Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1714693 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-08-18 10:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 25 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH v2 00/12] genirq/irqchip: Effective affinity fixups Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-08-18 10:40 +0200
[PATCH v2 05/12] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Report that effective affinity is a single target Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-08-18 10:40 +0200
[tip:irq/core] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Report that effective affinity is a single target tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200
[PATCH v2 04/12] irqchip/gic-v3: Report that effective affinity is a single target Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-08-18 10:40 +0200
[tip:irq/core] irqchip/gic-v3: Report that effective affinity is a single target tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200
[PATCH v2 02/12] genirq/proc: Use the the accessor to report the effective affinity Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-08-18 10:40 +0200
[tip:irq/core] genirq/proc: Use the the accessor to report the effective affinity tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200
[PATCH v2 11/12] irqchip/mips-gic: Report that effective affinity is a single target Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-08-18 10:50 +0200
[tip:irq/core] irqchip/mips-gic: Report that effective affinity is a single target tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200
[PATCH v2 09/12] irqchip/metag-ext: Report that effective affinity is a single target Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-08-18 10:50 +0200
[tip:irq/core] irqchip/metag-ext: Report that effective affinity is a single target tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200
[PATCH v2 07/12] irqchip/bcm-6345-l1: Report that effective affinity is a single target Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-08-18 10:50 +0200
[tip:irq/core] irqchip/bcm-6345-l1: Report that effective affinity is a single target tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200
[PATCH v2 01/12] genirq: Restrict effective affinity to interrupts actually using it Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-08-18 10:50 +0200
[tip:irq/core] genirq: Restrict effective affinity to interrupts actually using it tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200
[PATCH v2 03/12] irqchip/gic: Report that effective affinity is a single target Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-08-18 10:50 +0200
[tip:irq/core] irqchip/gic: Report that effective affinity is a single target tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200
[PATCH v2 10/12] irqchip/hip04: Report that effective affinity is a single target Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-08-18 10:50 +0200
[tip:irq/core] irqchip/hip04: Report that effective affinity is a single target tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200
[PATCH v2 12/12] irqchip/xtensa-mx: Report that effective affinity is a single target Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-08-18 10:50 +0200
[tip:irq/core] irqchip/xtensa-mx: Report that effective affinity is a single target tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200
[PATCH v2 08/12] irqchip/bcm-7038-l1: Report that effective affinity is a single target Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-08-18 10:50 +0200
[tip:irq/core] irqchip/bcm-7038-l1: Report that effective affinity is a single target tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200
[PATCH v2 06/12] irqchip/armada-370-xp: Report that effective affinity is a single target Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-08-18 10:50 +0200
[tip:irq/core] irqchip/armada-370-xp: Report that effective affinity is a single target tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 10:40 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 00/12] genirq/irqchip: Effective affinity fixups |
| Message-ID | <ufKYV-Zv-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
4.13 contains a number of updates to the core IRQ code to deal with
things like the effective affinity. This series attempts to fix a
number of small things that are now breaking:
1) The core code assumes that CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK
being defined implies that *all* interrupts have an effective
affinity, while it may not be the case (I may have compiled in an
irqchip driver that has this property, yet none of my interrupts are
routed through it).
2) A large number of our irqchips are effectively single target (they
will pick one CPU in the affinity list), and yet do not update the
effective affinity cpumask.
(1) is solved by checking that the interrupt has a non-empty effective
affinity mask when reporting it, and use the notional affinity mask
instead if the effective one is empty.
(2) is just a matter of updating the effective affinity when required,
and to mark the interrupts as "single target". I've kept them separate
so that people can directly pick the irqchip they are interested in,
but these 10 patches could as well be squashed into a single one.
I've lightly tested the ARM GIC stuff, and that's it. I'd appreciate
some feedback from the platform maintainers, specially for the more
exotic architectures such as metag and xtensa.
Thanks,
M.
