Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1716342 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-08-21 13:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-08-21 15:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 11/16] arm64: zynqmp: Add generic compatible string for I2C EEPROM Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> - 2017-08-21 13:30 +0200
Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 11/16] arm64: zynqmp: Add generic compatible string for I2C EEPROM Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> - 2017-08-21 15:00 +0200
| From | Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-21 13:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 11/16] arm64: zynqmp: Add generic compatible string for I2C EEPROM |
| Message-ID | <ugT45-3KY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[snip]
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-ep108.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-ep108.dts
>> index ef1b9e573af0..53907b7a7fd9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-ep108.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-ep108.dts
>> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
>> status = "okay";
>> clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> eeprom@54 {
>> - compatible = "at,24c64";
>> + compatible = "atmel,24c64";
>> reg = <0x54>;
>> };
>> };
>> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
>> status = "okay";
>> clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> eeprom@55 {
>> - compatible = "at,24c64";
>> + compatible = "atmel,24c64";
>> reg = <0x55>;
>> };
>> };
>>
>
> Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
>
Any reasons why this patch was never picked? It was acked two months ago.
Best regards,
Javier
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-21 15:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ugUtc-4t7-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1716342 |
Hello Michal,
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> wrote:
> On 21.8.2017 13:27, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-ep108.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-ep108.dts
>>>> index ef1b9e573af0..53907b7a7fd9 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-ep108.dts
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-ep108.dts
>>>> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
>>>> status = "okay";
>>>> clock-frequency = <400000>;
>>>> eeprom@54 {
>>>> - compatible = "at,24c64";
>>>> + compatible = "atmel,24c64";
>>>> reg = <0x54>;
>>>> };
>>>> };
>>>> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
>>>> status = "okay";
>>>> clock-frequency = <400000>;
>>>> eeprom@55 {
>>>> - compatible = "at,24c64";
>>>> + compatible = "atmel,24c64";
>>>> reg = <0x55>;
>>>> };
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
>>>
>>
>> Any reasons why this patch was never picked? It was acked two months ago.
>
> Normally when you send series then it should be applied as the whole
> series not just one piece of that.
>
Right, I mentioned in the cover letter that the patches could be
applied independently. Sorry for the confusion.
> Anyway I see that changes are applied and this one is missing that's why
> I will add to zynqmp/dt branch and going to send pull request today.
>
Great, thanks a lot for your help.
> Thanks,
> Michal
Best regards,
Javier
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web