Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1710237 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] i2c: aspeed: add proper support fo 24xx clock params

Started byWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
First post2017-08-12 13:40 +0200
Last post2017-08-14 06:00 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] i2c: aspeed: add proper support fo 24xx clock  params Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2017-08-12 13:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] i2c: aspeed: add proper support fo 24xx clock params Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> - 2017-08-14 06:00 +0200

#1710237 — Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] i2c: aspeed: add proper support fo 24xx clock params

FromWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Date2017-08-12 13:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/1] i2c: aspeed: add proper support fo 24xx clock params
Message-ID<udCVQ-7z-15@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

> That being said, I could implement this as a custom clock subclass, which
> would probably be cleaner that what I have done.

Shall I wait for that one or do you want this patch to be included?
I don't mind, your call here...

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1710624 — Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] i2c: aspeed: add proper support fo 24xx clock params

FromBrendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Date2017-08-14 06:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/1] i2c: aspeed: add proper support fo 24xx clock params
Message-ID<ueeHL-7u6-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1710237
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote:
>
>> That being said, I could implement this as a custom clock subclass, which
>> would probably be cleaner that what I have done.
>
> Shall I wait for that one or do you want this patch to be included?
> I don't mind, your call here...
>

Let's go ahead with this patch. I do not have too much experience with the
clock stuff, so I imagine that will probably take some back and forth.

Thanks!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web