Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1690220 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-18 14:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-07-19 16:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] audit: fix memleak in auditd_send_unicast_skb. Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2017-07-18 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] audit: fix memleak in auditd_send_unicast_skb. Shu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com> - 2017-07-19 02:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] audit: fix memleak in auditd_send_unicast_skb. Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2017-07-19 16:50 +0200
| From | Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 14:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] audit: fix memleak in auditd_send_unicast_skb. |
| Message-ID | <u4zNv-2nc-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 2:37 AM, <shuwang@redhat.com> wrote:
> From: Shu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com>
>
> Found this issue by kmemleak report, auditd_send_unicast_skb
> did not free skb if rcu_dereference(auditd_conn) returns null.
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff88082568ce00 (size 256):
> comm "auditd", pid 1119, jiffies 4294708499
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffff8176166a>] kmemleak_alloc+0x4a/0xa0
> [<ffffffff8121820c>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0xcc/0x210
> [<ffffffff8161b99d>] __alloc_skb+0x5d/0x290
> [<ffffffff8113c614>] audit_make_reply+0x54/0xd0
> [<ffffffff8113dfa7>] audit_receive_msg+0x967/0xd70
> ----------------
> (gdb) list *audit_receive_msg+0x967
> 0xffffffff8113dff7 is in audit_receive_msg (kernel/audit.c:1133).
> 1132 skb = audit_make_reply(0, AUDIT_REPLACE, 0,
> 0, &pvnr, sizeof(pvnr));
> ---------------
> [<ffffffff8113e402>] audit_receive+0x52/0xa0
> [<ffffffff8166c561>] netlink_unicast+0x181/0x240
> [<ffffffff8166c8e2>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2c2/0x3b0
> [<ffffffff816112e8>] sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x50
> [<ffffffff816117a2>] SYSC_sendto+0x102/0x190
> [<ffffffff81612f4e>] SyS_sendto+0xe/0x10
> [<ffffffff8176d337>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1a/0xa5
> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>
> Signed-off-by: Shu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/audit.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Hello and thank you for the problem report, it is appreciated. This
was also reported by Masami Ichikawa who provided a patch with the
correct fix (your patch does not catch any error conditions from
netlink_unicast()).
* https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2017-July/msg00073.html
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index 833267b..6dd5569 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -641,6 +641,7 @@ static int auditd_send_unicast_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
> ac = rcu_dereference(auditd_conn);
> if (!ac) {
> rcu_read_unlock();
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> rc = -ECONNREFUSED;
> goto err;
> }
> --
> 2.5.0
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-19 02:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u4KSC-SO-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1690220 |
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>
> To: shuwang@redhat.com
> Cc: "Eric Paris" <eparis@redhat.com>, linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, liwang@redhat.com,
> chuhu@redhat.com
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 8:21:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: fix memleak in auditd_send_unicast_skb.
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 2:37 AM, <shuwang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > From: Shu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com>
> >
> > Found this issue by kmemleak report, auditd_send_unicast_skb
> > did not free skb if rcu_dereference(auditd_conn) returns null.
> >
> > unreferenced object 0xffff88082568ce00 (size 256):
> > comm "auditd", pid 1119, jiffies 4294708499
> > backtrace:
> > [<ffffffff8176166a>] kmemleak_alloc+0x4a/0xa0
> > [<ffffffff8121820c>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0xcc/0x210
> > [<ffffffff8161b99d>] __alloc_skb+0x5d/0x290
> > [<ffffffff8113c614>] audit_make_reply+0x54/0xd0
> > [<ffffffff8113dfa7>] audit_receive_msg+0x967/0xd70
> > ----------------
> > (gdb) list *audit_receive_msg+0x967
> > 0xffffffff8113dff7 is in audit_receive_msg (kernel/audit.c:1133).
