Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1700219 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v3 00/59] irqchip: KVM: Add support for GICv4

Started byMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
First post2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
Last post2017-07-31 20:10 +0200
Articles 20 on this page of 59 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH v3 00/59] irqchip: KVM: Add support for GICv4 Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 10/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Split out pending table allocation Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 37/59] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Move kvm_vgic_destroy call around Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 12/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Generalize device table allocation Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 55/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Enable VLPI support Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 14/59] irqchip/gic-v4: Add management structure definitions Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 54/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Enable virtual cpuif if VLPIs can be delivered Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 45/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Handle CLEAR applied to a VLPI Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 49/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Propagate VLPI properties at map time Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 59/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Workaround Huawei D05 redistributor addressing Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 47/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Propagate property updates to VLPIs Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 05/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add probing for VLPI properties Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 29/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Set implementation defined bit to enable VLPIs Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 33/59] irqchip/gic-v4: Add some basic documentation Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 35/59] irqchip/gic-v3: Advertise GICv4 support to KVM Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 41/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Wire mapping/unmapping of VLPIs in VFIO irq bypass Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 58/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Pass its_node pointer to each command bulder Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 39/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Add property field and per-VM predicate Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 43/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Unmap VLPI when freeing an LPI Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 31/59] irqchip/gic-v4: Add VPE command interface Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 24/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add VPE invalidation hook Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 19/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add VPE domain infrastructure Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 40/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Add init/teardown of the per-VM vPE irq domain Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
    [PATCH v3 52/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Use the doorbell interrupt as an unblocking source Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
    [PATCH v3 53/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Hook vPE scheduling into vgic flush/sync Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
    [PATCH v3 44/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Handle MOVI applied to a VLPI Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
    [PATCH v3 48/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Handle INVALL applied to a vPE Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
    [PATCH v3 51/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Add doorbell interrupt handling Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3 51/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Add doorbell interrupt  handling Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-08-04 09:50 +0200
    [PATCH v3 42/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Handle INT command applied to a VLPI Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
    [PATCH v3 46/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Handle MOVALL applied to a vPE Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
    [PATCH v3 56/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Prevent heterogenous systems from using GICv4 Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
    [PATCH v3 50/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Use pending_last as a scheduling hint Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
    [PATCH v3 57/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Theory of operations Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
    [PATCH v3 38/59] KVM: arm/arm64: vITS: Add MSI translation helpers Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 32/59] irqchip/gic-v4: Add VLPI configuration interface Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 08/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Split out property table allocation Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 30/59] irqchip/gic-v4: Add per-VM VPE domain creation Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 36/59] KVM: arm: Select ARM_GIC_V3 and ARM_GIC_V3_ITS Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 09/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Allow use of indirect VCPU tables Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 13/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Generalize LPI configuration Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 34/59] irqchip/gic-v4: Enable low-level GICv4 operations Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 22/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add VPENDBASER/VPROPBASER accessors Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 15/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add GICv4 ITS command definitions Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 27/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Support VPE doorbell invalidation even when !DirectLPI Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 26/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add VPE interrupt masking Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 16/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add VLPI configuration hook Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 28/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Allow doorbell interrupts to be injected/cleared Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 06/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Macro-ize its_send_single_command Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 25/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add VPE affinity changes Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 17/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add VLPI map/unmap operations Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 11/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Rework LPI freeing Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 20/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add VPE irq domain allocation/teardown Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 18/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add VLPI configuration handling Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 23/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add VPE scheduling Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
    [PATCH v3 02/59] irqchip/gic-v3: Add redistributor iterator Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:10 +0200
    [PATCH v3 01/59] genirq: Let irq_set_vcpu_affinity() iterate over hierarchy Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:10 +0200
    [PATCH v3 07/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Implement irq_set_irqchip_state for pending state Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:10 +0200
    [PATCH v3 03/59] irqchip/gic-v3: Add VLPI/DirectLPI discovery Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 20:10 +0200

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →


#1700242 — [PATCH v3 24/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add VPE invalidation hook

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3 24/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add VPE invalidation hook
Message-ID<u9mFZ-DO-59@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700219
When a guest issues a INVALL command targetting a collection, it must
be translated into a VINVALL for the VPE that has this collection.

This patch implements a hook that offers this functionallity to the
hypervisor.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index d94a51489f6c..16cdd1f60ebf 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -2226,6 +2226,10 @@ static int its_vpe_set_vcpu_affinity(struct irq_data *d, void *vcpu_info)
 		its_vpe_deschedule(vpe);
 		return 0;
 
+	case INVALL_VPE:
+		its_send_vinvall(vpe);
+		return 0;
+
 	default:
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1700243 — [PATCH v3 19/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add VPE domain infrastructure

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3 19/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add VPE domain infrastructure
Message-ID<u9mFZ-DO-61@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700219
Add the basic GICv4 VPE (vcpu in GICv4 parlance) infrastructure
(irqchip, irq domain) that is going to be populated in the following
patches.

Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index b618c259be8b..1fa345d53088 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -2026,6 +2026,13 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops its_domain_ops = {
 	.deactivate		= its_irq_domain_deactivate,
 };
 
+static struct irq_chip its_vpe_irq_chip = {
+	.name			= "GICv4-vpe",
+};
+
+static const struct irq_domain_ops its_vpe_domain_ops = {
+};
+
 static int its_force_quiescent(void __iomem *base)
 {
 	u32 count = 1000000;	/* 1s */
@@ -2142,6 +2149,11 @@ static int its_init_domain(struct fwnode_handle *handle, struct its_node *its)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int its_init_vpe_domain(void)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __init its_compute_its_list_map(struct resource *res,
 					   void __iomem *its_base)
 {
@@ -2484,6 +2496,9 @@ int __init its_init(struct fwnode_handle *handle, struct rdists *rdists,
 		    struct irq_domain *parent_domain)
 {
 	struct device_node *of_node;
+	struct its_node *its;
+	bool has_v4 = false;
+	int err;
 
 	its_parent = parent_domain;
 	of_node = to_of_node(handle);
@@ -2498,5 +2513,21 @@ int __init its_init(struct fwnode_handle *handle, struct rdists *rdists,
 	}
 
 	gic_rdists = rdists;
-	return its_alloc_lpi_tables();
+	err = its_alloc_lpi_tables();
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	its_lpi_init(rdists->id_bits);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(its, &its_nodes, entry)
+		has_v4 |= its->is_v4;
+
+	if (has_v4 & rdists->has_vlpis) {
+		if (its_init_vpe_domain()) {
+			rdists->has_vlpis = false;
+			pr_err("ITS: Disabling GICv4 support\n");
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1700246 — [PATCH v3 40/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Add init/teardown of the per-VM vPE irq domain

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-07-31 19:30 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3 40/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Add init/teardown of the per-VM vPE irq domain
Message-ID<u9mG0-DO-67@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700219
In order to control the GICv4 view of virtual CPUs, we rely
on an irqdomain allocated for that purpose. Let's add a couple
of helpers to that effect.