* From v1:
- Don't assume that an interrupt not being single-target means that
it doesn't use the effective affinity, and check the full mask
instead (Thomas Gleixner)
- Fix MIPS GIC patch, where the affinity registered was the notional
one instead of the effective one (Paul Burton)
Marc Zyngier (12):
genirq: Restrict effective affinity to interrupts actually using it
genirq/proc: Use the the accessor to report the effective affinity
irqchip/gic: Report that effective affinity is a single target
irqchip/gic-v3: Report that effective affinity is a single target
irqchip/gic-v3-its: Report that effective affinity is a single target
irqchip/armada-370-xp: Report that effective affinity is a single
target
irqchip/bcm-6345-l1: Report that effective affinity is a single target
irqchip/bcm-7038-l1: Report that effective affinity is a single target
irqchip/metag-ext: Report that effective affinity is a single target
irqchip/hip04: Report that effective affinity is a single target
irqchip/mips-gic: Report that effective affinity is a single target
irqchip/xtensa-mx: Report that effective affinity is a single target
arch/arm/mach-hisi/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/metag/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
drivers/irqchip/irq-armada-370-xp.c | 3 +++
drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c | 3 +++
drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c | 3 +++
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 7 ++++++-
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 3 +++
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 3 +++
drivers/irqchip/irq-hip04.c | 3 +++
drivers/irqchip/irq-metag-ext.c | 4 ++++
drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c | 10 +++++++---
drivers/irqchip/irq-xtensa-mx.c | 6 +++++-
include/linux/irq.h | 5 ++++-
kernel/irq/proc.c | 2 +-
15 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--
2.11.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 10:40 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 05/12] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Report that effective affinity is a single target |
| Message-ID | <ufKYV-Zv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714693 |
The GICv3 ITS driver only targets a single CPU at a time, even if
the notional affinity is wider. Let's inform the core code
about this.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index 68932873eebc..22e228500357 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -649,6 +649,7 @@ static int its_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
target_col = &its_dev->its->collections[cpu];
its_send_movi(its_dev, target_col, id);
its_dev->event_map.col_map[id] = cpu;
+ irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
}
return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
@@ -1481,6 +1482,7 @@ static int its_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq + i,
hwirq, &its_irq_chip, its_dev);
+ irqd_set_single_target(irq_desc_get_irq_data(irq_to_desc(virq + i)));
pr_debug("ID:%d pID:%d vID:%d\n",
(int)(hwirq - its_dev->event_map.lpi_base),
(int) hwirq, virq + i);
@@ -1495,13 +1497,16 @@ static void its_irq_domain_activate(struct irq_domain *domain,
struct its_device *its_dev = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
u32 event = its_get_event_id(d);
const struct cpumask *cpu_mask = cpu_online_mask;
+ int cpu;
/* get the cpu_mask of local node */
if (its_dev->its->numa_node >= 0)
cpu_mask = cpumask_of_node(its_dev->its->numa_node);
/* Bind the LPI to the first possible CPU */
- its_dev->event_map.col_map[event] = cpumask_first(cpu_mask);
+ cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_mask);
+ its_dev->event_map.col_map[event] = cpu;
+ irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
/* Map the GIC IRQ and event to the device */
its_send_mapti(its_dev, d->hwirq, event);
--
2.11.0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [tip:irq/core] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Report that effective affinity is a single target |
| Message-ID | <ufLrY-1qM-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714694 |
Commit-ID: 0d224d3508f5ba67438b921fc37cf179c9652f20
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/0d224d3508f5ba67438b921fc37cf179c9652f20
Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:39:18 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:54:40 +0200
irqchip/gic-v3-its: Report that effective affinity is a single target
The GICv3 ITS driver only targets a single CPU at a time, even if
the notional affinity is wider. Let's inform the core code
about this.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Cc: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>
Cc: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com>
Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170818083925.10108-6-marc.zyngier@arm.com
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index 6893287..22e2285 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -649,6 +649,7 @@ static int its_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
target_col = &its_dev->its->collections[cpu];
its_send_movi(its_dev, target_col, id);
its_dev->event_map.col_map[id] = cpu;
+ irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
}
