SMP. Fix this by moving the definitions under > > the appropriate checks, and moving the !CONFIG_SMP definitions higher > > up. > > Is this on top or can I fold this in somewhere? I was meaning to rework > the series to avoid this superfluous build borkage. There's actually a lot of individual breakages. I can go through and make individual patches that can be folded in to where they were introduced, or I can do them all at once. There's breakage around !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED as well, basically everything you added needs to be moved around some. I'll do whatever is most convenient for you. Thanks, Josef
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web