Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1686412 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: move include files out of include/linux/i2c

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: move include files out of include/linux/i2c Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2017-07-13 11:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: move include files out of include/linux/i2c Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2017-07-14 10:00 +0200

#1686412 — Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: move include files out of include/linux/i2c

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi peda,

On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 10:37:41PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> It doesn't make sense to use include/linux/i2c for client drivers which may in
> fact rather be hwmon or input or whatever devices. As a result, I want to
> deprecate include/linux/i2c for good. This series moves the include files to a
> better location, largely include/platform_data because that is what most of the
> moved include files contain. Note that some files don't seem to have upstream
> users in board code, so they maybe could even be removed? I didn't check for
> that now, but I did it for one i2c master driver recently. So, it may be
> possible.
> 
> And while i2c muxes might be a corner case, I still want to deprecate
> include/linux/i2c for good ;)
> 
> No runtime testing because of no HW, but buildbot is happy with this series at
> least. A branch can be found here:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/platform_data

Since there were no other i2c-mux patches this merge window and thus no
pull request, do you mind if I pick these two patches for my second pull
request this merge window to have them included in 4.13 already?

Regards,

   Wolfram

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1687132

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi peda,

> I don't seem to have this series in my inbox and not in my i2c folder either?

You have been CCed on the patches, but not on the cover-letter. Sorry
about that.

> patchwork and then I found it in the branch too, but in patchwork it has the
> expected "i2c: mux: " prefix so I'm not sure what you are talking about
> *exactly*.

Hmm, looks like I forgot to push out the updated branch. Sorry again.
But it is the same patch which originally got an imperfect prefix from
my automated script.

> But I'm sure you'll do something sensible, just go ahead.

I hope so :) Thanks!

> PS. Please Cc me if you want a faster reaction, I didn't notice this
> yesterday.

Yup, same issue as above. I was wrong in that I assumed you have been on
CC for the cover-letter as well. I should have checked again.

Thanks,

   Wolfram

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web