return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
@@ -1481,6 +1482,7 @@ static int its_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq + i,
hwirq, &its_irq_chip, its_dev);
+ irqd_set_single_target(irq_desc_get_irq_data(irq_to_desc(virq + i)));
pr_debug("ID:%d pID:%d vID:%d\n",
(int)(hwirq - its_dev->event_map.lpi_base),
(int) hwirq, virq + i);
@@ -1495,13 +1497,16 @@ static void its_irq_domain_activate(struct irq_domain *domain,
struct its_device *its_dev = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
u32 event = its_get_event_id(d);
const struct cpumask *cpu_mask = cpu_online_mask;
+ int cpu;
/* get the cpu_mask of local node */
if (its_dev->its->numa_node >= 0)
cpu_mask = cpumask_of_node(its_dev->its->numa_node);
/* Bind the LPI to the first possible CPU */
- its_dev->event_map.col_map[event] = cpumask_first(cpu_mask);
+ cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_mask);
+ its_dev->event_map.col_map[event] = cpu;
+ irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
/* Map the GIC IRQ and event to the device */
its_send_mapti(its_dev, d->hwirq, event);
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 10:40 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 04/12] irqchip/gic-v3: Report that effective affinity is a single target |
| Message-ID | <ufKYW-Zv-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714693 |
The GICv3 driver only targets a single CPU at a time, even if
the notional affinity is wider. Let's inform the core code
about this.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
index 586929d072ca..ce99c1ee6c7d 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ config ARM_GIC_V3
select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
select PARTITION_PERCPU
+ select GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK
config ARM_GIC_V3_ITS
bool
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index dbffb7ab6203..511c290c4a26 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -670,6 +670,8 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
else
gic_dist_wait_for_rwp();
+ irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
+
return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
}
#else
@@ -768,6 +770,7 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
irq_domain_set_info(d, irq, hw, chip, d->host_data,
handle_fasteoi_irq, NULL, NULL);
irq_set_probe(irq);
+ irqd_set_single_target(irq_desc_get_irq_data(irq_to_desc(irq)));
}
/* LPIs */
if (hw >= 8192 && hw < GIC_ID_NR) {
--
2.11.0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [tip:irq/core] irqchip/gic-v3: Report that effective affinity is a single target |
| Message-ID | <ufLrX-1qM-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714697 |
Commit-ID: 956ae91ae8761f2cd8cd7b8d6cb90fd4d0b8a596
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/956ae91ae8761f2cd8cd7b8d6cb90fd4d0b8a596
Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:39:17 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:54:40 +0200
irqchip/gic-v3: Report that effective affinity is a single target
The GICv3 driver only targets a single CPU at a time, even if
the notional affinity is wider. Let's inform the core code
about this.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Cc: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>
Cc: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com>
Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170818083925.10108-5-marc.zyngier@arm.com
---
drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
index 586929d..ce99c1e 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ config ARM_GIC_V3
select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
select PARTITION_PERCPU
+ select GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK
config ARM_GIC_V3_ITS
bool
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index dbffb7a..511c290 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -670,6 +670,8 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
else
gic_dist_wait_for_rwp();
+ irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
+
return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
}
#else
@@ -768,6 +770,7 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
irq_domain_set_info(d, irq, hw, chip, d->host_data,
handle_fasteoi_irq, NULL, NULL);
irq_set_probe(irq);
+ irqd_set_single_target(irq_desc_get_irq_data(irq_to_desc(irq)));
}
/* LPIs */
if (hw >= 8192 && hw < GIC_ID_NR) {
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 10:40 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 02/12] genirq/proc: Use the the accessor to report the effective affinity |
| Message-ID | <ufKYX-Zv-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714693 |
If CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK is defined, but that the interrupt is not single target, the effective affinity reported in /proc/irq/x/effective_affinity will be empty, which is not the truth. Instead, use the accessor to report the affinity, which will pick the right mask. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> --- kernel/irq/proc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/irq/proc.c b/kernel/irq/proc.c index 7f9642a1e267..0534781724d0 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/proc.c +++ b/kernel/irq/proc.c @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int show_irq_affinity(int type, struct seq_file *m) case EFFECTIVE: case EFFECTIVE_LIST: #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK - mask = desc->irq_common_data.effective_affinity; + mask = irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(&desc->irq_data); break; #else return -EINVAL; -- 2.11.0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [tip:irq/core] genirq/proc: Use the the accessor to report the effective affinity |
