Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1695371 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v5 2/2] x86/mm: Improve TLB flush documentation

Started byAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
First post2017-07-25 06:50 +0200
Last post2017-07-25 12:10 +0200
Articles 4 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH v5 2/2] x86/mm: Improve TLB flush documentation Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-07-25 06:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] x86/mm: Improve TLB flush documentation Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 06:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] x86/mm: Improve TLB flush documentation Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-07-25 07:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] x86/mm: Improve TLB flush documentation Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-25 12:10 +0200

#1695371 — [PATCH v5 2/2] x86/mm: Improve TLB flush documentation

FromAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Date2017-07-25 06:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH v5 2/2] x86/mm: Improve TLB flush documentation
Message-ID<u6ZXb-6Gy-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Improve comments as requested by PeterZ and also add some
documentation at the top of the file.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index ce104b962a17..d4ee781ca656 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -15,17 +15,24 @@
 #include <linux/debugfs.h>
 
 /*
- *	TLB flushing, formerly SMP-only
- *		c/o Linus Torvalds.
+ * The code in this file handles mm switches and TLB flushes.
  *
- *	These mean you can really definitely utterly forget about
- *	writing to user space from interrupts. (Its not allowed anyway).
+ * An mm's TLB state is logically represented by a totally ordered sequence
+ * of TLB flushes.  Each flush increments the mm's tlb_gen.
  *
- *	Optimizations Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
+ * Each CPU that might have an mm in its TLB (and that might ever use
+ * those TLB entries) will have an entry for it in its cpu_tlbstate.ctxs
+ * array.  The kernel maintains the following invariant: for each CPU and
+ * for each mm in its cpu_tlbstate.ctxs array, the CPU has performed all
+ * flushes in that mms history up to the tlb_gen in cpu_tlbstate.ctxs
+ * or the CPU has performed an equivalent set of flushes.
  *
- *	More scalable flush, from Andi Kleen
- *
- *	Implement flush IPI by CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR, Alex Shi
+ * For this purpose, an equivalent set is a set that is at least as strong.
+ * So, for example, if the flush history is a full flush at time 1,
+ * a full flush after time 1 is sufficient, but a full flush before time 1
+ * is not.  Similarly, any number of flushes can be replaced by a single
+ * full flush so long as that replacement flush is after all the flushes
+ * that it's replacing.
  */
 
 atomic64_t last_mm_ctx_id = ATOMIC64_INIT(1);
@@ -138,7 +145,16 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
 			return;
 		}
 
-		/* Resume remote flushes and then read tlb_gen. */
+		/*
+		 * Resume remote flushes and then read tlb_gen.  The
+		 * implied barrier in atomic64_read() synchronizes
+		 * with inc_mm_tlb_gen() like this:
+		 *
+		 * switch_mm_irqs_off():	flush request:
+		 *  cpumask_set_cpu(...);	 inc_mm_tlb_gen();
+		 *  MB				 MB
+		 *  atomic64_read(.tlb_gen);	 flush_tlb_others(mm_cpumask());
+		 */
 		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
 		next_tlb_gen = atomic64_read(&next->context.tlb_gen);
 
@@ -186,7 +202,14 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
 		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next)));
 
 		/*
-		 * Start remote flushes and then read tlb_gen.
+		 * Start remote flushes and then read tlb_gen.  As
+		 * above, the implied barrier in atomic64_read()
+		 * synchronizes with inc_mm_tlb_gen() like this:
+		 *
+		 * switch_mm_irqs_off():	flush request:
+		 *  cpumask_set_cpu(...);	 inc_mm_tlb_gen();
+		 *  MB				 MB
+		 *  atomic64_read(.tlb_gen);	 flush_tlb_others(mm_cpumask());
 		 */
 		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
 		next_tlb_gen = atomic64_read(&next->context.tlb_gen);
-- 
2.9.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1695375

FromNadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Date2017-07-25 06:50 +0200
Message-ID<u6ZXb-6Gy-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1695371
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:

