Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1712196 > unrolled thread

Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: x86: PIE support and option to extend KASLR randomization

Started byRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
First post2017-08-15 15:50 +0200
Last post2017-08-15 15:50 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: x86: PIE support and option to extend  KASLR randomization Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2017-08-15 15:50 +0200

#1712196 — Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: x86: PIE support and option to extend KASLR randomization

FromRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Date2017-08-15 15:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [kernel-hardening] Re: x86: PIE support and option to extend KASLR randomization
Message-ID<ueKoh-1VC-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 08:15 -0400, Jordan Glover wrote:
> Hello,
> I write to put different perspective into the topic. I'm glad that
> kernel developers care about performance optimizations and I see how
> 10% overhead can be a problem for some. On the other hand last ten
> years gave us 1000% faster hardware which trumps anything software
> can do. For many users like us performance isn't a problem, we have
> plenty of it and if we haven't we can buy it. It can be money
> problem, not software engineering problem.

CPUs stopped getting faster at a dramatic rate, though,
while network cards continue to get faster.

In some areas, the kernel is more squeezed for CPU cycles
today than it has ever been before.

Ingo is suggesting that the security enhancement be
implemented in a way that doesn't come with a 10% performance
gain. There are other ways to relocate a kernel than with PIE.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web