| Message-ID | <ufLrZ-1qM-47@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714701 |
Commit-ID: 6bc6d4abd22e890cf69a05554fa8f8f83f351515 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/6bc6d4abd22e890cf69a05554fa8f8f83f351515 Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> AuthorDate: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:39:15 +0100 Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> CommitDate: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:54:39 +0200 genirq/proc: Use the the accessor to report the effective affinity If CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK is defined, but that the interrupt is not single target, the effective affinity reported in /proc/irq/x/effective_affinity will be empty, which is not the truth. Instead, use the accessor to report the affinity, which will pick the right mask. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com> Cc: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Cc: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170818083925.10108-3-marc.zyngier@arm.com --- kernel/irq/proc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/irq/proc.c b/kernel/irq/proc.c index 7f9642a..0534781 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/proc.c +++ b/kernel/irq/proc.c @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int show_irq_affinity(int type, struct seq_file *m) case EFFECTIVE: case EFFECTIVE_LIST: #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK - mask = desc->irq_common_data.effective_affinity; + mask = irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(&desc->irq_data); break; #else return -EINVAL;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 10:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 11/12] irqchip/mips-gic: Report that effective affinity is a single target |
| Message-ID | <ufL8B-13v-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714693 |
The MIPS GIC driver only targets a single CPU at a time, even if the notional affinity is wider. Let's inform the core code about this. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> --- drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c | 10 +++++++--- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig index 39bfa5b25b54..bca9a88012f0 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ config IRQ_MIPS_CPU select GENERIC_IRQ_IPI if SYS_SUPPORTS_MULTITHREADING select IRQ_DOMAIN select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY if GENERIC_IRQ_IPI + select GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK config CLPS711X_IRQCHIP bool diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c index 6ab1d3afec02..6461380ff1a4 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c @@ -445,24 +445,27 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *cpumask, unsigned int irq = GIC_HWIRQ_TO_SHARED(d->hwirq); cpumask_t tmp = CPU_MASK_NONE; unsigned long flags; - int i; + int i, cpu; cpumask_and(&tmp, cpumask, cpu_online_mask); if (cpumask_empty(&tmp)) return -EINVAL; + cpu = cpumask_first(&tmp); + /* Assumption : cpumask refers to a single CPU */ spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags); /* Re-route this IRQ */ - gic_map_to_vpe(irq, mips_cm_vp_id(cpumask_first(&tmp))); + gic_map_to_vpe(irq, mips_cm_vp_id(cpu)); /* Update the pcpu_masks */ for (i = 0; i < min(gic_vpes, NR_CPUS); i++) clear_bit(irq, pcpu_masks[i].pcpu_mask); - set_bit(irq, pcpu_masks[cpumask_first(&tmp)].pcpu_mask); + set_bit(irq, pcpu_masks[cpu].pcpu_mask); cpumask_copy(irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d), cpumask); + irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu)); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags); return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY; @@ -716,6 +719,7 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq, if (err) return err; + irqd_set_single_target(irq_desc_get_irq_data(irq_to_desc(virq))); return gic_shared_irq_domain_map(d, virq, hwirq, 0); } -- 2.11.0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [tip:irq/core] irqchip/mips-gic: Report that effective affinity is a single target |
| Message-ID | <ufLrZ-1qM-57@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714702 |
