Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1703383 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 4.4 66/90] powerpc/numa: Fix percpu allocations to be NUMA aware

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 4.4 66/90] powerpc/numa: Fix percpu allocations to be  NUMA aware Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-08-03 21:40 +0200

#1703383 — Re: [PATCH 4.4 66/90] powerpc/numa: Fix percpu allocations to be NUMA aware

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:41:16AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 28-07-17 15:41:47, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 03:53:35PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > JFYI. We have encountered a regression after applying this patch on a
> > > large ppc machine. While the patch is the right thing to do it doesn't
> > > work well with the current vmalloc area size on ppc and large machines
> > > where NUMA nodes are very far from each other. Just for the reference
> > > the boot fails on such a machine with bunch of warning preceeding it.
> > > See http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170724134240.GL25221@dhcp22.suse.cz
> > > 
> > > It seems the right thing to do is to enlarge the vmalloc space on ppc
> > > but this is not the case in the upstream kernel yet AFAIK. It is also
> > > questionable whether that is a stable material but I will decision on
> > > you here.
> > > 
> > > We have reverted this patch from our 4.4 based kernel.
> > 
> > But all is fine on newer kernels?  That is odd.
> 
> Newer kernels do not have enlarged vmalloc space yet AFAIK so they won't
> work properly eiter. This bug is quite rare though because you need a
> specific HW configuration to trigger the issue - namely NUMA nodes have
> to be far away from each other in the physical memory space.
> 
> > I'll be glad to drop it, but should it be dropped from all stable trees?
> 
> Yes from all stable backports.

Ok, now all reverted, thanks.

greg k-h

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web