Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1691684 > unrolled thread

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/11] Create fast idle path for short idle periods

Started byFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
First post2017-07-19 15:50 +0200
Last post2017-07-19 17:00 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/11] Create fast idle path for short idle periods Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 15:50 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/11] Create fast idle path for short idle periods "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-19 17:00 +0200

#1691684 — Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/11] Create fast idle path for short idle periods

FromFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date2017-07-19 15:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v1 00/11] Create fast idle path for short idle periods
Message-ID<u4Xwt-P7-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 08:56:51AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 01:54:51PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:09:31AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 06:34:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > > > But I think we can at the very least do this; it only gets called from
> > > > kernel/sched/idle.c and both callsites have IRQs explicitly disabled by
> > > > that point.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > > index 51d4c3acf32d..dccf2dc8155a 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > > @@ -843,13 +843,8 @@ static void rcu_eqs_enter(bool user)
> > > >   */
> > > >  void rcu_idle_enter(void)
> > > >  {
> > > > -	unsigned long flags;
> > > > -
> > > > -	local_irq_save(flags);
> > > 
> > > With this addition, I am all for it:
> > > 
> > > RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!irqs_disabled(), "rcu_idle_enter() invoked with irqs enabled!!!");
> > > 
> > > If you are OK with this addition, may I please have your Signed-off-by?
> > 
> > Sure,
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> 
> Very good, I have queued the patch below.  I left out the removal of
> the export as I need to work out why the export was there.  If it turns
> out not to be needed, I will remove the related ones as well.
> 
> Fair enough?
> 
> 							Thanx, Paul
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> commit 95f3e587ce6388028a51f0c852800fca944e7032
> Author: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Date:   Wed Jul 12 07:59:54 2017 -0700
> 
>     rcu: Make rcu_idle_enter() rely on callers disabling irqs
>     
>     All callers to rcu_idle_enter() have irqs disabled, so there is no
>     point in rcu_idle_enter disabling them again.  This commit therefore
>     replaces the irq disabling with a RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN().
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
>     Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 6de6b1c5ee53..c78b076653ce 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -840,11 +840,8 @@ static void rcu_eqs_enter(bool user)
>   */
>  void rcu_idle_enter(void)
>  {
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -
> -	local_irq_save(flags);
> +	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!irqs_disabled(), "rcu_idle_enter() invoked with irqs enabled!!!");

Nice! I really need to make that LOCKDEP_ASSERT_IRQS_DISABLED() patchset because there
are many places where either we have WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled()) or we need it but we were too
shy to do it for performance reason.

>  	rcu_eqs_enter(false);
> -	local_irq_restore(flags);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_idle_enter);
>  
> 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1691817

From"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date2017-07-19 17:00 +0200
Message-ID<u4YCe-1x4-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1691684
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 03:43:07PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 08:56:51AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 01:54:51PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:09:31AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 06:34:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > But I think we can at the very least do this; it only gets called from
> > > > > kernel/sched/idle.c and both callsites have IRQs explicitly disabled by
> > > > > that point.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > > > index 51d4c3acf32d..dccf2dc8155a 100644
> > > > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > > > @@ -843,13 +843,8 @@ static void rcu_eqs_enter(bool user)
> > > > >   */
> > > > >  void rcu_idle_enter(void)
> > > > >  {
> > > > > -	unsigned long flags;
> > > > > -
> > > > > -	local_irq_save(flags);
> > > > 
> > > > With this addition, I am all for it:
> > > > 
> > > > RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!irqs_disabled(), "rcu_idle_enter() invoked with irqs enabled!!!");
> > > > 
> > > > If you are OK with this addition, may I please have your Signed-off-by?
> > > 
> > > Sure,
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> > 
> > Very good, I have queued the patch below.  I left out the removal of
> > the export as I need to work out why the export was there.  If it turns
> > out not to be needed, I will remove the related ones as well.
> > 
> > Fair enough?
> > 
> > 							Thanx, Paul
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > commit 95f3e587ce6388028a51f0c852800fca944e7032
> > Author: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Date:   Wed Jul 12 07:59:54 2017 -0700
> > 
> >     rcu: Make rcu_idle_enter() rely on callers disabling irqs
> >     
> >     All callers to rcu_idle_enter() have irqs disabled, so there is no
> >     point in rcu_idle_enter disabling them again.  This commit therefore
> >     replaces the irq disabling with a RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN().
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> >     Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index 6de6b1c5ee53..c78b076653ce 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -840,11 +840,8 @@ static void rcu_eqs_enter(bool user)
> >   */
> >  void rcu_idle_enter(void)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned long flags;
> > -
> > -	local_irq_save(flags);
> > +	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!irqs_disabled(), "rcu_idle_enter() invoked with irqs enabled!!!");
> 
> Nice! I really need to make that LOCKDEP_ASSERT_IRQS_DISABLED() patchset because there
> are many places where either we have WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled()) or we need it but we were too
> shy to do it for performance reason.

If you create it, let me know, I could switch to it.

							Thanx, Paul

> >  	rcu_eqs_enter(false);
> > -	local_irq_restore(flags);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_idle_enter);
> >  
> > 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web