> > 1132 skb = audit_make_reply(0, AUDIT_REPLACE, 0,
> > 0, &pvnr, sizeof(pvnr));
> > ---------------
> > [<ffffffff8113e402>] audit_receive+0x52/0xa0
> > [<ffffffff8166c561>] netlink_unicast+0x181/0x240
> > [<ffffffff8166c8e2>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2c2/0x3b0
> > [<ffffffff816112e8>] sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x50
> > [<ffffffff816117a2>] SYSC_sendto+0x102/0x190
> > [<ffffffff81612f4e>] SyS_sendto+0xe/0x10
> > [<ffffffff8176d337>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1a/0xa5
> > [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/audit.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> Hello and thank you for the problem report, it is appreciated. This
> was also reported by Masami Ichikawa who provided a patch with the
> correct fix (your patch does not catch any error conditions from
> netlink_unicast()).
netlink_unicast has it's error handling, and is responsible for
releasing skb. so the Masami Ichikawa's fix may cause double
free problems.
1274 int netlink_unicast(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb,
1275 >--->--- u32 portid, int nonblock)
1276 {
......
1285 >---sk = netlink_getsockbyportid(ssk, portid);
1286 >---if (IS_ERR(sk)) {
1287 >--->---kfree_skb(skb);
1288 >--->---return PTR_ERR(sk);
1289 >---}
......
1293 >---if (sk_filter(sk, skb)) {
1294 >--->---err = skb->len;
1295 >--->---kfree_skb(skb);
1296 >--->---sock_put(sk);
1297 >--->---return err;
1298 >---}
>
> * https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2017-July/msg00073.html
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> > index 833267b..6dd5569 100644
> > --- a/kernel/audit.c
> > +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> > @@ -641,6 +641,7 @@ static int auditd_send_unicast_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > ac = rcu_dereference(auditd_conn);
> > if (!ac) {
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > + kfree_skb(skb);
> > rc = -ECONNREFUSED;
> > goto err;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.5.0
>
> --
> paul moore
> www.paul-moore.com
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-19 16:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u4Ysy-1t8-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1690848 |
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Shu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com> >> To: shuwang@redhat.com >> Cc: "Eric Paris" <eparis@redhat.com>, linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, liwang@redhat.com, >> chuhu@redhat.com >> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 8:21:05 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: fix memleak in auditd_send_unicast_skb. >> >> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 2:37 AM, <shuwang@redhat.com> wrote: >> > From: Shu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com> >> > >> > Found this issue by kmemleak report, auditd_send_unicast_skb >> > did not free skb if rcu_dereference(auditd_conn) returns null. >> > >> > unreferenced object 0xffff88082568ce00 (size 256): >> > comm "auditd", pid 1119, jiffies 4294708499 >> > backtrace: >> > [<ffffffff8176166a>] kmemleak_alloc+0x4a/0xa0 >> > [<ffffffff8121820c>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0xcc/0x210 >> > [<ffffffff8161b99d>] __alloc_skb+0x5d/0x290 >> > [<ffffffff8113c614>] audit_make_reply+0x54/0xd0 >> > [<ffffffff8113dfa7>] audit_receive_msg+0x967/0xd70 >> > ---------------- >> > (gdb) list *audit_receive_msg+0x967 >> > 0xffffffff8113dff7 is in audit_receive_msg (kernel/audit.c:1133). >> > 1132 skb = audit_make_reply(0, AUDIT_REPLACE, 0, >> > 0, &pvnr, sizeof(pvnr)); >> > --------------- >> > [<ffffffff8113e402>] audit_receive+0x52/0xa0 >> > [<ffffffff8166c561>] netlink_unicast+0x181/0x240 >> > [<ffffffff8166c8e2>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2c2/0x3b0 >> > [<ffffffff816112e8>] sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x50 >> > [<ffffffff816117a2>] SYSC_sendto+0x102/0x190 >> > [<ffffffff81612f4e>] SyS_sendto+0xe/0x10 >> > [<ffffffff8176d337>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1a/0xa5 >> > [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Shu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com> >> > --- >> > kernel/audit.c | 1 + >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> Hello and thank you for the problem report, it is appreciated. This >> was also reported by Masami Ichikawa who provided a patch with the >> correct fix (your patch does not catch any error conditions from >> netlink_unicast()). > > netlink_unicast has it's error handling, and is responsible for > releasing skb. so the Masami Ichikawa's fix may cause double > free problems. Yes, my apologies, you are correct. I've backed out the other patch and applied your fix to audit/stable-4.13. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web