Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1705641 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-08-07 17:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-08-07 23:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v6] MIPS: NI 169445 board support Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> - 2017-08-07 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6] MIPS: NI 169445 board support Nathan Sullivan <nathan.sullivan@ni.com> - 2017-08-07 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6] MIPS: NI 169445 board support Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> - 2017-08-07 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6] MIPS: NI 169445 board support Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> - 2017-08-07 23:40 +0200
| From | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-07 17:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v6] MIPS: NI 169445 board support |
| Message-ID | <ubS8H-1Uh-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:29:09PM -0500, Nathan Sullivan wrote:
> Support the National Instruments 169445 board.
Thanks, applied with minor changes:
> --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/Makefile
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ dts-dirs += img
> dts-dirs += ingenic
> dts-dirs += lantiq
> dts-dirs += mti
> +dts-dirs += ni
> dts-dirs += netlogic
> dts-dirs += pic32
> dts-dirs += qca
Keep things in alphabetical order, so ni should go after netlogic.
> diff --git a/arch/mips/generic/vmlinux.its.S b/arch/mips/generic/vmlinux.its.S
> index f67fbf1..de851f7 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/generic/vmlinux.its.S
> +++ b/arch/mips/generic/vmlinux.its.S
> @@ -29,3 +29,28 @@
> };
> };
> };
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FIT_IMAGE_FDT_NI169445
> +/ {
> + images {
[...]
> + };
> +};
> +#endif
There's been a reject on this file because of a Boston #ifdefed section.
I've fixed that up but we need a cleaner solution. Paul, any suggestions?
Ralf
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nathan Sullivan <nathan.sullivan@ni.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-07 17:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ubSil-1Ys-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1705641 |
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 05:26:48PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:29:09PM -0500, Nathan Sullivan wrote: > > > Support the National Instruments 169445 board. > > Thanks, applied with minor changes: > > Ralf Thank you for your patience! Nathan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-07 19:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ubU0Q-3iZ-59@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1705641 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi Ralf,
On Monday, 7 August 2017 08:26:48 PDT Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:29:09PM -0500, Nathan Sullivan wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/generic/vmlinux.its.S
> > b/arch/mips/generic/vmlinux.its.S index f67fbf1..de851f7 100644
> > --- a/arch/mips/generic/vmlinux.its.S
> > +++ b/arch/mips/generic/vmlinux.its.S
> > @@ -29,3 +29,28 @@
> >
> > };
> >
> > };
> >
> > };
> >
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_FIT_IMAGE_FDT_NI169445
> > +/ {
> > + images {
>
> [...]
>
> > + };
> > +};
> > +#endif
>
> There's been a reject on this file because of a Boston #ifdefed section.
> I've fixed that up but we need a cleaner solution. Paul, any suggestions?
>
> Ralf
One possibility would be for us to split the board portions of vmlinux.its.S
out into a file per-board, perhaps board-boston.its.S, board-ni169445.its.S
etc. The build process would then have to concatenate the right files to
generate the full image tree source.
Does that sound good to you?
Thanks,
Paul
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-07 23:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ubXUK-6aH-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1705729 |
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 10:24:05AM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > One possibility would be for us to split the board portions of vmlinux.its.S > out into a file per-board, perhaps board-boston.its.S, board-ni169445.its.S > etc. The build process would then have to concatenate the right files to > generate the full image tree source. > > Does that sound good to you? Yes, that sounds good. Ralf
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web