At the same time, the vgic data structures gain new fields to
track all this... erm... wonderful stuff.

They way we hook into the vgic init is slightly convoluted. We
need the vgic to be initialized (in order to guarantee that
the number of vcpus is now fixed), and we must have a vITS
(otherwise this is all very pointless). So we end-up calling
the init from both sites...

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm/kvm/Makefile         |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile       |  1 +
 include/kvm/arm_vgic.h        |  8 +++++
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c |  9 ++++++
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c  |  8 +++++
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c   | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h      |  2 ++
 7 files changed, 103 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c

diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
index d9beee652d36..0a1dd2cdb928 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ obj-y += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-init.o
 obj-y += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.o
 obj-y += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.o
 obj-y += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.o
+obj-y += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.o
 obj-y += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.o
 obj-y += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.o
 obj-y += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.o
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
index 5d9810086c25..c30fd388ef80 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-init.o
 kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.o
 kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.o
 kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.o
+kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.o
 kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.o
 kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.o
 kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.o
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
index 84694b42373a..359eeffe9857 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/jump_label.h>
 
+#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h>
+
 #define VGIC_V3_MAX_CPUS	255
 #define VGIC_V2_MAX_CPUS	8
 #define VGIC_NR_IRQS_LEGACY     256
@@ -236,6 +238,9 @@ struct vgic_dist {
 
 	/* used by vgic-debug */
 	struct vgic_state_iter *iter;
+
+	/* GICv4 ITS per-VM stuff */
+	struct its_vm		its_vm;
 };
 
 struct vgic_v2_cpu_if {
@@ -254,6 +259,9 @@ struct vgic_v3_cpu_if {
 	u32		vgic_ap0r[4];
 	u32		vgic_ap1r[4];
 	u64		vgic_lr[VGIC_V3_MAX_LRS];
+
+	/* GICv4 vPE info */
+	struct its_vpe	its_vpe;
 };
 
 struct vgic_cpu {
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c
index 5801261f3add..d1c6c775203d 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c
@@ -285,6 +285,12 @@ int vgic_init(struct kvm *kvm)
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 
+	if (vgic_has_its(kvm) && vgic_is_v4_capable(kvm)) {
+		ret = vgic_v4_init(kvm);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out;
+	}
+
 	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
 		kvm_vgic_vcpu_enable(vcpu);
 
@@ -320,6 +326,9 @@ static void kvm_vgic_dist_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
 
 	kfree(dist->spis);
 	dist->nr_spis = 0;
+
+	if (vgic_is_v4_capable(kvm))
+		vgic_v4_teardown(kvm);
 }
 
 void kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index fb7be8673bff..a2217f53bbe5 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -1603,6 +1603,14 @@ static int vgic_its_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
 	if (!its)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	if (vgic_initialized(dev->kvm)) {
+		int ret = vgic_v4_init(dev->kvm);
+		if (ret) {
+			kfree(its);
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+	
 	mutex_init(&its->its_lock);
 	mutex_init(&its->cmd_lock);
 
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..207e1fda0dcd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2017 ARM Ltd.
+ * Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
+#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
+
+#include "vgic.h"
+
+int vgic_v4_init(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+	int i, nr_vcpus, ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * We may be called each time a vITS is created, or when the
+	 * vgic is initialized. This relies on kvm->lock to be
+	 * held. In both cases, the number of vcpus should now be
+	 * fixed.
+	 */
+	if (dist->its_vm.vpes)
+		return 0;
+
+	nr_vcpus = atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus);
+
+	dist->its_vm.vpes = kzalloc(sizeof(*dist->its_vm.vpes) * nr_vcpus,
+				    GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!dist->its_vm.vpes)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	dist->its_vm.nr_vpes = nr_vcpus;
+
+	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
+		dist->its_vm.vpes[i] = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe;
+
+	ret = its_alloc_vcpu_irqs(&dist->its_vm);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		kvm_err("VPE IRQ allocation failure\n");
+		kfree(dist->its_vm.vpes);
+		dist->its_vm.nr_vpes = 0;
+		dist->its_vm.vpes = NULL;
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+void vgic_v4_teardown(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+	struct its_vm *its_vm = &kvm->arch.vgic.its_vm;
+
+	if (!its_vm->vpes)
+		return;
+
+	its_free_vcpu_irqs(its_vm);
+	kfree(its_vm->vpes);
+	its_vm->nr_vpes = 0;
+	its_vm->vpes = NULL;
+}
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
index 90f6436a11aa..1356f485d7cf 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
@@ -230,5 +230,7 @@ int vgic_its_resolve_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
 struct vgic_its *vgic_msi_to_its(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msi *msi);
 
 bool vgic_is_v4_capable(struct kvm *kvm);
+int vgic_v4_init(struct kvm *kvm);
+void vgic_v4_teardown(struct kvm *kvm);
 
 #endif
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1700247 — [PATCH v3 52/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Use the doorbell interrupt as an unblocking source

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3 52/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Use the doorbell interrupt as an unblocking source
Message-ID<u9mPD-H2-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700219
The doorbell interrupt is only useful if the vcpu is blocked on WFI.
In all other cases, recieving a doorbell interrupt is just a waste
of cycles.

