Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1716561 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH V4 net-next] net: hns3: Add support to change MTU in HNS3 hardware

Started byLeon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
First post2017-08-21 16:50 +0200
Last post2017-08-21 17:00 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH V4 net-next] net: hns3: Add support to change MTU in HNS3  hardware Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> - 2017-08-21 16:50 +0200
    RE: [PATCH V4 net-next] net: hns3: Add support to change MTU in  HNS3 hardware Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com> - 2017-08-21 17:00 +0200

#1716561 — Re: [PATCH V4 net-next] net: hns3: Add support to change MTU in HNS3 hardware

FromLeon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Date2017-08-21 16:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH V4 net-next] net: hns3: Add support to change MTU in HNS3 hardware
Message-ID<ugWbE-5BL-5@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 03:40:03PM +0100, Salil Mehta wrote:
> This patch adds the following support to the HNS3 driver:
> 1. Support to change the Maximum Transmission Unit of a
>    port in the HNS NIC hardware.
> 2. Initializes the supported MTU range for the netdevice.
>
> Signed-off-by: lipeng <lipeng321@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
> ---
> PATCH V4: Addressed some minor comments Leon Romanovsky
>           1. https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/21/212
> PATCH V3: Addressed some minor comments Leon Romanovsky
>           1. https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/20/27
> PATCH V2: Addresses comments given by Andrew Lunn
>           1. https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/18/282
> PATCH V1: Initial Submit
> ---
>  .../net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hns3_enet.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  .../net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hns3_enet.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
>

Wrong error code is not "minor" comment.

Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1716573 — RE: [PATCH V4 net-next] net: hns3: Add support to change MTU in HNS3 hardware

FromSalil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
Date2017-08-21 17:00 +0200
SubjectRE: [PATCH V4 net-next] net: hns3: Add support to change MTU in HNS3 hardware
Message-ID<ugWlj-5F5-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1716561
Hi Leon,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leon Romanovsky [mailto:leon@kernel.org]
> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 3:49 PM
> To: Salil Mehta
> Cc: davem@davemloft.net; Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen); lipeng (Y);
> mehta.salil.lnk@gmail.com; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; Linuxarm
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 net-next] net: hns3: Add support to change MTU
> in HNS3 hardware
> 
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 03:40:03PM +0100, Salil Mehta wrote:
> > This patch adds the following support to the HNS3 driver:
> > 1. Support to change the Maximum Transmission Unit of a
> >    port in the HNS NIC hardware.
> > 2. Initializes the supported MTU range for the netdevice.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: lipeng <lipeng321@huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > PATCH V4: Addressed some minor comments Leon Romanovsky
> >           1. https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/21/212
> > PATCH V3: Addressed some minor comments Leon Romanovsky
> >           1. https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/20/27
> > PATCH V2: Addresses comments given by Andrew Lunn
> >           1. https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/18/282
> > PATCH V1: Initial Submit
> > ---
> >  .../net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hns3_enet.c | 34
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hns3_enet.h |  1 +
> >  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
> >
> 
> Wrong error code is not "minor" comment.
Sorry for the wrong terminology used. Both of the comments
were definitely useful and I have taken into consideration
both of them in my recent patch. I think I missed it while
replying, saw it while and created the patch later.
Sorry for that again.

I will correct this in my subsequent patch.

Best regards
Salil
> 
> Thanks,
> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web