Commit-ID: 18416e45b76189daf37ba53b2bd0b9ac3749e92e Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/18416e45b76189daf37ba53b2bd0b9ac3749e92e Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> AuthorDate: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:39:24 +0100 Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> CommitDate: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:54:43 +0200 irqchip/mips-gic: Report that effective affinity is a single target The MIPS GIC driver only targets a single CPU at a time, even if the notional affinity is wider. Let's inform the core code about this. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com> Cc: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Cc: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170818083925.10108-12-marc.zyngier@arm.com --- drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c | 10 +++++++--- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig index 39bfa5b..bca9a88 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ config IRQ_MIPS_CPU select GENERIC_IRQ_IPI if SYS_SUPPORTS_MULTITHREADING select IRQ_DOMAIN select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY if GENERIC_IRQ_IPI + select GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK config CLPS711X_IRQCHIP bool diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c index 6ab1d3a..6461380 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c @@ -445,24 +445,27 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *cpumask, unsigned int irq = GIC_HWIRQ_TO_SHARED(d->hwirq); cpumask_t tmp = CPU_MASK_NONE; unsigned long flags; - int i; + int i, cpu; cpumask_and(&tmp, cpumask, cpu_online_mask); if (cpumask_empty(&tmp)) return -EINVAL; + cpu = cpumask_first(&tmp); + /* Assumption : cpumask refers to a single CPU */ spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags); /* Re-route this IRQ */ - gic_map_to_vpe(irq, mips_cm_vp_id(cpumask_first(&tmp))); + gic_map_to_vpe(irq, mips_cm_vp_id(cpu)); /* Update the pcpu_masks */ for (i = 0; i < min(gic_vpes, NR_CPUS); i++) clear_bit(irq, pcpu_masks[i].pcpu_mask); - set_bit(irq, pcpu_masks[cpumask_first(&tmp)].pcpu_mask); + set_bit(irq, pcpu_masks[cpu].pcpu_mask); cpumask_copy(irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d), cpumask); + irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu)); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags); return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY; @@ -716,6 +719,7 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq, if (err) return err; + irqd_set_single_target(irq_desc_get_irq_data(irq_to_desc(virq))); return gic_shared_irq_domain_map(d, virq, hwirq, 0); }
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 10:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 09/12] irqchip/metag-ext: Report that effective affinity is a single target |
| Message-ID | <ufL8C-13v-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714693 |
The metag-ext driver only targets a single CPU at a time, even if the notional affinity is wider. Let's inform the core code about this. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> --- arch/metag/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/irqchip/irq-metag-ext.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/metag/Kconfig b/arch/metag/Kconfig index 5b7a45d99cfb..7d8b322e5101 100644 --- a/arch/metag/Kconfig +++ b/arch/metag/Kconfig @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ config METAG select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS select HAVE_UNDERSCORE_SYMBOL_PREFIX select IRQ_DOMAIN + select GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA select OF select OF_EARLY_FLATTREE diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-metag-ext.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-metag-ext.c index 0cdd923d1535..be7216bfb8dd 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-metag-ext.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-metag-ext.c @@ -518,6 +518,8 @@ static int meta_intc_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data, metag_out32(TBI_TRIG_VEC(TBID_SIGNUM_TR2(thread)), vec_addr); + irq_data_update_effective_affinity(data, cpumask_of(cpu)); + return 0; } #else @@ -578,6 +580,8 @@ static int meta_intc_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq, else irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &meta_intc_edge_chip, handle_edge_irq); + + irqd_set_single_target(irq_desc_get_irq_data(irq_to_desc(irq))); return 0; } -- 2.11.0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [tip:irq/core] irqchip/metag-ext: Report that effective affinity is a single target |
| Message-ID | <ufLs0-1qM-65@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714703 |
Commit-ID: 64b5aaad3c743be4f866cfe1ef2c903582e389a3 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/64b5aaad3c743be4f866cfe1ef2c903582e389a3 Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> AuthorDate: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:39:22 +0100 Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> CommitDate: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:54:42 +0200 irqchip/metag-ext: Report that effective affinity is a single target The metag-ext driver only targets a single CPU at a time, even if the notional affinity is wider. Let's inform the core code about this. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com> Cc: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Cc: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170818083925.10108-10-marc.zyngier@arm.com --- arch/metag/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/irqchip/irq-metag-ext.