Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1681838 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-05 23:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-07-13 09:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[RFC v5 02/38] powerpc: Free up four 64K PTE bits in 64K backed HPTE pages Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> - 2017-07-05 23:30 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 02/38] powerpc: Free up four 64K PTE bits in 64K backed HPTE pages Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 08:10 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 02/38] powerpc: Free up four 64K PTE bits in 64K backed HPTE pages Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> - 2017-07-11 17:50 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 02/38] powerpc: Free up four 64K PTE bits in 64K backed HPTE pages Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 05:20 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 02/38] powerpc: Free up four 64K PTE bits in 64K backed HPTE pages Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> - 2017-07-13 09:50 +0200
| From | Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-05 23:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [RFC v5 02/38] powerpc: Free up four 64K PTE bits in 64K backed HPTE pages |
| Message-ID | <u0020-3kP-57@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Rearrange 64K PTE bits to free up bits 3, 4, 5 and 6
in the 64K backed HPTE pages. This along with the earlier
patch will entirely free up the four bits from 64K PTE.
The bit numbers are big-endian as defined in the ISA3.0
This patch does the following change to 64K PTE backed
by 64K HPTE.
H_PAGE_F_SECOND (S) which occupied bit 4 moves to the
second part of the pte to bit 60.
H_PAGE_F_GIX (G,I,X) which occupied bit 5, 6 and 7 also
moves to the second part of the pte to bit 61,
62, 63, 64 respectively
since bit 7 is now freed up, we move H_PAGE_BUSY (B) from
bit 9 to bit 7.
The second part of the PTE will hold
(H_PAGE_F_SECOND|H_PAGE_F_GIX) at bit 60,61,62,63.
Before the patch, the 64K HPTE backed 64k PTE format was
as follows
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10...........................63
: : : : : : : : : : : :
v v v v v v v v v v v v
,-,-,-,-,--,--,--,--,-,-,-,-,-,------------------,-,-,-,
|x|x|x| |S |G |I |X |x|B|x|x|x|................|.|.|.|.| <- primary pte
'_'_'_'_'__'__'__'__'_'_'_'_'_'________________'_'_'_'_'
| | | | | | | | | | | | |..................| | | | | <- secondary pte
'_'_'_'_'__'__'__'__'_'_'_'_'__________________'_'_'_'_'
After the patch, the 64k HPTE backed 64k PTE format is
as follows
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10...........................63
: : : : : : : : : : : :
v v v v v v v v v v v v
,-,-,-,-,--,--,--,--,-,-,-,-,-,------------------,-,-,-,
|x|x|x| | | | |B |x|x|x|x|x|................|.|.|.|.| <- primary pte
'_'_'_'_'__'__'__'__'_'_'_'_'_'________________'_'_'_'_'
| | | | | | | | | | | | |..................|S|G|I|X| <- secondary pte
'_'_'_'_'__'__'__'__'_'_'_'_'__________________'_'_'_'_'
The above PTE changes is applicable to hugetlbpages aswell.
The patch does the following code changes:
a) moves the H_PAGE_F_SECOND and H_PAGE_F_GIX to 4k PTE
header since it is no more needed b the 64k PTEs.
b) abstracts out __real_pte() and __rpte_to_hidx() so the
caller need not know the bit location of the slot.
c) moves the slot bits the secondary pte.
