Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1693516 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Gary Bisson <gary.bisson@boundarydevices.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-21 11:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-07-21 16:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
USB PHY reset for Nitrogen6x/MAX Gary Bisson <gary.bisson@boundarydevices.com> - 2017-07-21 11:30 +0200
Re: USB PHY reset for Nitrogen6x/MAX Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 16:10 +0200
| From | Gary Bisson <gary.bisson@boundarydevices.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-21 11:30 +0200 |
| Subject | USB PHY reset for Nitrogen6x/MAX |
| Message-ID | <u5CpY-31d-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Shawn, Fabio, Last October I offered the following two patches that add regulators to fix USB PHY reset on 2 of our boards: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9395531/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9395539/ At the time you preferred to wait for Peter's pwrseq sub-system to get in to have a proper reset sequence. Since then, it seems that it's still going to take a long time before Peter's series makes it to mainline and many customers of ours complained about USB. Would you consider adding back those two patches for next cycle. We can still modify them to use pwrseq in the future. Regards, Gary
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-21 16:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u5GMW-5Pz-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1693516 |
Hi Gary, On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Gary Bisson <gary.bisson@boundarydevices.com> wrote: > Hi Shawn, Fabio, > > Last October I offered the following two patches that add regulators > to fix USB PHY reset on 2 of our boards: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9395531/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9395539/ > > At the time you preferred to wait for Peter's pwrseq sub-system to get > in to have a proper reset sequence. > > Since then, it seems that it's still going to take a long time before > Peter's series makes it to mainline and many customers of ours > complained about USB. Yes, it seems that it may take some more time for Peter's pwrseq to be accepted. > Would you consider adding back those two patches for next cycle. We > can still modify them to use pwrseq in the future. What if you resend the patches stating that it is a temporary workaround until the generic pwrseq bindings are accepted?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web