Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1693921 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-21 20:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-07-21 21:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Differentiate between Bay and Cherry Trail CRC variants Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> - 2017-07-21 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Differentiate between Bay and Cherry Trail CRC variants Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2017-07-21 21:30 +0200
| From | Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-21 20:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Differentiate between Bay and Cherry Trail CRC variants |
| Message-ID | <u5L9T-8mY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi, On 18-07-17 09:17, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 11:59 +0100, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Sat, 01 Jul 2017, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> >>>> Both Bay and Cherry Trail devices may be used together with a >>>> Crystal Cove >>>> PMIC. Each platform has its own variant of the PMIC, which both use >>>> the >>>> same ACPI HID, but they are not 100% compatible. >>>> >>>> This commits makes the intel_soc_pmic_core code check the _HRV of >>>> the >>>> ACPI-firmware-node and selects intel_soc_pmic_config_byt_crc resp. >>>> intel_soc_pmic_config_cht_crc based on this. >>>> >>>> This fixes the Bay Trail specific ACPI OpRegion code causing >>>> problems >>>> on Cherry Trail devices. Specifically this was causing the external >>>> microsd slot on a Dell Venue 8 5855 (Cherry Trail version) to not >>>> work >>>> and the eMMC to become unreliable and throw lots of errors. >>>> >>>> Reported-and-tested-by: russianneuromancer <russianneuromancer@ya.ru >>>>> >>> >>> Real names only please. >>> >>> What is the name of this reporter/tester? >> >> No one knows, I think. > > Then I don't think we can credit him/her for their efforts. > SubmittingPatches clearly states "no pseudonyms or anonymous > contributions". Either write to them and ask for their real name so > that they can be credited, or remove the line. russianneuromancer has been a great help with reporting and testing many Bay Trail / Cherry Trail issues. He does not want to use his real name. AFAIK the Real Name rule only applies tot he Signed-off-by tag, no other subsys-maintainers have had problems with listing him as reporter / tester using his alias. The Real Name only rule is part of "11) Sign your work — the Developer’s Certificate of Origin" of : https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin Which is all about the S-o-b tag. If you despite this still want a new version with russianneuromancer's Reported-and-tested-by dropped let me know and I will send a new version. Regards, Hans
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-21 21:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u5LMC-ou-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1693921 |
On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 20:41 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > On 18-07-17 09:17, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 11:59 +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > On Sat, 01 Jul 2017, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > > > > > > > Reported-and-tested-by: russianneuromancer > > > > > <russianneuromancer@ya.ru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Real names only please. > > > > > > > > What is the name of this reporter/tester? > > > > > > No one knows, I think. > > > > Then I don't think we can credit him/her for their efforts. > > SubmittingPatches clearly states "no pseudonyms or anonymous > > contributions". Either write to them and ask for their real name so > > that they can be credited, or remove the line. > > russianneuromancer has been a great help with reporting and testing > many Bay Trail / Cherry Trail issues. He does not want to use his > real name. > > AFAIK the Real Name rule only applies tot he Signed-off-by tag, no > other subsys-maintainers have had problems with listing him as > reporter / tester using his alias. > > The Real Name only rule is part of "11) Sign your work — the > Developer’s Certificate of Origin" of : > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html > #sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin > > Which is all about the S-o-b tag. If you despite this still want > a new version with russianneuromancer's Reported-and-tested-by > dropped let me know and I will send a new version. I saw some patches applied just with email in tags like Reported-by. So, I think everyone will be okay if you remove nick and leave email only. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web