Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1691908 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-19 17:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-07-22 15:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 058/102] phy: rockchip-pcie: explicitly request exclusive reset control Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> - 2017-07-19 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 058/102] phy: rockchip-pcie: explicitly request exclusive reset control Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> - 2017-07-22 15:10 +0200
| From | Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-19 17:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 058/102] phy: rockchip-pcie: explicitly request exclusive reset control |
| Message-ID | <u4ZoB-27S-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Commit a53e35db70d1 ("reset: Ensure drivers are explicit when requesting
reset lines") started to transition the reset control request API calls
to explicitly state whether the driver needs exclusive or shared reset
control behavior. Convert all drivers requesting exclusive resets to the
explicit API call so the temporary transition helpers can be removed.
No functional changes.
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
index 6904633cad687..258220b7f481c 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
rk_phy->phy_data = (struct rockchip_pcie_data *)of_id->data;
rk_phy->reg_base = grf;
- rk_phy->phy_rst = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "phy");
+ rk_phy->phy_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "phy");
if (IS_ERR(rk_phy->phy_rst)) {
if (PTR_ERR(rk_phy->phy_rst) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
dev_err(dev,
--
2.11.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-22 15:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 058/102] phy: rockchip-pcie: explicitly request exclusive reset control |
| Message-ID | <u62kp-2mn-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1691908 |
Hi Philipp
On 2017/7/19 23:26, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Commit a53e35db70d1 ("reset: Ensure drivers are explicit when requesting
> reset lines") started to transition the reset control request API calls
> to explicitly state whether the driver needs exclusive or shared reset
> control behavior. Convert all drivers requesting exclusive resets to the
> explicit API call so the temporary transition helpers can be removed.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 2 +-
This driver is under reconstruction and would probably go via
pci tree later. So I would mention your change to the reconstruction
work if that's applied.
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> index 6904633cad687..258220b7f481c 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> rk_phy->phy_data = (struct rockchip_pcie_data *)of_id->data;
> rk_phy->reg_base = grf;
>
> - rk_phy->phy_rst = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "phy");
> + rk_phy->phy_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "phy");
> if (IS_ERR(rk_phy->phy_rst)) {
> if (PTR_ERR(rk_phy->phy_rst) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> dev_err(dev,
>
--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web