Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1695953 > unrolled thread

Re: USB disk speed regression WD Elements - with bisect result 22547c4cc4fe20698a6a85a55b8788859134b8e4

Started byAlan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
First post2017-07-25 19:10 +0200
Last post2017-07-25 19:10 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: USB disk speed regression WD Elements - with bisect result  22547c4cc4fe20698a6a85a55b8788859134b8e4 Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-07-25 19:10 +0200

#1695953 — Re: USB disk speed regression WD Elements - with bisect result 22547c4cc4fe20698a6a85a55b8788859134b8e4

FromAlan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date2017-07-25 19:10 +0200
SubjectRe: USB disk speed regression WD Elements - with bisect result 22547c4cc4fe20698a6a85a55b8788859134b8e4
Message-ID<u7bvk-5B8-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Tue, 25 Jul 2017, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:

> And in fact it's the very same commit - which adds this message
> (just check current 4.13 with and without this commit reverted)
> 
> So here goes usbmon trace (aka  'cat /sys/kernel/debug/usb/usbmon/0u')
> no other usb device has been touch so should not hopefully interfere here.
> 
> Trace is from 4.12 kernel - so it has reported  "not running at top speed"

Can you collect an equivalent trace under 4.8?

Alan Stern

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web