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/metag/Kconfig b/arch/metag/Kconfig index 5b7a45d..7d8b322 100644 --- a/arch/metag/Kconfig +++ b/arch/metag/Kconfig @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ config METAG select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS select HAVE_UNDERSCORE_SYMBOL_PREFIX select IRQ_DOMAIN + select GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA select OF select OF_EARLY_FLATTREE diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-metag-ext.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-metag-ext.c index 0cdd923..be7216b 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-metag-ext.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-metag-ext.c @@ -518,6 +518,8 @@ static int meta_intc_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data, metag_out32(TBI_TRIG_VEC(TBID_SIGNUM_TR2(thread)), vec_addr); + irq_data_update_effective_affinity(data, cpumask_of(cpu)); + return 0; } #else @@ -578,6 +580,8 @@ static int meta_intc_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq, else irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &meta_intc_edge_chip, handle_edge_irq); + + irqd_set_single_target(irq_desc_get_irq_data(irq_to_desc(irq))); return 0; }
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 10:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 07/12] irqchip/bcm-6345-l1: Report that effective affinity is a single target |
| Message-ID | <ufL8C-13v-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714693 |
The BCM 6345-L1 driver only targets a single CPU at a time, even if the notional affinity is wider. Let's inform the core code about this. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> --- drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig index cd688777553c..b36a55d6833e 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ config BCM6345_L1_IRQ bool select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP select IRQ_DOMAIN + select GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK config BCM7038_L1_IRQ bool diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c index daa4ae89e466..43f8abe40878 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c @@ -231,6 +231,8 @@ static int bcm6345_l1_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, } raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intc->lock, flags); + irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(new_cpu)); + return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY; } @@ -291,6 +293,7 @@ static int bcm6345_l1_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq, irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &bcm6345_l1_irq_chip, handle_percpu_irq); irq_set_chip_data(virq, d->host_data); + irqd_set_single_target(irq_desc_get_irq_data(irq_to_desc(virq))); return 0; } -- 2.11.0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [tip:irq/core] irqchip/bcm-6345-l1: Report that effective affinity is a single target |
| Message-ID | <ufLs0-1qM-61@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714704 |
Commit-ID: d0ed5e8e14e95fb3b70885be5ae35d0736866f72 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/d0ed5e8e14e95fb3b70885be5ae35d0736866f72 Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> AuthorDate: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:39:20 +0100 Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> CommitDate: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:54:41 +0200 irqchip/bcm-6345-l1: Report that effective affinity is a single target The BCM 6345-L1 driver only targets a single CPU at a time, even if the notional affinity is wider. Let's inform the core code about this. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com> Cc: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Cc: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170818083925.10108-8-marc.zyngier@arm.com --- drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig index cd68877..b36a55d 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ config BCM6345_L1_IRQ bool select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP select IRQ_DOMAIN + select GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK config BCM7038_L1_IRQ bool diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c index daa4ae8..43f8abe 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c @@ -231,6 +231,8 @@ static int bcm6345_l1_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, } raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intc->lock, flags); + irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(new_cpu)); + return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY; } @@ -291,6 +293,7 @@ static int bcm6345_l1_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq, irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &bcm6345_l1_irq_chip, handle_percpu_irq); irq_set_chip_data(virq, d->host_data); + irqd_set_single_target(irq_desc_get_irq_data(irq_to_desc(virq))); return 0; }
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 10:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 01/12] genirq: Restrict effective affinity to interrupts actually using it |
| Message-ID | <ufL8C-13v-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714693 |
Just because CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK is selected
doesn't mean that all the interrupts are using the effective
affinity mask. For a number of them, this mask is likely to
be empty.
