Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1712183 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Anton Volkov <avolkov@ispras.ru> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-08-15 15:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-08-16 07:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
Possible race in c4.ko Anton Volkov <avolkov@ispras.ru> - 2017-08-15 15:30 +0200
Re: Possible race in c4.ko Carsten Paeth <calle@calle.in-berlin.de> - 2017-08-16 07:10 +0200
| From | Anton Volkov <avolkov@ispras.ru> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-15 15:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Possible race in c4.ko |
| Message-ID | <ueK4W-1Pe-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hello.
While searching for races in the Linux kernel I've come across
"drivers/isdn/hardware/avm/c4.ko" module. Here is a question that I came
up with while analyzing results. Lines are given using the info from
Linux v4.12.
Consider the following case:
Thread 1: Thread 2:
c4_probe
->c4_add_card
request_irq()
c4_interrupt
->c4_handle_interrupt
->c4_handle_rx
card->cardnr = ... cidx = f(card->cardnr)
(c4.c: line 1227) (c4.c: line 526)
if (cidx >= card->nlogcontr) cidx = 0;
ctrl = &card->ctrlinfo[cidx].capi_ctrl
card->cardnr is 0 until it is initialized in c4_add_card(). If at the
moment of read access in c4_handle_rx() it is still 0, cidx may then be
assigned an undesirable value and wrong controller may handle messages.
Is this case feasible from your point of view?
Thank you for your time.
-- Anton Volkov
Linux Verification Center, ISPRAS
web: http://linuxtesting.org
e-mail: avolkov@ispras.ru
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Carsten Paeth <calle@calle.in-berlin.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-16 07:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ueYKB-2PV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1712183 |
Hello Anton, Thanks for reviewing the code. This would be right, if the c4 could rise an interrupt at this moment ... After a reset with c4_reset(), the card will not generate an interrupt, until firmware has been loaded and the SEND_INIT message has been sent. c4_load_firmware() -> c4_send_init() sets the card number in the card. Therefor it's not an issue. best regards, calle Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 04:22:16PM +0300, Anton Volkov schrieb: > Hello. > > While searching for races in the Linux kernel I've come across > "drivers/isdn/hardware/avm/c4.ko" module. Here is a question that I came up > with while analyzing results. Lines are given using the info from Linux > v4.12. > > Consider the following case: > > Thread 1: Thread 2: > c4_probe > ->c4_add_card > request_irq() > c4_interrupt > ->c4_handle_interrupt > ->c4_handle_rx > card->cardnr = ... cidx = f(card->cardnr) > (c4.c: line 1227) (c4.c: line 526) > if (cidx >= card->nlogcontr) cidx = 0; > ctrl = &card->ctrlinfo[cidx].capi_ctrl > > card->cardnr is 0 until it is initialized in c4_add_card(). If at the moment > of read access in c4_handle_rx() it is still 0, cidx may then be assigned an > undesirable value and wrong controller may handle messages. Is this case > feasible from your point of view? > > Thank you for your time. > > -- Anton Volkov > Linux Verification Center, ISPRAS > web: http://linuxtesting.org > e-mail: avolkov@ispras.ru
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web