Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1710277 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0/3] ALSA: rme96: Adjustments for six function implementations

Started bySF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
First post2017-08-12 15:40 +0200
Last post2017-08-12 23:30 +0200
Articles 5 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 0/3] ALSA: rme96: Adjustments for six function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-12 15:40 +0200
    [PATCH 1/3] ALSA: rme96: Delete two error messages for a failed  memory allocation in snd_rme96_probe() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-12 15:50 +0200
    [PATCH 2/3] ALSA: rme96: Use common error handling code in  snd_rme96_probe() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-12 15:50 +0200
    [PATCH 3/3] ALSA: rme96: Adjust five checks for null pointers SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-12 15:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/3] ALSA: rme96: Adjustments for six function implementations Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> - 2017-08-12 23:30 +0200

#1710277 — [PATCH 0/3] ALSA: rme96: Adjustments for six function implementations

FromSF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date2017-08-12 15:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH 0/3] ALSA: rme96: Adjustments for six function implementations
Message-ID<udENY-1ls-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 15:36:54 +0200

A few update suggestions were taken into account
from static source code analysis.

Markus Elfring (3):
  Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in snd_rme96_probe()
  Use common error handling code in snd_rme96_probe()
  Adjust five checks for null pointers

 sound/pci/rme96.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

-- 
2.14.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1710279 — [PATCH 1/3] ALSA: rme96: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in snd_rme96_probe()

FromSF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date2017-08-12 15:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH 1/3] ALSA: rme96: Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in snd_rme96_probe()
Message-ID<udEXD-1pb-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1710277
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 14:24:41 +0200

Omit extra messages for a memory allocation failure in this function.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 sound/pci/rme96.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/pci/rme96.c b/sound/pci/rme96.c
index 2e19ba55e754..82e8c78e48ca 100644
--- a/sound/pci/rme96.c
+++ b/sound/pci/rme96.c
@@ -2489,15 +2489,11 @@ snd_rme96_probe(struct pci_dev *pci,
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
 	rme96->playback_suspend_buffer = vmalloc(RME96_BUFFER_SIZE);
 	if (!rme96->playback_suspend_buffer) {
-		dev_err(card->dev,
-			   "Failed to allocate playback suspend buffer!\n");
 		snd_card_free(card);
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 	rme96->capture_suspend_buffer = vmalloc(RME96_BUFFER_SIZE);
 	if (!rme96->capture_suspend_buffer) {
-		dev_err(card->dev,
-			   "Failed to allocate capture suspend buffer!\n");
 		snd_card_free(card);
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
-- 
2.14.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1710280 — [PATCH 2/3] ALSA: rme96: Use common error handling code in snd_rme96_probe()

FromSF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date2017-08-12 15:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH 2/3] ALSA: rme96: Use common error handling code in snd_rme96_probe()
Message-ID<udEXD-1pb-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1710277
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 14:50:33 +0200

Add a jump target so that a bit of exception handling can be better reused
at the end of this function.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 sound/pci/rme96.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/pci/rme96.c b/sound/pci/rme96.c
index 82e8c78e48ca..0cdfd53b7796 100644
--- a/sound/pci/rme96.c
+++ b/sound/pci/rme96.c
@@ -2481,21 +2481,20 @@ snd_rme96_probe(struct pci_dev *pci,
 	rme96 = card->private_data;
 	rme96->card = card;
 	rme96->pci = pci;
-	if ((err = snd_rme96_create(rme96)) < 0) {
-		snd_card_free(card);
-		return err;
-	}
+	err = snd_rme96_create(rme96);
+	if (err)
+		goto free_card;
 	
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
 	rme96->playback_suspend_buffer = vmalloc(RME96_BUFFER_SIZE);
 	if (!rme96->playback_suspend_buffer) {
-		snd_card_free(card);
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		err = -ENOMEM;
+		goto free_card;
 	}
 	rme96->capture_suspend_buffer = vmalloc(RME96_BUFFER_SIZE);
 	if (!rme96->capture_suspend_buffer) {
-		snd_card_free(card);
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		err = -ENOMEM;
+		goto free_card;
 	}
 #endif
 
@@ -2521,14 +2520,16 @@ snd_rme96_probe(struct pci_dev *pci,
 	}
 	sprintf(card->longname, "%s at 0x%lx, irq %d", card->shortname,
 		rme96->port, rme96->irq);
-	
-	if ((err = snd_card_register(card)) < 0) {
-		snd_card_free(card);
-		return err;	
-	}
+	err = snd_card_register(card);
+	if (err)
+		goto free_card;
+
 	pci_set_drvdata(pci, card);
 	dev++;
 	return 0;
+free_card:
+	snd_card_free(card);
+	return err;
 }
 
 static void snd_rme96_remove(struct pci_dev *pci)
-- 
2.14.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1710281 — [PATCH 3/3] ALSA: rme96: Adjust five checks for null pointers

FromSF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date2017-08-12 15:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH 3/3] ALSA: rme96: Adjust five checks for null pointers
Message-ID<udEXD-1pb-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1710277
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 15:18:56 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

The script “checkpatch.pl” pointed information out like the following.

Comparison to NULL could be written …

Thus fix the affected source code places.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 sound/pci/rme96.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/pci/rme96.c b/sound/pci/rme96.c
index 0cdfd53b7796..b488d74c3b99 100644
--- a/sound/pci/rme96.c
+++ b/sound/pci/rme96.c
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ snd_rme96_playback_spdif_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
 
 	snd_pcm_set_sync(substream);
 	spin_lock_irq(&rme96->lock);	
-        if (rme96->playback_substream != NULL) {
+	if (rme96->playback_substream) {
 		spin_unlock_irq(&rme96->lock);
                 return -EBUSY;
         }
@@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ snd_rme96_capture_spdif_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
         }
         
 	spin_lock_irq(&rme96->lock);
-        if (rme96->capture_substream != NULL) {
+	if (rme96->capture_substream) {
 		spin_unlock_irq(&rme96->lock);
                 return -EBUSY;
         }
@@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ snd_rme96_playback_adat_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
 	
 	snd_pcm_set_sync(substream);
 	spin_lock_irq(&rme96->lock);	
-        if (rme96->playback_substream != NULL) {
+	if (rme96->playback_substream) {
 		spin_unlock_irq(&rme96->lock);
                 return -EBUSY;
         }
@@ -1315,7 +1315,7 @@ snd_rme96_capture_adat_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
         }
         
 	spin_lock_irq(&rme96->lock);	
-        if (rme96->capture_substream != NULL) {
+	if (rme96->capture_substream) {
 		spin_unlock_irq(&rme96->lock);
                 return -EBUSY;
         }
@@ -1578,9 +1578,9 @@ snd_rme96_free(void *private_data)
 {
 	struct rme96 *rme96 = (struct rme96 *)private_data;
 
-	if (rme96 == NULL) {
+	if (!rme96)
 	        return;
-	}
+
 	if (rme96->irq >= 0) {
 		snd_rme96_trigger(rme96, RME96_STOP_BOTH);
 		rme96->areg &= ~RME96_AR_DAC_EN;
-- 
2.14.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1710366

FromTakashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Date2017-08-12 23:30 +0200
Message-ID<udM8O-6gz-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1710277
On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 15:38:01 +0200,
SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> 
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 15:36:54 +0200
> 
> A few update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
> 
> Markus Elfring (3):
>   Delete two error messages for a failed memory allocation in snd_rme96_probe()
>   Use common error handling code in snd_rme96_probe()
>   Adjust five checks for null pointers

Applied all three patches, thanks.


Takashi

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web