Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1714734 > unrolled thread

Re: [patch-rt] locking, rwlock-rt: do not save state multiple times in __write_rt_lock()

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [patch-rt] locking, rwlock-rt: do not save state multiple times  in __write_rt_lock() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200

#1714734 — Re: [patch-rt] locking, rwlock-rt: do not save state multiple times in __write_rt_lock()

On 2017-08-09 14:04:48 [+0200], Mike Galbraith wrote:
> 
> Save state prior to entering the acquisition loop, otherwise we may
> initially see readers, but upon releasing ->wait_lock see none, loop
> back around, and having not slept, save TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE.
> 
> Signed-off-by_ Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>

applied but

> ---
>  kernel/locking/rwlock-rt.c |   37 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/kernel/locking/rwlock-rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rwlock-rt.c
> @@ -190,30 +190,33 @@ void __sched __write_rt_lock(struct rt_r
…
>  
> +	for (;;) {
>  		/* Have all readers left the critical region? */
> -		if (!atomic_read(&lock->readers)) {
> -			atomic_set(&lock->readers, WRITER_BIAS);
> -			raw_spin_lock(&self->pi_lock);
> -			__set_current_state_no_track(self->saved_state);
> -			self->saved_state = TASK_RUNNING;
> -			raw_spin_unlock(&self->pi_lock);
> -			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->wait_lock, flags);
> -			return;

I kept this part where it is so the diff is smaller.

> -		}
> +		if (!atomic_read(&lock->readers))
> +			break;
>  }
>  
>  int __write_rt_trylock(struct rt_rw_lock *lock)

Sebastian

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web