Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1694037 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: OF: Use pr_debug() instead of pr_err() while adding OPP table

Started by"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
First post2017-07-22 00:50 +0200
Last post2017-07-22 00:50 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: OF: Use pr_debug() instead of pr_err() while adding OPP table "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-07-22 00:50 +0200

#1694037 — Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: OF: Use pr_debug() instead of pr_err() while adding OPP table

From"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Date2017-07-22 00:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PM / OPP: OF: Use pr_debug() instead of pr_err() while adding OPP table
Message-ID<u5OUa-2dk-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 11:10:14 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/12, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Some platforms add the OPPs dynamically from platform specific drivers
> > instead of getting them statically from DT. The cpufreq-dt driver
> > already ignores the return value of dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table() to
> > not error out for such cases, but we still end up printing error message
> > from that routine. That's not nice.
> > 
> > Convert the print message to use pr_debug() instead.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr>
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > ---
> 
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>

Applied, thanks!

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web