So let's only enable the doorbell if a vcpu is getting blocked,
and disable it when it is unblocked. This is very similar to
what we're doing for the background timer.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 include/kvm/arm_vgic.h      |  3 +++
 virt/kvm/arm/arm.c          |  2 ++
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
index 050f78d4fb42..7b1cc7ff5b42 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
@@ -375,4 +375,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, int irq,
 int kvm_vgic_v4_unset_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, int irq,
 				 struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *irq_entry);
 
+void kvm_vgic_v4_enable_doorbell(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+void kvm_vgic_v4_disable_doorbell(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+
 #endif /* __KVM_ARM_VGIC_H */
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
index 6803ea27c47d..5dbc8dc8fbf4 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
@@ -316,11 +316,13 @@ int kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 void kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	kvm_timer_schedule(vcpu);
+	kvm_vgic_v4_enable_doorbell(vcpu);
 }
 
 void kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	kvm_timer_unschedule(vcpu);
+	kvm_vgic_v4_disable_doorbell(vcpu);
 }
 
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
index 6af3cde6d7d4..50721c4e3da5 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
 #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
 #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 
@@ -73,6 +74,14 @@ int vgic_v4_init(struct kvm *kvm)
 	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
 		int irq = dist->its_vm.vpes[i]->irq;
 
+		/*
+		 * Don't automatically enable the doorbell, as we're
+		 * flipping it back and forth when the vcpu gets
+		 * blocked. Also disable the lazy disabling, as the
+		 * doorbell could kick us out of the guest too
+		 * early...
+		 */
+		irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN | IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY);
 		ret = request_irq(irq, vgic_v4_doorbell_handler,
 				  0, "vcpu", vcpu);
 		if (ret) {
@@ -98,7 +107,10 @@ void vgic_v4_teardown(struct kvm *kvm)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < its_vm->nr_vpes; i++) {
 		struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, i);
-		free_irq(its_vm->vpes[i]->irq, vcpu);
+		int irq = its_vm->vpes[i]->irq;
+
+		irq_clear_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN | IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY);
+		free_irq(irq, vcpu);
 	}
 
 	its_free_vcpu_irqs(its_vm);
@@ -211,3 +223,21 @@ int kvm_vgic_v4_unset_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, int virq,
 	mutex_unlock(&its->its_lock);
 	return ret;
 }
+
+void kvm_vgic_v4_enable_doorbell(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	if (vgic_is_v4_capable(vcpu->kvm)) {
+		int irq = vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe.irq;
+		if (irq)
+			enable_irq(irq);
+	}
+}
+
+void kvm_vgic_v4_disable_doorbell(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	if (vgic_is_v4_capable(vcpu->kvm)) {
+		int irq = vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe.irq;
+		if (irq)
+			disable_irq(irq);
+	}
+}
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1700249 — [PATCH v3 53/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Hook vPE scheduling into vgic flush/sync

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3 53/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Hook vPE scheduling into vgic flush/sync
Message-ID<u9mPE-H2-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700219
The redistributor needs to be told which vPE is about to be run,
and tells us whether there is any pending VLPI on exit.

Let's add the scheduling calls to the vgic flush/sync functions,
allowing the VLPIs to be delivered to the guest.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c    |  4 ++++
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h    |  1 +
 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
index 50721c4e3da5..0a8deefbcf1c 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
@@ -119,6 +119,30 @@ void vgic_v4_teardown(struct kvm *kvm)
 	its_vm->vpes = NULL;
 }
 
+int vgic_v4_schedule(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool on)
+{
+	int irq = vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe.irq;
+
+	if (!vgic_is_v4_capable(vcpu->kvm) || !irq)
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Before making the VPE resident, make sure the redistributor
+	 * expects us here.
+	 */
+	if (on) {
+		int err;
+
+		err = irq_set_affinity(irq, cpumask_of(smp_processor_id()));
+		if (err) {
+			kvm_err("failed irq_set_affinity IRQ%d (%d)\n", irq, err);
+			return err;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return its_schedule_vpe(&vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe, on);
+}
+
 static struct vgic_its *vgic_get_its(struct kvm *kvm,
 				     struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *irq_entry)
 {
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
index dfac894f6f03..9ab52108989d 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -721,6 +721,8 @@ void kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
 
+	WARN_ON(vgic_v4_schedule(vcpu, false));
+
 	/* An empty ap_list_head implies used_lrs == 0 */
 	if (list_empty(&vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.ap_list_head))
 		return;
@@ -733,6 +735,8 @@ void kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 /* Flush our emulation state into the GIC hardware before entering the guest. */
 void kvm_vgic_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
+	WARN_ON(vgic_v4_schedule(vcpu, true));
+
 	/*
 	 * If there are no virtual interrupts active or pending for this
 	 * VCPU, then there is no work to do and we can bail out without
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
index 1210bf4681dc..693b654acf4d 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
@@ -234,5 +234,6 @@ int update_lpi_config(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
 bool vgic_is_v4_capable(struct kvm *kvm);
 int vgic_v4_init(struct kvm *kvm);
 void vgic_v4_teardown(struct kvm *kvm);
+int vgic_v4_schedule(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool on);
 
 #endif
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1700250 — [PATCH v3 44/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Handle MOVI applied to a VLPI

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3 44/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Handle MOVI applied to a VLPI
Message-ID<u9mPE-H2-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700219
When the guest issues a MOVI, we need to tell the physical ITS
that we're now targetting a new vcpu. This is done by extracting
the current mapping, updating the target, and reapplying the
mapping. The core ITS code should do the right thing.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index 79bac93d3e7d..aaad577ce328 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -706,6 +706,19 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_movi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
 	ite->irq->target_vcpu = vcpu;
 	spin_unlock(&ite->irq->irq_lock);
 
+	if (ite->irq->hw) {
+		struct its_vlpi_map map;
+		int ret;
+
+		ret = its_get_vlpi(ite->irq->host_irq, &map);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+
+		map.vpe_idx = vcpu->vcpu_id;
+
+		return its_map_vlpi(ite->irq->host_irq, &map);
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1700252 — [PATCH v3 48/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Handle INVALL applied to a vPE

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3 48/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Handle INVALL applied to a vPE
Message-ID<u9mPE-H2-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700219
Since when updating the properties one LPI at a time, there is no
need to perform an INV each time we read one. Instead, we rely
on the final VINVALL that gets sent to the ITS to do the work.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index 9e46081e5f15..b395df1bf47c 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static int vgic_its_save_tables_v0(struct vgic_its *its);
 static int vgic_its_restore_tables_v0(struct vgic_its *its);
 static int vgic_its_commit_v0(struct vgic_its *its);
 static int update_lpi_config(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
-			     struct kvm_vcpu *filter_vcpu);
+			     struct kvm_vcpu *filter_vcpu, bool needs_inv);
 
