Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1693230 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/3] platform/x86: Add GLK PSS Event Table

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/3] platform/x86: Add GLK PSS Event Table Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2017-07-20 23:10 +0200
    RE: [PATCH 1/3] platform/x86: Add GLK PSS Event Table "Chakravarty, Souvik K" <souvik.k.chakravarty@intel.com> - 2017-07-21 05:30 +0200

#1693230 — Re: [PATCH 1/3] platform/x86: Add GLK PSS Event Table

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:18:54AM +0000, Chakravarty, Souvik K wrote:
> +1 From me.

Souvik, as the listed maintainer for this driver, what I require from
you is a complete Acked-by or a Reviewed-by line, preferably the latter,
and preferably after an actual review with comments. +1 has no semantic
meaning in the Linux kernel development process, and one line approvals,
especially from the same company, have little incremental value.

For details, please see:
Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
Documentation/submitting-patches.rst

Thanks,

-- 
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1693360

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@infradead.org]
> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 2:36 AM
> To: Chakravarty, Souvik K <souvik.k.chakravarty@intel.com>
> Cc: Bhardwaj, Rajneesh <rajneesh.bhardwaj@intel.com>; platform-driver-
> x86@vger.kernel.org; andy@infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> Murthy, Shanth <shanth.murthy@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] platform/x86: Add GLK PSS Event Table
> 
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:18:54AM +0000, Chakravarty, Souvik K wrote:
> > +1 From me.
> 
> Souvik, as the listed maintainer for this driver, what I require from you is a
> complete Acked-by or a Reviewed-by line, preferably the latter, and
> preferably after an actual review with comments. +1 has no semantic
> meaning in the Linux kernel development process, and one line approvals,
> especially from the same company, have little incremental value.
> 
> For details, please see:
> Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
> Documentation/submitting-patches.rst

Thanks Darren...my mistake :(
Will do.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --
> Darren Hart
> VMware Open Source Technology Center

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web