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-4k.h | 3 ++
arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-64k.h | 29 ++++++++++-------------
arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash.h | 3 --
arch/powerpc/mm/hash64_64k.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------
arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage-hash64.c | 22 ++++++++++++++----
5 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-4k.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-4k.h
index a306c0a..1e60099 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-4k.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-4k.h
@@ -16,6 +16,9 @@
#define H_PUD_TABLE_SIZE (sizeof(pud_t) << H_PUD_INDEX_SIZE)
#define H_PGD_TABLE_SIZE (sizeof(pgd_t) << H_PGD_INDEX_SIZE)
+#define H_PAGE_F_GIX_SHIFT 56
+#define H_PAGE_F_SECOND _RPAGE_RSV2 /* HPTE is in 2ndary HPTEG */
+#define H_PAGE_F_GIX (_RPAGE_RSV3 | _RPAGE_RSV4 | _RPAGE_RPN44)
#define H_PAGE_BUSY _RPAGE_RSV1 /* software: PTE & hash are busy */
/* PTE flags to conserve for HPTE identification */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-64k.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-64k.h
index 62e580c..c281f18 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-64k.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-64k.h
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
*/
#define H_PAGE_COMBO _RPAGE_RPN0 /* this is a combo 4k page */
#define H_PAGE_4K_PFN _RPAGE_RPN1 /* PFN is for a single 4k page */
-#define H_PAGE_BUSY _RPAGE_RPN42 /* software: PTE & hash are busy */
+#define H_PAGE_BUSY _RPAGE_RPN44 /* software: PTE & hash are busy */
/*
* We need to differentiate between explicit huge page and THP huge
@@ -21,8 +21,7 @@
#define H_PAGE_THP_HUGE H_PAGE_4K_PFN
/* PTE flags to conserve for HPTE identification */
-#define _PAGE_HPTEFLAGS (H_PAGE_BUSY | H_PAGE_F_SECOND | \
- H_PAGE_F_GIX | H_PAGE_HASHPTE | H_PAGE_COMBO)
+#define _PAGE_HPTEFLAGS (H_PAGE_BUSY | H_PAGE_HASHPTE | H_PAGE_COMBO)
/*
* we support 16 fragments per PTE page of 64K size.
*/
@@ -50,24 +49,22 @@ static inline real_pte_t __real_pte(pte_t pte, pte_t *ptep)
unsigned long *hidxp;
rpte.pte = pte;
- rpte.hidx = 0;
- if (pte_val(pte) & H_PAGE_COMBO) {
- /*
- * Make sure we order the hidx load against the H_PAGE_COMBO
- * check. The store side ordering is done in __hash_page_4K
- */
- smp_rmb();
- hidxp = (unsigned long *)(ptep + PTRS_PER_PTE);
- rpte.hidx = *hidxp;
- }
+ /*
+ * Ensure that we do not read the hidx before we read
+ * the pte. Because the writer side is expected
+ * to finish writing the hidx first followed by the pte,
+ * by using smp_wmb().
+ * pte_set_hash_slot() ensures that.
+ */
+ smp_rmb();
+ hidxp = (unsigned long *)(ptep + PTRS_PER_PTE);
+ rpte.hidx = *hidxp;
return rpte;
}
static inline unsigned long __rpte_to_hidx(real_pte_t rpte, unsigned long index)
{
- if ((pte_val(rpte.pte) & H_PAGE_COMBO))
- return (rpte.hidx >> (index<<2)) & 0xf;
- return (pte_val(rpte.pte) >> H_PAGE_F_GIX_SHIFT) & 0xf;
+ return ((rpte.hidx >> (index<<2)) & 0xfUL);
}
#define __rpte_to_pte(r) ((r).pte)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash.h
index 2d72964..d27f885 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash.h
@@ -8,9 +8,6 @@
*
*/
#define H_PTE_NONE_MASK _PAGE_HPTEFLAGS
-#define H_PAGE_F_GIX_SHIFT 56
-#define H_PAGE_F_SECOND _RPAGE_RSV2 /* HPTE is in 2ndary HPTEG */
-#define H_PAGE_F_GIX (_RPAGE_RSV3 | _RPAGE_RSV4 | _RPAGE_RPN44)
#define H_PAGE_HASHPTE _RPAGE_RPN43 /* PTE has associated HPTE */
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash64_64k.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash64_64k.c
index e573bd3..0012618 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash64_64k.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash64_64k.c
@@ -243,6 +243,8 @@ int __hash_page_64K(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access,