 /*
  * Creates a new (reference to a) struct vgic_irq for a given LPI.
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_add_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid,
 	 * However we only have those structs for mapped IRQs, so we read in
 	 * the respective config data from memory here upon mapping the LPI.
 	 */
-	ret = update_lpi_config(kvm, irq, NULL);
+	ret = update_lpi_config(kvm, irq, NULL, false);
 	if (ret)
 		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static struct its_collection *find_collection(struct vgic_its *its, int coll_id)
  * VCPU. Unconditionally applies if filter_vcpu is NULL.
  */
 static int update_lpi_config(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
-			     struct kvm_vcpu *filter_vcpu)
+			     struct kvm_vcpu *filter_vcpu, bool needs_inv)
 {
 	u64 propbase = GICR_PROPBASER_ADDRESS(kvm->arch.vgic.propbaser);
 	u8 prop;
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static int update_lpi_config(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
 	}
 
 	if (irq->hw)
-		return its_prop_update_vlpi(irq->host_irq, prop, true);
+		return its_prop_update_vlpi(irq->host_irq, prop, needs_inv);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1095,7 +1095,7 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_inv(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
 	if (!ite)
 		return E_ITS_INV_UNMAPPED_INTERRUPT;
 
-	return update_lpi_config(kvm, ite->irq, NULL);
+	return update_lpi_config(kvm, ite->irq, NULL, true);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1130,12 +1130,15 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_invall(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
 		irq = vgic_get_irq(kvm, NULL, intids[i]);
 		if (!irq)
 			continue;
-		update_lpi_config(kvm, irq, vcpu);
+		update_lpi_config(kvm, irq, vcpu, false);
 		vgic_put_irq(kvm, irq);
 	}
 
 	kfree(intids);
 
+	if (vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe.its_vm)
+		its_invall_vpe(&vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1700254 — [PATCH v3 51/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Add doorbell interrupt handling

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3 51/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Add doorbell interrupt handling
Message-ID<u9mPE-H2-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700219
When a vPE is not running, a VLPI being made pending results in a
doorbell interrupt being delivered. Let's handle this interrupt
and update the pending_last flag that indicates that VLPIs are
pending. The corresponding vcpu is also kicked into action.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
index 534d3051a078..6af3cde6d7d4 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
@@ -21,6 +21,19 @@
 
 #include "vgic.h"
 
+static irqreturn_t vgic_v4_doorbell_handler(int irq, void *info)
+{
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = info;
+
+	if (!kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(vcpu)) {
+		vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe.pending_last = true;
+		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_IRQ_PENDING, vcpu);
+		kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
+	}
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
 int vgic_v4_init(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
@@ -57,16 +70,37 @@ int vgic_v4_init(struct kvm *kvm)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
+		int irq = dist->its_vm.vpes[i]->irq;
+
+		ret = request_irq(irq, vgic_v4_doorbell_handler,
+				  0, "vcpu", vcpu);
+		if (ret) {
+			kvm_err("failed to allocate vcpu IRQ%d\n", irq);
+			dist->its_vm.nr_vpes = i;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (ret)
+		vgic_v4_teardown(kvm);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
 void vgic_v4_teardown(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	struct its_vm *its_vm = &kvm->arch.vgic.its_vm;
+	int i;
 
 	if (!its_vm->vpes)
 		return;
 
+	for (i = 0; i < its_vm->nr_vpes; i++) {
+		struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, i);
+		free_irq(its_vm->vpes[i]->irq, vcpu);
+	}
+
 	its_free_vcpu_irqs(its_vm);
 	kfree(its_vm->vpes);
 	its_vm->nr_vpes = 0;
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1703752 — Re: [PATCH v3 51/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Add doorbell interrupt handling

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-08-04 09:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 51/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Add doorbell interrupt handling
Message-ID<uaFwR-47W-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700254
On 31/07/17 18:26, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> When a vPE is not running, a VLPI being made pending results in a
> doorbell interrupt being delivered. Let's handle this interrupt
> and update the pending_last flag that indicates that VLPIs are
> pending. The corresponding vcpu is also kicked into action.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
> index 534d3051a078..6af3cde6d7d4 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,19 @@
>  
>  #include "vgic.h"
>  
> +static irqreturn_t vgic_v4_doorbell_handler(int irq, void *info)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = info;
> +
> +	if (!kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(vcpu)) {
> +		vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe.pending_last = true;
> +		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_IRQ_PENDING, vcpu);
> +		kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> +	}

This code is so obviously broken that I completely overlooked it.

If we have take a doorbell interrupt, then it means nothing was
otherwise pending (because we'd have been kicked out of the blocking
state, and will have masked the doorbell). So checking for pending
interrupts is pointless.

Furthermore, calling kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq() takes the ap_list
lock. If we take a doorbell interrupt while injecting a virtual
interrupt (from userspace, for example) on the same CPU, we end-up
in deadlock land. This would be solved by Christoffer's latest
crop of timer patches, but there is no point getting there the first
place.

The patchlet below solves it:

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
index 15feb1151797..48e4d6ebeaa8 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
@@ -94,11 +94,9 @@ static irqreturn_t vgic_v4_doorbell_handler(int irq, void *info)
 {
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = info;
 
-	if (!kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(vcpu)) {
-		vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe.pending_last = true;
-		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_IRQ_PENDING, vcpu);
-		kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
-	}
+	vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe.pending_last = true;
+	kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_IRQ_PENDING, vcpu);
+	kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }

and I've queued it for the next round.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1700255 — [PATCH v3 42/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Handle INT command applied to a VLPI

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3 42/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Handle INT command applied to a VLPI
Message-ID<u9mPF-H2-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700219
If the guest issues an INT command targetting a VLPI, let's
call into the irq_set_irqchip_state() helper to make it pending
on the physical side.

This works just as well if userspace decides to inject an interrupt
using the normal userspace API...

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index a2217f53bbe5..40aeadef33fe 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -573,6 +573,10 @@ static int vgic_its_trigger_msi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
+	if (irq->hw)
+		return irq_set_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
+					     IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING, true);
+
 	spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
 	irq->pending_latch = true;
 	vgic_queue_irq_unlock(kvm, irq);
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1700256 — [PATCH v3 46/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Handle MOVALL applied to a vPE

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3 46/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Handle MOVALL applied to a vPE
Message-ID<u9mPF-H2-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700219
The current implementation of MOVALL doesn't allow us to call
into the core ITS code as we hold a number of spinlocks.

Let's try a method used in other parts of the code, were we copy
the intids of the candicate interrupts, and then do whatever
we need to do with them outside of the critical section.