In order to deal with this, let's restrict the use of the
effective affinity mask to these interrupts that have a non empty
effective affinity.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
include/linux/irq.h | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
index d2d543794093..dcfac6c8ba18 100644
--- a/include/linux/irq.h
+++ b/include/linux/irq.h
@@ -781,7 +781,10 @@ static inline struct cpumask *irq_data_get_affinity_mask(struct irq_data *d)
static inline
struct cpumask *irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(struct irq_data *d)
{
- return d->common->effective_affinity;
+ if (!cpumask_empty(d->common->effective_affinity))
+ return d->common->effective_affinity;
+
+ return d->common->affinity;
}
static inline void irq_data_update_effective_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
const struct cpumask *m)
--
2.11.0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [tip:irq/core] genirq: Restrict effective affinity to interrupts actually using it |
| Message-ID | <ufLrZ-1qM-49@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714709 |
Commit-ID: 74def747bcd09692bdbf8c6a15350795b0f11ca8
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/74def747bcd09692bdbf8c6a15350795b0f11ca8
Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:39:14 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:54:39 +0200
genirq: Restrict effective affinity to interrupts actually using it
Just because CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK is selected
doesn't mean that all the interrupts are using the effective
affinity mask. For a number of them, this mask is likely to
be empty.
In order to deal with this, let's restrict the use of the
effective affinity mask to these interrupts that have a non empty
effective affinity.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Cc: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>
Cc: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com>
Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170818083925.10108-2-marc.zyngier@arm.com
---
include/linux/irq.h | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
index d2d54379..dcfac6c 100644
--- a/include/linux/irq.h
+++ b/include/linux/irq.h
@@ -781,7 +781,10 @@ static inline struct cpumask *irq_data_get_affinity_mask(struct irq_data *d)
static inline
struct cpumask *irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(struct irq_data *d)
{
- return d->common->effective_affinity;
+ if (!cpumask_empty(d->common->effective_affinity))
+ return d->common->effective_affinity;
+
+ return d->common->affinity;
}
static inline void irq_data_update_effective_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
const struct cpumask *m)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 10:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 03/12] irqchip/gic: Report that effective affinity is a single target |
| Message-ID | <ufL8C-13v-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714693 |
The GIC driver only targets a single CPU at a time, even if the notional affinity is wider. Let's inform the core code about this. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> --- drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig index f1fd5f44d1d4..586929d072ca 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ config ARM_GIC select IRQ_DOMAIN select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER + select GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK config ARM_GIC_PM bool diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c index 1b1df4f770bd..20dd2ba3d603 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c @@ -344,6 +344,8 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val, writel_relaxed(val | bit, reg); gic_unlock_irqrestore(flags); + irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu)); + return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE; } #endif @@ -966,6 +968,7 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq, irq_domain_set_info(d, irq, hw, &gic->chip, d->host_data, handle_fasteoi_irq, NULL, NULL); irq_set_probe(irq); + irqd_set_single_target(irq_desc_get_irq_data(irq_to_desc(irq))); } return 0; } -- 2.11.0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [tip:irq/core] irqchip/gic: Report that effective affinity is a single target |
| Message-ID | <ufLrY-1qM-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714710 |
Commit-ID: 0c9e498286ef9762e0ae62fc8a02b4739796970f Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/0c9e498286ef9762e0ae62fc8a02b4739796970f Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> AuthorDate: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:39:16 +0100 Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> CommitDate: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:54:40 +0200 irqchip/gic: Report that effective affinity is a single target The GIC driver only targets a single CPU at a time, even if the notional affinity is wider. Let's inform the core code about this. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com> Cc: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Cc: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170818083925.10108-4-marc.zyngier@arm.com --- drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig index f1fd5f4..586929d 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ config ARM_GIC select IRQ_DOMAIN select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER + select GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK config ARM_GIC_PM bool diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c index 1b1df4f..20dd2ba 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c @@ -344,6 +344,8 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val, writel_relaxed(val | bit, reg); gic_unlock_irqrestore(flags); + irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu)); + return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE; } #endif @@ -966,6 +968,7 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq, irq_domain_set_info(d, irq, hw, &gic->chip, d->host_data, handle_fasteoi_irq, NULL, NULL); irq_set_probe(irq); + irqd_set_single_target(irq_desc_get_irq_data(irq_to_desc(irq))); } return 0; }
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 10:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 10/12] irqchip/hip04: Report that effective affinity is a single target |
| Message-ID | <ufL8D-13v-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714693 |