unsigned long vsid, pte_t *ptep, unsigned long trap,
unsigned long flags, int ssize)
{
+ real_pte_t rpte;
+ unsigned long *hidxp;
unsigned long hpte_group;
unsigned long rflags, pa;
unsigned long old_pte, new_pte;
@@ -279,6 +281,7 @@ int __hash_page_64K(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access,
} while (!pte_xchg(ptep, __pte(old_pte), __pte(new_pte)));
rflags = htab_convert_pte_flags(new_pte);
+ rpte = __real_pte(__pte(old_pte), ptep);
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_NOEXECUTE) &&
!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_COHERENT_ICACHE))
@@ -286,15 +289,17 @@ int __hash_page_64K(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access,
vpn = hpt_vpn(ea, vsid, ssize);
if (unlikely(old_pte & H_PAGE_HASHPTE)) {
- /*
- * There MIGHT be an HPTE for this pte
- */
+ unsigned long hash, slot, hidx;
+
hash = hpt_hash(vpn, shift, ssize);
- if (old_pte & H_PAGE_F_SECOND)
+ hidx = __rpte_to_hidx(rpte, 0);
+ if (hidx & _PTEIDX_SECONDARY)
hash = ~hash;
slot = (hash & htab_hash_mask) * HPTES_PER_GROUP;
- slot += (old_pte & H_PAGE_F_GIX) >> H_PAGE_F_GIX_SHIFT;
-
+ slot += hidx & _PTEIDX_GROUP_IX;
+ /*
+ * There MIGHT be an HPTE for this pte
+ */
if (mmu_hash_ops.hpte_updatepp(slot, rflags, vpn, MMU_PAGE_64K,
MMU_PAGE_64K, ssize,
flags) == -1)
@@ -344,9 +349,18 @@ int __hash_page_64K(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access,
MMU_PAGE_64K, MMU_PAGE_64K, old_pte);
return -1;
}
+
+ /*
+ * Insert slot number & secondary bit in PTE second half.
+ */
+ hidxp = (unsigned long *)(ptep + PTRS_PER_PTE);
+ rpte.hidx &= ~(0xfUL);
+ *hidxp = rpte.hidx | (slot & 0xfUL);
+ /*
+ * check __real_pte for details on matching smp_rmb()
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
new_pte = (new_pte & ~_PAGE_HPTEFLAGS) | H_PAGE_HASHPTE;
- new_pte |= (slot << H_PAGE_F_GIX_SHIFT) &
- (H_PAGE_F_SECOND | H_PAGE_F_GIX);
}
*ptep = __pte(new_pte & ~H_PAGE_BUSY);
return 0;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage-hash64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage-hash64.c
index a84bb44..6f7aee3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage-hash64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage-hash64.c
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ int __hash_page_huge(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access, unsigned long vsid,
pte_t *ptep, unsigned long trap, unsigned long flags,
int ssize, unsigned int shift, unsigned int mmu_psize)
{
+ real_pte_t rpte;
+ unsigned long *hidxp;
unsigned long vpn;
unsigned long old_pte, new_pte;
unsigned long rflags, pa, sz;
@@ -61,6 +63,7 @@ int __hash_page_huge(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access, unsigned long vsid,
} while(!pte_xchg(ptep, __pte(old_pte), __pte(new_pte)));
rflags = htab_convert_pte_flags(new_pte);
+ rpte = __real_pte(__pte(old_pte), ptep);
sz = ((1UL) << shift);
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_COHERENT_ICACHE))
@@ -71,13 +74,14 @@ int __hash_page_huge(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access, unsigned long vsid,
/* Check if pte already has an hpte (case 2) */
if (unlikely(old_pte & H_PAGE_HASHPTE)) {
/* There MIGHT be an HPTE for this pte */
- unsigned long hash, slot;
+ unsigned long hash, slot, hidx;
hash = hpt_hash(vpn, shift, ssize);
- if (old_pte & H_PAGE_F_SECOND)
+ hidx = __rpte_to_hidx(rpte, 0);
+ if (hidx & _PTEIDX_SECONDARY)
hash = ~hash;
slot = (hash & htab_hash_mask) * HPTES_PER_GROUP;
- slot += (old_pte & H_PAGE_F_GIX) >> H_PAGE_F_GIX_SHIFT;
+ slot += hidx & _PTEIDX_GROUP_IX;
if (mmu_hash_ops.hpte_updatepp(slot, rflags, vpn, mmu_psize,
mmu_psize, ssize, flags) == -1)
@@ -106,8 +110,16 @@ int __hash_page_huge(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access, unsigned long vsid,
return -1;
}
- new_pte |= (slot << H_PAGE_F_GIX_SHIFT) &
- (H_PAGE_F_SECOND | H_PAGE_F_GIX);
+ /*
+ * Insert slot number & secondary bit in PTE second half.
