Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1702030 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 0/3] simulated interrupts

Started byLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
First post2017-08-02 13:40 +0200
Last post2017-08-02 13:40 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 0/3] simulated interrupts Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-08-02 13:40 +0200

#1702030 — Re: [PATCH 0/3] simulated interrupts

FromLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date2017-08-02 13:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] simulated interrupts
Message-ID<ua0am-Og-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:

> On a slightly tangential subject, there is another aspect that I thought
> of implementing for a while, but always ended up just relying on a quick
> hack: forcing the injection of an actual interrupt. A number of
> interrupt controllers have the ability to make an interrupt pending, for
> it to be handled as if a device had actually triggered it.

This would be especially useful for a class of embedded systems that
are woken up from deep sleep by an asynchronous interrupt controller.

Usually GPIO(-ish) lines are armed and the system put to sleep, and
when it comes up, the information of what line woke it up is there in a
special register, but the actual (synchronous) interrupt line is no longer
asserted or edge triggered, so an interrupt need to be inserted.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web