This allows us to move the interrupts one by one, at the expense
of a bit of CPU time. Who cares? MOVALL is such a stupid command
anyway...

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index 2c065c970ba0..65cc77fde609 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -1147,11 +1147,12 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_invall(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
 static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_movall(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
 				      u64 *its_cmd)
 {
-	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
 	u32 target1_addr = its_cmd_get_target_addr(its_cmd);
 	u32 target2_addr = its_cmd_mask_field(its_cmd, 3, 16, 32);
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu1, *vcpu2;
 	struct vgic_irq *irq;
+	u32 *intids;
+	int irq_count, i;
 
 	if (target1_addr >= atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus) ||
 	    target2_addr >= atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus))
@@ -1163,19 +1164,31 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_movall(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
 	vcpu1 = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, target1_addr);
 	vcpu2 = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, target2_addr);
 
-	spin_lock(&dist->lpi_list_lock);
+	irq_count = vgic_copy_lpi_list(vcpu1, &intids);
+	if (irq_count < 0)
+		return irq_count;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(irq, &dist->lpi_list_head, lpi_list) {
-		spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
+	for (i = 0; i < irq_count; i++) {
+		irq = vgic_get_irq(kvm, NULL, intids[i]);
+		if (!irq)
+			continue;
 
 		if (irq->target_vcpu == vcpu1)
 			irq->target_vcpu = vcpu2;
 
-		spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
-	}
+		if (irq->hw) {
+			struct its_vlpi_map map;
 
-	spin_unlock(&dist->lpi_list_lock);
+			if (!its_get_vlpi(irq->host_irq, &map)) {
+				map.vpe_idx = vcpu2->vcpu_id;
+				its_map_vlpi(irq->host_irq, &map);
+			}
+		}
 
+		vgic_put_irq(kvm, irq);
+	}
+
+	kfree(intids);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1700257 — [PATCH v3 56/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Prevent heterogenous systems from using GICv4

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3 56/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Prevent heterogenous systems from using GICv4
Message-ID<u9mPF-H2-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700219
The GICv4 architecture doesn't prevent CPUs implementing GICv4 to
cohabit with CPUs limited to GICv3 in the same system.

This is mad (the sheduler would have to be made aware of the v4
capability), and we're certainly not going to support this any
time soon. So let's check that all online CPUs are GICv4 capable,
and disable the functionnality if not.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h |  2 ++
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c        | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
index 1ea576c8126f..dfa4a51643d6 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
@@ -532,6 +532,8 @@
 #define ICH_VTR_SEIS_MASK		(1 << ICH_VTR_SEIS_SHIFT)
 #define ICH_VTR_A3V_SHIFT		21
 #define ICH_VTR_A3V_MASK		(1 << ICH_VTR_A3V_SHIFT)
+#define ICH_VTR_nV4_SHIFT		20
+#define ICH_VTR_nV4_MASK		(1 << ICH_VTR_nV4_SHIFT)
 
 #define ICC_IAR1_EL1_SPURIOUS		0x3ff
 
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
index 405733678c2f..252268e83ade 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
@@ -466,6 +466,18 @@ static int __init early_gicv4_enable(char *buf)
 }
 early_param("kvm-arm.vgic_v4_enable", early_gicv4_enable);
 
+static void vgic_check_v4_cpuif(void *param)
+{
+	u32 ich_vtr_el2 = kvm_call_hyp(__vgic_v3_get_ich_vtr_el2);
+	bool *v4 = param, this_cpu_is_v4;
+
+	this_cpu_is_v4 = !(ich_vtr_el2 & ICH_VTR_nV4_MASK);
+	if (!this_cpu_is_v4)
+		kvm_info("CPU%d is not GICv4 capable\n", smp_processor_id());
+
+	*v4 &= this_cpu_is_v4;
+}
+
 /**
  * vgic_v3_probe - probe for a GICv3 compatible interrupt controller in DT
  * @node:	pointer to the DT node
@@ -485,8 +497,16 @@ int vgic_v3_probe(const struct gic_kvm_info *info)
 	kvm_vgic_global_state.can_emulate_gicv2 = false;
 	kvm_vgic_global_state.ich_vtr_el2 = ich_vtr_el2;
 
-	/* GICv4 support? */
+	/*
+	 * GICv4 support? We need to check on all CPUs in case of some
+	 * extremely creative form of big-little brain damage...
+	 */
 	if (info->has_v4) {
+		int cpu;
+
+		for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+			smp_call_function_single(cpu, vgic_check_v4_cpuif,
+						 &gicv4_enable, 1);
 		kvm_vgic_global_state.has_gicv4 = gicv4_enable;
 		kvm_info("GICv4 support %sabled\n",
 			 gicv4_enable ? "en" : "dis");
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1700260 — [PATCH v3 50/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Use pending_last as a scheduling hint

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3 50/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Use pending_last as a scheduling hint
Message-ID<u9mPF-H2-49@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700219
When a vPE exits, the pending_last flag is set when there are
pending VLPIs stored in the pending table. Similarily, we set
this flag when a doorbell interrupt fires, as it indicates the
same condition.

Let's update kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq() to account for that
flag as well, making a vcpu runnable when set.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
index a96e566905d2..dfac894f6f03 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -781,6 +781,9 @@ int kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.enabled)
 		return false;
 
+	if (vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe.pending_last)
+		return true;
+
 	spin_lock(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock);
 
 	list_for_each_entry(irq, &vgic_cpu->ap_list_head, ap_list) {
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1700261 — [PATCH v3 57/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Theory of operations

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3 57/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Theory of operations
Message-ID<u9mPF-H2-47@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700219
Yet another braindump so I can free some cells...

