Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1710191 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-08-12 09:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-08-18 14:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> - 2017-08-12 09:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2017-08-17 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> - 2017-08-17 23:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2017-08-17 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-08-18 14:30 +0200
| From | Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-12 09:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number |
| Message-ID | <udzlf-69b-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
instance_count defines number of instances of data block and instance itself is indexed from zero, which means first instance has number 0. Therefore check for invalid instance should be non-strict inequality. Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> --- drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c index e32ba57..0765b17 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ acpi_status wmi_evaluate_method(const char *guid_string, u8 instance, if (!(block->flags & ACPI_WMI_METHOD)) return AE_BAD_DATA; - if (block->instance_count < instance) + if (block->instance_count <= instance) return AE_BAD_PARAMETER; input.count = 2; @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static acpi_status __query_block(struct wmi_block *wblock, u8 instance, block = &wblock->gblock; handle = wblock->acpi_device->handle; - if (block->instance_count < instance) + if (block->instance_count <= instance) return AE_BAD_PARAMETER; /* Check GUID is a data block */ @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ acpi_status wmi_set_block(const char *guid_string, u8 instance, block = &wblock->gblock; handle = wblock->acpi_device->handle; - if (block->instance_count < instance) + if (block->instance_count <= instance) return AE_BAD_PARAMETER; /* Check GUID is a data block */ -- 1.7.9.5
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-17 17:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number |
| Message-ID | <ufuUa-6IK-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1710191 |
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > instance_count defines number of instances of data block and instance > itself is indexed from zero, which means first instance has number 0. > Therefore check for invalid instance should be non-strict inequality. > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> This is correct per the WMI specification. Pali, now that Andy has applied 1-3 of this series, is that all the required driver updates? Reviewed-by: Darren Hart (VMware) <dvhart@infradead.org> > --- > drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c > index e32ba57..0765b17 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c > @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ acpi_status wmi_evaluate_method(const char *guid_string, u8 instance, > if (!(block->flags & ACPI_WMI_METHOD)) > return AE_BAD_DATA; > > - if (block->instance_count < instance) > + if (block->instance_count <= instance) > return AE_BAD_PARAMETER; > > input.count = 2; > @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static acpi_status __query_block(struct wmi_block *wblock, u8 instance, > block = &wblock->gblock; > handle = wblock->acpi_device->handle; > > - if (block->instance_count < instance) > + if (block->instance_count <= instance) > return AE_BAD_PARAMETER; > > /* Check GUID is a data block */ > @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ acpi_status wmi_set_block(const char *guid_string, u8 instance, > block = &wblock->gblock; > handle = wblock->acpi_device->handle; > > - if (block->instance_count < instance) > + if (block->instance_count <= instance) > return AE_BAD_PARAMETER; > > /* Check GUID is a data block */ > -- > 1.7.9.5 > > -- Darren Hart VMware Open Source Technology Center
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-17 23:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number |
| Message-ID | <ufAmR-21P-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714138 |
On Thursday 17 August 2017 08:24:31 Darren Hart wrote: > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > instance_count defines number of instances of data block and instance > > itself is indexed from zero, which means first instance has number 0. > > Therefore check for invalid instance should be non-strict inequality. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> > > This is correct per the WMI specification. Pali, now that Andy has > applied 1-3 of this series, is that all the required driver updates? Hmmm... I have not understood your question. I checked that all drivers which uses instance id 1 have comment explaining why is id 1 used. Problematic drivers without comment have either patch to use instance id 0 in this series or somebody else already supplied patch which is part of linus tree. > Reviewed-by: Darren Hart (VMware) <dvhart@infradead.org> > > > > --- > > drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c > > index e32ba57..0765b17 100644 > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c > > @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ acpi_status wmi_evaluate_method(const char *guid_string, u8 instance, > > if (!(block->flags & ACPI_WMI_METHOD)) > > return AE_BAD_DATA; > > > > - if (block->instance_count < instance) > > + if (block->instance_count <= instance) > > return AE_BAD_PARAMETER; > > > > input.count = 2; > > @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static acpi_status __query_block(struct wmi_block *wblock, u8 instance, > > block = &wblock->gblock; > > handle = wblock->acpi_device->handle; > > > > - if (block->instance_count < instance) > > + if (block->instance_count <= instance) > > return AE_BAD_PARAMETER; > > > > /* Check GUID is a data block */ > > @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ acpi_status wmi_set_block(const char *guid_string, u8 instance, > > block = &wblock->gblock; > > handle = wblock->acpi_device->handle; > > > > - if (block->instance_count < instance) > > + if (block->instance_count <= instance) > > return AE_BAD_PARAMETER; > > > > /* Check GUID is a data block */ > > -- > > 1.7.9.5 > > > > > -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@gmail.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-17 23:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number |
| Message-ID | <ufAGf-2aJ-61@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714386 |
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Thursday 17 August 2017 08:24:31 Darren Hart wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > instance_count defines number of instances of data block and instance > > > itself is indexed from zero, which means first instance has number 0. > > > Therefore check for invalid instance should be non-strict inequality. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> > > > > This is correct per the WMI specification. Pali, now that Andy has > > applied 1-3 of this series, is that all the required driver updates? > > Hmmm... I have not understood your question. > > I checked that all drivers which uses instance id 1 have comment > explaining why is id 1 used. > > Problematic drivers without comment have either patch to use instance id > 0 in this series or somebody else already supplied patch which is part > of linus tree. Perfect, that is what I was looking for. Thanks Pali! > > > Reviewed-by: Darren Hart (VMware) <dvhart@infradead.org> -- Darren Hart VMware Open Source Technology Center
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-18 14:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ufOzx-3Ek-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1714138 |
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: >> instance_count defines number of instances of data block and instance >> itself is indexed from zero, which means first instance has number 0. >> Therefore check for invalid instance should be non-strict inequality. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> > > This is correct per the WMI specification. Pali, now that Andy has > applied 1-3 of this series, is that all the required driver updates? > > Reviewed-by: Darren Hart (VMware) <dvhart@infradead.org> Pushed to testing, thanks! > > >> --- >> drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 6 +++--- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c >> index e32ba57..0765b17 100644 >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c >> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ acpi_status wmi_evaluate_method(const char *guid_string, u8 instance, >> if (!(block->flags & ACPI_WMI_METHOD)) >> return AE_BAD_DATA; >> >> - if (block->instance_count < instance) >> + if (block->instance_count <= instance) >> return AE_BAD_PARAMETER; >> >> input.count = 2; >> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static acpi_status __query_block(struct wmi_block *wblock, u8 instance, >> block = &wblock->gblock; >> handle = wblock->acpi_device->handle; >> >> - if (block->instance_count < instance) >> + if (block->instance_count <= instance) >> return AE_BAD_PARAMETER; >> >> /* Check GUID is a data block */ >> @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ acpi_status wmi_set_block(const char *guid_string, u8 instance, >> block = &wblock->gblock; >> handle = wblock->acpi_device->handle; >> >> - if (block->instance_count < instance) >> + if (block->instance_count <= instance) >> return AE_BAD_PARAMETER; >> >> /* Check GUID is a data block */ >> -- >> 1.7.9.5 >> >> > > -- > Darren Hart > VMware Open Source Technology Center -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web