Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1690572 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-18 21:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-07-18 21:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/11] Create fast idle path for short idle periods Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-18 21:00 +0200
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 21:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/11] Create fast idle path for short idle periods |
| Message-ID | <u4FSW-61V-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:48:38PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 7/17/2017 12:23 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Of course, this all assumes a Gaussian distribution to begin with, if we > > get bimodal (or worse) distributions we can still get it wrong. To fix > > that, we'd need to do something better than what we currently have. > > > > fwiw some time ago I made a chart for predicted vs actual so you can sort > of judge the distribution of things visually > > http://git.fenrus.org/tmp/linux2.png That shows we get it wrong a lot of times (about 50%, as per the average) and moving the line has benefit. Since for performance you really don't want to pick the deeper idle state, so you want to bias your pick towards a shallower state. Using the CDF approach you can quantify by how much you want it moved.
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web