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
index 0a8deefbcf1c..0c002d2be620 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
@@ -22,6 +22,74 @@
 
 #include "vgic.h"
 
+/*
+ * How KVM uses GICv4 (insert rude comments here):
+ *
+ * The vgic-v4 layer acts as a bridge between several entities:
+ * - The GICv4 ITS representation offered by the ITS driver
+ * - VFIO, which is in charge of the PCI endpoint
+ * - The virtual ITS, which is the only thing the guest sees
+ *
+ * The configuration of VLPIs is triggered by a callback from VFIO,
+ * instructing KVM that a PCI device has been configured to deliver
+ * MSIs to a vITS.
+ *
+ * kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding() is thus called with the routing entry,
+ * and this is used to find the corresponding vITS data structures
+ * (ITS instance, device, event and irq) using a process that is
+ * extremely similar to the injection of an MSI.
+ *
+ * At this stage, we can link the guest's view of an LPI (uniquely
+ * identified by the routing entry) and the host irq, using the GICv4
+ * driver mapping operation. Should the mapping succeed, we've then
+ * successfully upgraded the guest's LPI to a VLPI. We can then start
+ * with updating GICv4's view of the property table and generating an
+ * INValidation in order to kickstart the delivery of this VLPI to the
+ * guest directly, without software intervention. Well, almost.
+ *
+ * When the PCI endpoint is deconfigured, this operation is reversed
+ * with VFIO calling kvm_vgic_v4_unset_forwarding().
+ *
+ * Once the VLPI has been mapped, it needs to follow any change the
+ * guest performs on its LPI through the vITS. For that, a number of
+ * command handlers have hooks to communicate these changes to the HW:
+ * - Any invalidation triggers a call to its_prop_update_vlpi()
+ * - The INT command results in a irq_set_irqchip_state(), which
+ *   generates an INT on the corresponding VLPI.
+ * - The CLEAR command results in a irq_set_irqchip_state(), which
+ *   generates an CLEAR on the corresponding VLPI.
+ * - DISCARD translates into an unmap, similar to a call to
+ *   kvm_vgic_v4_unset_forwarding().
+ * - MOVI is translated by an update of the existing mapping, changing
+ *   the target vcpu, resulting in a VMOVI being generated.
+ * - MOVALL is translated by a string of mapping updates (similar to
+ *   the handling of MOVI). MOVALL is horrible.
+ *
+ * Note that a DISCARD/MAPTI sequence emitted from the guest without
+ * reprogramming the PCI endpoint after MAPTI does not result in a
+ * VLPI being mapped, as there is no callback from VFIO (the guest
+ * will get the interrupt via the normal SW injection). Fixing this is
+ * not trivial, and requires some horrible messing with the VFIO
+ * internals. Not fun. Don't do that.
+ *
+ * Then there is the scheduling. Each time a vcpu is about to run on a
+ * physical CPU, KVM must tell the corresponding redistributor about
+ * it. And if we've migrated our vcpu from one CPU to another, we must
+ * tell the ITS (so that the messages reach the right redistributor).
+ * This is done in two steps: first issue a irq_set_affinity() on the
+ * irq corresponding to the vcpu, then call its_schedule_vpe(). You
+ * must be in a non-preemptible context. On exit, another call to
+ * its_schedule_vpe() tells the redistributor that we're done with the
+ * vcpu.
+ *
+ * Finally, the doorbell handling: Each vcpu is allocated an interrupt
+ * which will fire each time a VLPI is made pending whilst the vcpu is
+ * not running. Each time the vcpu gets blocked, the doorbell
+ * interrupt gets enabled. When the vcpu is unblocked (for whatever
+ * reason), the doorbell interrupt is disabled. This behaviour is
+ * pretty similar to that of the backgroud timer.
+ */
+
 static irqreturn_t vgic_v4_doorbell_handler(int irq, void *info)
 {
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = info;
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1700267 — [PATCH v3 38/59] KVM: arm/arm64: vITS: Add MSI translation helpers

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3 38/59] KVM: arm/arm64: vITS: Add MSI translation helpers
Message-ID<u9n8Z-NK-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700219
The whole MSI injection process is fairly monolithic. An MSI write
gets turned into an injected LPI in one swift go. But this is actually
a more fine-grained process:

- First, a virtual ITS gets selected using the doorbell address
- Then the DevID/EventID pair gets translated into an LPI
- Finally the LPI is injected

Since the GICv4 code needs the first two steps in order to match
an IRQ routing entry to an LPI, let's expose them as helpers,
and refactor the existing code to use them

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h     |  4 ++
 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index aa6b68db80b4..fb7be8673bff 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -504,15 +504,8 @@ static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_its_idregs(struct kvm *kvm,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/*
- * Find the target VCPU and the LPI number for a given devid/eventid pair
- * and make this IRQ pending, possibly injecting it.
- * Must be called with the its_lock mutex held.
- * Returns 0 on success, a positive error value for any ITS mapping
- * related errors and negative error values for generic errors.
- */
-static int vgic_its_trigger_msi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
-				u32 devid, u32 eventid)
+int vgic_its_resolve_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
+			 u32 devid, u32 eventid, struct vgic_irq **irq)
 {
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	struct its_ite *ite;
@@ -531,26 +524,60 @@ static int vgic_its_trigger_msi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
 	if (!vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.lpis_enabled)
 		return -EBUSY;
 
-	spin_lock(&ite->irq->irq_lock);
-	ite->irq->pending_latch = true;
-	vgic_queue_irq_unlock(kvm, ite->irq);
-
+	*irq = ite->irq;
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static struct vgic_io_device *vgic_get_its_iodev(struct kvm_io_device *dev)
+struct vgic_its *vgic_msi_to_its(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msi *msi)
 {
+	u64 address;
+	struct kvm_io_device *kvm_io_dev;
 	struct vgic_io_device *iodev;
 
-	if (dev->ops != &kvm_io_gic_ops)
-		return NULL;
+	if (!vgic_has_its(kvm))
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
 
-	iodev = container_of(dev, struct vgic_io_device, dev);
+	if (!(msi->flags & KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID))
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+	address = (u64)msi->address_hi << 32 | msi->address_lo;
+
+	kvm_io_dev = kvm_io_bus_get_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS, address);
+	if (!kvm_io_dev)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
+	if (kvm_io_dev->ops != &kvm_io_gic_ops)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+	iodev = container_of(kvm_io_dev, struct vgic_io_device, dev);
 	if (iodev->iodev_type != IODEV_ITS)
-		return NULL;
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
-	return iodev;
+	return iodev->its;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Find the target VCPU and the LPI number for a given devid/eventid pair
+ * and make this IRQ pending, possibly injecting it.
+ * Must be called with the its_lock mutex held.
+ * Returns 0 on success, a positive error value for any ITS mapping
+ * related errors and negative error values for generic errors.
+ */
+static int vgic_its_trigger_msi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
+				u32 devid, u32 eventid)
+{
+	struct vgic_irq *irq = NULL;
+	int err;
+
+	err = vgic_its_resolve_lpi(kvm, its, devid, eventid, &irq);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
+	irq->pending_latch = true;
+	vgic_queue_irq_unlock(kvm, irq);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -561,30 +588,16 @@ static struct vgic_io_device *vgic_get_its_iodev(struct kvm_io_device *dev)
  */
 int vgic_its_inject_msi(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msi *msi)
 {
-	u64 address;
-	struct kvm_io_device *kvm_io_dev;
-	struct vgic_io_device *iodev;
+	struct vgic_its *its;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!vgic_has_its(kvm))
-		return -ENODEV;
-
-	if (!(msi->flags & KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	address = (u64)msi->address_hi << 32 | msi->address_lo;
-
-	kvm_io_dev = kvm_io_bus_get_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS, address);
-	if (!kvm_io_dev)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	its = vgic_msi_to_its(kvm, msi);
+	if (IS_ERR(its))
+		return PTR_ERR(its);
 