+ */
+ hidxp = (unsigned long *)(ptep + PTRS_PER_PTE);
+ rpte.hidx &= ~(0xfUL);
+ *hidxp = rpte.hidx | (slot & 0xfUL);
+ /*
+ * check __real_pte for details on matching smp_rmb()
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
}
/*
--
1.7.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-11 08:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC v5 02/38] powerpc: Free up four 64K PTE bits in 64K backed HPTE pages |
| Message-ID | <u1WwW-74G-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1681838 |
On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:21:39 -0700 Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Rearrange 64K PTE bits to free up bits 3, 4, 5 and 6 > in the 64K backed HPTE pages. This along with the earlier > patch will entirely free up the four bits from 64K PTE. > The bit numbers are big-endian as defined in the ISA3.0 > > This patch does the following change to 64K PTE backed > by 64K HPTE. > > H_PAGE_F_SECOND (S) which occupied bit 4 moves to the > second part of the pte to bit 60. > H_PAGE_F_GIX (G,I,X) which occupied bit 5, 6 and 7 also > moves to the second part of the pte to bit 61, > 62, 63, 64 respectively > > since bit 7 is now freed up, we move H_PAGE_BUSY (B) from > bit 9 to bit 7. > > The second part of the PTE will hold > (H_PAGE_F_SECOND|H_PAGE_F_GIX) at bit 60,61,62,63. > > Before the patch, the 64K HPTE backed 64k PTE format was > as follows > > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10...........................63 > : : : : : : : : : : : : > v v v v v v v v v v v v > > ,-,-,-,-,--,--,--,--,-,-,-,-,-,------------------,-,-,-, > |x|x|x| |S |G |I |X |x|B|x|x|x|................|.|.|.|.| <- primary pte > '_'_'_'_'__'__'__'__'_'_'_'_'_'________________'_'_'_'_' > | | | | | | | | | | | | |..................| | | | | <- secondary pte > '_'_'_'_'__'__'__'__'_'_'_'_'__________________'_'_'_'_' > It's not entirely clear what the secondary pte contains today and how many of the bits are free today? Balbir Singh.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-11 17:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC v5 02/38] powerpc: Free up four 64K PTE bits in 64K backed HPTE pages |
| Message-ID | <u25Ae-48y-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1684791 |
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 03:59:59PM +1000, Balbir Singh wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:21:39 -0700 > Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > Rearrange 64K PTE bits to free up bits 3, 4, 5 and 6 > > in the 64K backed HPTE pages. This along with the earlier > > patch will entirely free up the four bits from 64K PTE. > > The bit numbers are big-endian as defined in the ISA3.0 > > > > This patch does the following change to 64K PTE backed > > by 64K HPTE. > > > > H_PAGE_F_SECOND (S) which occupied bit 4 moves to the > > second part of the pte to bit 60. > > H_PAGE_F_GIX (G,I,X) which occupied bit 5, 6 and 7 also > > moves to the second part of the pte to bit 61, > > 62, 63, 64 respectively > > > > since bit 7 is now freed up, we move H_PAGE_BUSY (B) from > > bit 9 to bit 7. > > > > The second part of the PTE will hold > > (H_PAGE_F_SECOND|H_PAGE_F_GIX) at bit 60,61,62,63. > > > > Before the patch, the 64K HPTE backed 64k PTE format was > > as follows > > > > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10...........................63 > > : : : : : : : : : : : : > > v v v v v v v v v v v v > > > > ,-,-,-,-,--,--,--,--,-,-,-,-,-,------------------,-,-,-, > > |x|x|x| |S |G |I |X |x|B|x|x|x|................|.|.|.|.