Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1714351 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] Adding support of RLIMIT_CPUNS

Started byAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
First post2017-08-17 22:00 +0200
Last post2017-08-17 22:00 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] Adding support of RLIMIT_CPUNS Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-08-17 22:00 +0200

#1714351 — Re: [PATCH] Adding support of RLIMIT_CPUNS

FromAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date2017-08-17 22:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Adding support of RLIMIT_CPUNS
Message-ID<ufz7s-10m-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 22:45:45 +0300 ________________ ________________ <grikukan@mail.ru> wrote:

> To set time limit for process now we can use RLIMIT_CPU.
> However, it has precision up to one second and it can be
> too big for some purposes.
> 
> This patch adds support of RLIMIT_CPUNS, which works 
> almost as RLIMIT_CPU, but has nanosecond precision.
> 
> At the moment, RLIMIT_CPU and RLIMIT_CPUNS are two
> independent values, because I don't see any nice way
> for them to be together.

We'll need to hear much, much more about "for some purposes", please. 
What are the use cases, why are they important, who will benefit from
this and in what ways, etc?  How will this change benefit our users?

Presenting this material is critical, so please spend time over it.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web