-	iodev = vgic_get_its_iodev(kvm_io_dev);
-	if (!iodev)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	mutex_lock(&iodev->its->its_lock);
-	ret = vgic_its_trigger_msi(kvm, iodev->its, msi->devid, msi->data);
-	mutex_unlock(&iodev->its->its_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&its->its_lock);
+	ret = vgic_its_trigger_msi(kvm, its, msi->devid, msi->data);
+	mutex_unlock(&its->its_lock);
 
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
index da254ae29aec..3002b72d938b 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
@@ -225,4 +225,8 @@ int vgic_debug_destroy(struct kvm *kvm);
 bool lock_all_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm);
 void unlock_all_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm);
 
+int vgic_its_resolve_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
+			 u32 devid, u32 eventid, struct vgic_irq **irq);
+struct vgic_its *vgic_msi_to_its(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msi *msi);
+
 #endif
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1700270 — [PATCH v3 32/59] irqchip/gic-v4: Add VLPI configuration interface

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3 32/59] irqchip/gic-v4: Add VLPI configuration interface
Message-ID<u9n8Z-NK-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700219
Add the required interfaces to map, unmap and update a VLPI.

Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v4.c       | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h |  4 ++++
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v4.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v4.c
index 86b46fb532ab..6fe2e09172ed 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v4.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v4.c
@@ -96,3 +96,45 @@ int its_invall_vpe(struct its_vpe *vpe)
 
 	return its_send_vpe_cmd(vpe, &info);
 }
+
+int its_map_vlpi(int irq, struct its_vlpi_map *map)
+{
+	struct its_cmd_info info = {
+		.cmd_type = MAP_VLPI,
+		.map      = map,
+	};
+
+	/*
+	 * The host will never see that interrupt firing again, so it
+	 * is vital that we don't do any lazy masking.
+	 */
+	irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY);
+
+	return irq_set_vcpu_affinity(irq, &info);
+}
+
+int its_get_vlpi(int irq, struct its_vlpi_map *map)
+{
+	struct its_cmd_info info = {
+		.cmd_type = GET_VLPI,
+		.map      = map,
+	};
+
+	return irq_set_vcpu_affinity(irq, &info);
+}
+
+int its_unmap_vlpi(int irq)
+{
+	irq_clear_status_flags(irq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY);
+	return irq_set_vcpu_affinity(irq, NULL);
+}
+
+int its_prop_update_vlpi(int irq, u8 config, bool inv)
+{
+	struct its_cmd_info info = {
+		.cmd_type = inv ? PROP_UPDATE_AND_INV_VLPI : PROP_UPDATE_VLPI,
+		.config   = config,
+	};
+
+	return irq_set_vcpu_affinity(irq, &info);
+}
diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h
index faaafd12d8c7..f495d4d1f7d7 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h
@@ -93,5 +93,9 @@ int its_alloc_vcpu_irqs(struct its_vm *vm);
 void its_free_vcpu_irqs(struct its_vm *vm);
 int its_schedule_vpe(struct its_vpe *vpe, bool on);
 int its_invall_vpe(struct its_vpe *vpe);
+int its_map_vlpi(int irq, struct its_vlpi_map *map);
+int its_get_vlpi(int irq, struct its_vlpi_map *map);
+int its_unmap_vlpi(int irq);
+int its_prop_update_vlpi(int irq, u8 config, bool inv);
 
 #endif
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1700271 — [PATCH v3 08/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Split out property table allocation

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3 08/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Split out property table allocation
Message-ID<u9n90-NK-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700219
Move the LPI property table allocation into its own function, as
this is going to be required for those associated with VMs in
the future.

Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index 3e4ac8c13e21..039626d21a73 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -899,13 +899,32 @@ static void its_lpi_free(struct event_lpi_map *map)
 	kfree(map->col_map);
 }
 
+static struct page *its_allocate_prop_table(gfp_t gfp_flags)
+{
+	struct page *prop_page;
+
+	prop_page = alloc_pages(gfp_flags, get_order(LPI_PROPBASE_SZ));
+	if (!prop_page)
+		return NULL;
+
+	/* Priority 0xa0, Group-1, disabled */
+	memset(page_address(prop_page),
+	       LPI_PROP_DEFAULT_PRIO | LPI_PROP_GROUP1,
+	       LPI_PROPBASE_SZ);
+
+	/* Make sure the GIC will observe the written configuration */
+	gic_flush_dcache_to_poc(page_address(prop_page), LPI_PROPBASE_SZ);
+
+	return prop_page;
+}
+
+
 static int __init its_alloc_lpi_tables(void)
 {
 	phys_addr_t paddr;
 
 	lpi_id_bits = min_t(u32, gic_rdists->id_bits, ITS_MAX_LPI_NRBITS);
-	gic_rdists->prop_page = alloc_pages(GFP_NOWAIT,
-					   get_order(LPI_PROPBASE_SZ));
+	gic_rdists->prop_page = its_allocate_prop_table(GFP_NOWAIT);
 	if (!gic_rdists->prop_page) {
 		pr_err("Failed to allocate PROPBASE\n");
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -914,14 +933,6 @@ static int __init its_alloc_lpi_tables(void)
 	paddr = page_to_phys(gic_rdists->prop_page);
 	pr_info("GIC: using LPI property table @%pa\n", &paddr);
 
-	/* Priority 0xa0, Group-1, disabled */
-	memset(page_address(gic_rdists->prop_page),
-	       LPI_PROP_DEFAULT_PRIO | LPI_PROP_GROUP1,
-	       LPI_PROPBASE_SZ);
-
-	/* Make sure the GIC will observe the written configuration */
-	gic_flush_dcache_to_poc(page_address(gic_rdists->prop_page), LPI_PROPBASE_SZ);
-
 	return its_lpi_init(lpi_id_bits);
 }
 
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1700272 — [PATCH v3 30/59] irqchip/gic-v4: Add per-VM VPE domain creation

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3 30/59] irqchip/gic-v4: Add per-VM VPE domain creation
Message-ID<u9n90-NK-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700219
When creating a VM, it is very convenient to have an irq domain
containing all the doorbell interrupts associated with that VM
(each interrupt representing a VPE).

