Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1697740 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-27 08:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-07-31 14:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] userfaultfd_zeropage: return -ENOSPC in case mm has gone Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-27 08:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] userfaultfd_zeropage: return -ENOSPC in case mm has gone Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-07-31 14:30 +0200
| From | Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-27 08:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] userfaultfd_zeropage: return -ENOSPC in case mm has gone |
| Message-ID | <u7Kt4-2Ab-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
In the non-cooperative userfaultfd case, the process exit may race with
outstanding mcopy_atomic called by the uffd monitor. Returning -ENOSPC
instead of -EINVAL when mm is already gone will allow uffd monitor to
distinguish this case from other error conditions.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 96333187ab162 ("userfaultfd_copy: return -ENOSPC in case mm has gone")
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Unfortunately, I've overlooked userfaultfd_zeropage when I updated
userfaultd_copy :(
fs/userfaultfd.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index cadcd12a3d35..2d8c2d848668 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -1643,6 +1643,8 @@ static int userfaultfd_zeropage(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
ret = mfill_zeropage(ctx->mm, uffdio_zeropage.range.start,
uffdio_zeropage.range.len);
mmput(ctx->mm);
+ } else {
+ return -ENOSPC;
}
if (unlikely(put_user(ret, &user_uffdio_zeropage->zeropage)))
return -EFAULT;
--
2.7.4
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-31 14:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u9hZF-6eS-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1697740 |
On Thu 27-07-17 09:26:59, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> In the non-cooperative userfaultfd case, the process exit may race with
> outstanding mcopy_atomic called by the uffd monitor. Returning -ENOSPC
> instead of -EINVAL when mm is already gone will allow uffd monitor to
> distinguish this case from other error conditions.
Normally we tend to return ESRCH in such case. ENOSPC sounds rather
confusing...
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 96333187ab162 ("userfaultfd_copy: return -ENOSPC in case mm has gone")
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> Unfortunately, I've overlooked userfaultfd_zeropage when I updated
> userfaultd_copy :(
>
> fs/userfaultfd.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
> index cadcd12a3d35..2d8c2d848668 100644
> --- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
> +++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
> @@ -1643,6 +1643,8 @@ static int userfaultfd_zeropage(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
> ret = mfill_zeropage(ctx->mm, uffdio_zeropage.range.start,
> uffdio_zeropage.range.len);
> mmput(ctx->mm);
> + } else {
> + return -ENOSPC;
> }
> if (unlikely(put_user(ret, &user_uffdio_zeropage->zeropage)))
> return -EFAULT;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web