Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1690572 > unrolled thread

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/11] Create fast idle path for short idle periods

Started byPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
First post2017-07-18 21:00 +0200
Last post2017-07-18 21:00 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/11] Create fast idle path for short idle periods Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-18 21:00 +0200

#1690572 — Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/11] Create fast idle path for short idle periods

FromPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date2017-07-18 21:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v1 00/11] Create fast idle path for short idle periods
Message-ID<u4FSW-61V-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:48:38PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 7/17/2017 12:23 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Of course, this all assumes a Gaussian distribution to begin with, if we
> > get bimodal (or worse) distributions we can still get it wrong. To fix
> > that, we'd need to do something better than what we currently have.
> > 
> 
> fwiw some time ago I made a chart for predicted vs actual so you can sort
> of judge the distribution of things visually
> 
> http://git.fenrus.org/tmp/linux2.png

That shows we get it wrong a lot of times (about 50%, as per the
average) and moving the line has benefit. Since for performance you
really don't want to pick the deeper idle state, so you want to bias
your pick towards a shallower state.

Using the CDF approach you can quantify by how much you want it moved.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web