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v4.c       | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h |  3 ++
 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v4.c

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v4.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v4.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f7fe6181ec8d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v4.c
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2016,2017 ARM Limited, All Rights Reserved.
+ * Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
+#include <linux/msi.h>
+
+#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h>
+
+static struct irq_domain *gic_domain;
+static const struct irq_domain_ops *vpe_domain_ops;
+
+int its_alloc_vcpu_irqs(struct its_vm *vm)
+{
+	int vpe_base_irq, i;
+
+	vm->fwnode = irq_domain_alloc_named_id_fwnode("GICv4-vpe",
+						      task_pid_nr(current));
+	if (!vm->fwnode)
+		goto err;
+
+	vm->domain = irq_domain_create_hierarchy(gic_domain, 0, vm->nr_vpes,
+						 vm->fwnode, vpe_domain_ops,
+						 vm);
+	if (!vm->domain)
+		goto err;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < vm->nr_vpes; i++) {
+		vm->vpes[i]->its_vm = vm;
+		vm->vpes[i]->idai = true;
+	}
+
+	vpe_base_irq = __irq_domain_alloc_irqs(vm->domain, -1, vm->nr_vpes,
+					       NUMA_NO_NODE, vm,
+					       false, NULL);
+	if (vpe_base_irq <= 0)
+		goto err;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < vm->nr_vpes; i++)
+		vm->vpes[i]->irq = vpe_base_irq + i;
+
+	return 0;
+
+err:
+	if (vm->domain)
+		irq_domain_remove(vm->domain);
+	if (vm->fwnode)
+		irq_domain_free_fwnode(vm->fwnode);
+
+	return -ENOMEM;
+}
+
+void its_free_vcpu_irqs(struct its_vm *vm)
+{
+	irq_domain_free_irqs(vm->vpes[0]->irq, vm->nr_vpes);
+	irq_domain_remove(vm->domain);
+	irq_domain_free_fwnode(vm->fwnode);
+}
diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h
index 5ba0fb6b094d..b31fb8aeba03 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h
@@ -89,4 +89,7 @@ struct its_cmd_info {
 	};
 };
 
+int its_alloc_vcpu_irqs(struct its_vm *vm);
+void its_free_vcpu_irqs(struct its_vm *vm);
+
 #endif
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1700274 — [PATCH v3 36/59] KVM: arm: Select ARM_GIC_V3 and ARM_GIC_V3_ITS

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3 36/59] KVM: arm: Select ARM_GIC_V3 and ARM_GIC_V3_ITS
Message-ID<u9n90-NK-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700219
The GICv4 support introduces a hard dependency between the KVM
core and the ITS infrastructure. arm64 already selects it at
the architecture level, but 32bit doesn't. In order to avoid
littering the kernel with #ifdefs, let's just select the whole
of the GICv3 suport code.

You know you want it.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig
index 4e2b192a030a..52b50af04e3b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ config KVM
 	select PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS
 	select ANON_INODES
 	select ARM_GIC
+	select ARM_GIC_V3
+	select ARM_GIC_V3_ITS
 	select HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT
 	select HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL
 	select KVM_MMIO
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1700275 — [PATCH v3 09/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Allow use of indirect VCPU tables

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-07-31 20:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3 09/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Allow use of indirect VCPU tables
Message-ID<u9n90-NK-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1700219
The VCPU tables can be quite sparse as well, and it makes sense
to use indirect tables as well if possible.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index 039626d21a73..9a317934455c 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -1071,10 +1071,13 @@ static int its_setup_baser(struct its_node *its, struct its_baser *baser,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static bool its_parse_baser_device(struct its_node *its, struct its_baser *baser,
-				   u32 psz, u32 *order)
+static bool its_parse_indirect_baser(struct its_node *its,
+				     struct its_baser *baser,
+				     u32 psz, u32 *order)
 {
-	u64 esz = GITS_BASER_ENTRY_SIZE(its_read_baser(its, baser));
+	u64 tmp = its_read_baser(its, baser);
+	u64 type = GITS_BASER_TYPE(tmp);
+	u64 esz = GITS_BASER_ENTRY_SIZE(tmp);
 	u64 val = GITS_BASER_InnerShareable | GITS_BASER_RaWaWb;
 	u32 ids = its->device_ids;
 	u32 new_order = *order;
@@ -1113,8 +1116,9 @@ static bool its_parse_baser_device(struct its_node *its, struct its_baser *baser
 	if (new_order >= MAX_ORDER) {
 		new_order = MAX_ORDER - 1;
 		ids = ilog2(PAGE_ORDER_TO_SIZE(new_order) / (int)esz);
-		pr_warn("ITS@%pa: Device Table too large, reduce ids %u->%u\n",
-			&its->phys_base, its->device_ids, ids);
+		pr_warn("ITS@%pa: %s Table too large, reduce ids %u->%u\n",
+			&its->phys_base, its_base_type_string[type],
+			its->device_ids, ids);
 	}
 
 	*order = new_order;
@@ -1162,11 +1166,16 @@ static int its_alloc_tables(struct its_node *its)
 		u32 order = get_order(psz);
 		bool indirect = false;
 
-		if (type == GITS_BASER_TYPE_NONE)
+		switch (type) {
+		case GITS_BASER_TYPE_NONE:
 			continue;
 
-		if (type == GITS_BASER_TYPE_DEVICE)
-			indirect = its_parse_baser_device(its, baser, psz, &order);
+		case GITS_BASER_TYPE_DEVICE:
+		case GITS_BASER_TYPE_VCPU:
+			indirect = its_parse_indirect_baser(its, baser,
+							    psz, &order);
+			break;
+		}
 
 		err = its_setup_baser(its, baser, cache, shr, psz, order, indirect);
 		if (err < 0) {
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web