> Improve comments as requested by PeterZ and also add some
> documentation at the top of the file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> index ce104b962a17..d4ee781ca656 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> @@ -15,17 +15,24 @@
> #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> 
> /*
> - *	TLB flushing, formerly SMP-only
> - *		c/o Linus Torvalds.
> + * The code in this file handles mm switches and TLB flushes.
>  *
> - *	These mean you can really definitely utterly forget about
> - *	writing to user space from interrupts. (Its not allowed anyway).
> + * An mm's TLB state is logically represented by a totally ordered sequence
> + * of TLB flushes.  Each flush increments the mm's tlb_gen.
>  *
> - *	Optimizations Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
> + * Each CPU that might have an mm in its TLB (and that might ever use
> + * those TLB entries) will have an entry for it in its cpu_tlbstate.ctxs
> + * array.  The kernel maintains the following invariant: for each CPU and
> + * for each mm in its cpu_tlbstate.ctxs array, the CPU has performed all
> + * flushes in that mms history up to the tlb_gen in cpu_tlbstate.ctxs
> + * or the CPU has performed an equivalent set of flushes.
>  *
> - *	More scalable flush, from Andi Kleen
> - *
> - *	Implement flush IPI by CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR, Alex Shi
> + * For this purpose, an equivalent set is a set that is at least as strong.
> + * So, for example, if the flush history is a full flush at time 1,
> + * a full flush after time 1 is sufficient, but a full flush before time 1
> + * is not.  Similarly, any number of flushes can be replaced by a single
> + * full flush so long as that replacement flush is after all the flushes
> + * that it's replacing.
>  */
> 
> atomic64_t last_mm_ctx_id = ATOMIC64_INIT(1);
> @@ -138,7 +145,16 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
> 			return;
> 		}
> 
> -		/* Resume remote flushes and then read tlb_gen. */
> +		/*
> +		 * Resume remote flushes and then read tlb_gen.  The
> +		 * implied barrier in atomic64_read() synchronizes
> +		 * with inc_mm_tlb_gen() like this:

You mean the implied memory barrier in cpumask_set_cpu(), no?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1695394

FromAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Date2017-07-25 07:50 +0200
Message-ID<u70Tf-7fI-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1695375
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> wrote:
> Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> Improve comments as requested by PeterZ and also add some
>> documentation at the top of the file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
>> index ce104b962a17..d4ee781ca656 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
>> @@ -15,17 +15,24 @@
>> #include <linux/debugfs.h>
>>
>> /*
>> - *   TLB flushing, formerly SMP-only
>> - *           c/o Linus Torvalds.
>> + * The code in this file handles mm switches and TLB flushes.
>>  *
>> - *   These mean you can really definitely utterly forget about
>> - *   writing to user space from interrupts. (Its not allowed anyway).
>> + * An mm's TLB state is logically represented by a totally ordered sequence
>> + * of TLB flushes.  Each flush increments the mm's tlb_gen.
>>  *
>> - *   Optimizations Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
>> + * Each CPU that might have an mm in its TLB (and that might ever use
>> + * those TLB entries) will have an entry for it in its cpu_tlbstate.ctxs
>> + * array.  The kernel maintains the following invariant: for each CPU and
>> + * for each mm in its cpu_tlbstate.ctxs array, the CPU has performed all
>> + * flushes in that mms history up to the tlb_gen in cpu_tlbstate.ctxs
>> + * or the CPU has performed an equivalent set of flushes.
>>  *
>> - *   More scalable flush, from Andi Kleen
>> - *
>> - *   Implement flush IPI by CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR, Alex Shi
>> + * For this purpose, an equivalent set is a set that is at least as strong.
>> + * So, for example, if the flush history is a full flush at time 1,
>> + * a full flush after time 1 is sufficient, but a full flush before time 1
>> + * is not.  Similarly, any number of flushes can be replaced by a single
>> + * full flush so long as that replacement flush is after all the flushes
>> + * that it's replacing.
>>  */
>>
>> atomic64_t last_mm_ctx_id = ATOMIC64_INIT(1);
>> @@ -138,7 +145,16 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
>>                       return;
>>               }
>>
>> -             /* Resume remote flushes and then read tlb_gen. */
>> +             /*
>> +              * Resume remote flushes and then read tlb_gen.  The
>> +              * implied barrier in atomic64_read() synchronizes
>> +              * with inc_mm_tlb_gen() like this:
>
> You mean the implied memory barrier in cpumask_set_cpu(), no?
>


Ugh, yes.  And I misread PeterZ's email and incorrectly removed the
smp_mb__after_atomic().  I'll respin this patch.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1695562

FromPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date2017-07-25 12:10 +0200
Message-ID<u74WR-1sj-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1695371
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 09:41:39PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> +		/*
> +		 * Resume remote flushes and then read tlb_gen.  The
> +		 * implied barrier in atomic64_read() synchronizes

There is no barrier in atomic64_read().

> +		 * with inc_mm_tlb_gen() like this:
> +		 *
> +		 * switch_mm_irqs_off():	flush request:
> +		 *  cpumask_set_cpu(...);	 inc_mm_tlb_gen();
> +		 *  MB				 MB
> +		 *  atomic64_read(.tlb_gen);	 flush_tlb_others(mm_cpumask());
> +		 */
>  		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
>  		next_tlb_gen = atomic64_read(&next->context.tlb_gen);
>  

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web