The HIP04 driver only targets a single CPU at a time, even if the notional affinity is wider. Let's inform the core code about this. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> --- arch/arm/mach-hisi/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/irqchip/irq-hip04.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-hisi/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-hisi/Kconfig index a3b091a4d344..65a048fa08ec 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-hisi/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-hisi/Kconfig @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ config ARCH_HIP04 select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER select MCPM if SMP select MCPM_QUAD_CLUSTER if SMP + select GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK help Support for Hisilicon HiP04 SoC family diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-hip04.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-hip04.c index c1b4ee955dbe..5b4fd2f4e5f8 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-hip04.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-hip04.c @@ -165,6 +165,8 @@ static int hip04_irq_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, writel_relaxed(val | bit, reg); raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock); + irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu)); + return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK; } #endif @@ -312,6 +314,7 @@ static int hip04_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq, irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &hip04_irq_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq); irq_set_probe(irq); + irqd_set_single_target(irq_desc_get_irq_data(irq_to_desc(irq))); } irq_set_chip_data(irq, d->host_data); return 0; -- 2.11.0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 11:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [tip:irq/core] irqchip/hip04: Report that effective affinity is a single target |
| Message-ID | <ufLs0-1qM-77@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714713 |
Commit-ID: 79a0d4d8f1ae9568a952c8e5928ee81b30c8df11 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/79a0d4d8f1ae9568a952c8e5928ee81b30c8df11 Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> AuthorDate: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:39:23 +0100 Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> CommitDate: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:54:42 +0200 irqchip/hip04: Report that effective affinity is a single target The HIP04 driver only targets a single CPU at a time, even if the notional affinity is wider. Let's inform the core code about this. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com> Cc: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Cc: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170818083925.10108-11-marc.zyngier@arm.com --- arch/arm/mach-hisi/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/irqchip/irq-hip04.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-hisi/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-hisi/Kconfig index a3b091a..65a048f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-hisi/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-hisi/Kconfig @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ config ARCH_HIP04 select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER select MCPM if SMP select MCPM_QUAD_CLUSTER if SMP + select GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK help Support for Hisilicon HiP04 SoC family diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-hip04.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-hip04.c index c1b4ee9..5b4fd2f 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-hip04.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-hip04.c @@ -165,6 +165,8 @@ static int hip04_irq_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, writel_relaxed(val | bit, reg); raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock); + irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu)); + return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK; } #endif @@ -312,6 +314,7 @@ static int hip04_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq, irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &hip04_irq_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq); irq_set_probe(irq); + irqd_set_single_target(irq_desc_get_irq_data(irq_to_desc(irq))); } irq_set_chip_data(irq, d->host_data); return 0;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 10:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 12/12] irqchip/xtensa-mx: Report that effective affinity is a single target |
| Message-ID | <ufL8D-13v-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714693 |
The xtensa-mx driver only targets a single CPU at a time, even if
the notional affinity is wider. Let's inform the core code
about this.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/irqchip/irq-xtensa-mx.c | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
index bca9a88012f0..1139de9da21a 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
@@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ config VERSATILE_FPGA_IRQ_NR
config XTENSA_MX
bool
select IRQ_DOMAIN
+ select GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK
config XILINX_INTC
bool
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-xtensa-mx.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-xtensa-mx.c
index 72a391e01011..a15a9510c904 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-xtensa-mx.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-xtensa-mx.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ static int xtensa_mx_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_LEVEL);
return 0;
}
+ irqd_set_single_target(irq_desc_get_irq_data(irq_to_desc(irq)));
return xtensa_irq_map(d, irq, hw);
}
@@ -121,9 +122,12 @@ static int xtensa_mx_irq_retrigger(struct irq_data *d)
static int xtensa_mx_irq_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
const struct cpumask *dest, bool force)
{
- unsigned mask = 1u << cpumask_any_and(dest, cpu_online_mask);
+ int cpu = cpumask_any_and(dest, cpu_online_mask);
+ unsigned mask = 1u << cpu;
set_er(mask, MIROUT(d->hwirq - HW_IRQ_MX_BASE));
+ irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
+
return 0;
}
--
2.11.0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web