| <- primary pte > > '_'_'_'_'__'__'__'__'_'_'_'_'_'________________'_'_'_'_' > > | | | | | | | | | | | | |..................| | | | | <- secondary pte > > '_'_'_'_'__'__'__'__'_'_'_'_'__________________'_'_'_'_' > > > > It's not entirely clear what the secondary pte contains > today and how many of the bits are free today? The secondary pte today is not used for anything for 64k-hpte backed ptes. It gets used the moment the pte gets backed by 4-k hptes. Till then the bits are available. And this patch makes use of that knowledge. Will add some words in the patch description towards this. Thanks, RP > > Balbir Singh. -- Ram Pai
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-12 05:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC v5 02/38] powerpc: Free up four 64K PTE bits in 64K backed HPTE pages |
| Message-ID | <u2glX-2Cm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1685162 |
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 08:44:15 -0700 Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 03:59:59PM +1000, Balbir Singh wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:21:39 -0700 > > Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > Rearrange 64K PTE bits to free up bits 3, 4, 5 and 6 > > > in the 64K backed HPTE pages. This along with the earlier > > > patch will entirely free up the four bits from 64K PTE. > > > The bit numbers are big-endian as defined in the ISA3.0 > > > > > > This patch does the following change to 64K PTE backed > > > by 64K HPTE. > > > > > > H_PAGE_F_SECOND (S) which occupied bit 4 moves to the > > > second part of the pte to bit 60. > > > H_PAGE_F_GIX (G,I,X) which occupied bit 5, 6 and 7 also > > > moves to the second part of the pte to bit 61, > > > 62, 63, 64 respectively > > > > > > since bit 7 is now freed up, we move H_PAGE_BUSY (B) from > > > bit 9 to bit 7. > > > > > > The second part of the PTE will hold > > > (H_PAGE_F_SECOND|H_PAGE_F_GIX) at bit 60,61,62,63. > > > > > > Before the patch, the 64K HPTE backed 64k PTE format was > > > as follows > > > > > > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10...........................63 > > > : : : : : : : : : : : : > > > v v v v v v v v v v v v > > > > > > ,-,-,-,-,--,--,--,--,-,-,-,-,-,------------------,-,-,-, > > > |x|x|x| |S |G |I |X |x|B|x|x|x|................|.|.|.|.| <- primary pte > > > '_'_'_'_'__'__'__'__'_'_'_'_'_'________________'_'_'_'_' > > > | | | | | | | | | | | | |..................| | | | | <- secondary pte > > > '_'_'_'_'__'__'__'__'_'_'_'_'__________________'_'_'_'_' > > > > > > > It's not entirely clear what the secondary pte contains > > today and how many of the bits are free today? > > The secondary pte today is not used for anything for 64k-hpte > backed ptes. It gets used the moment the pte gets backed by > 4-k hptes. Till then the bits are available. And this patch > makes use of that knowledge. OK.. but does this mean subpage-protection? Or do you mean page size demotion? I presume it's the later. Balbir Singh.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-13 09:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC v5 02/38] powerpc: Free up four 64K PTE bits in 64K backed HPTE pages |
| Message-ID | <u2H2O-2IC-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1685480 |
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 01:10:51PM +1000, Balbir Singh wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 08:44:15 -0700 > Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 03:59:59PM +1000, Balbir Singh wrote: > > > On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:21:39 -0700 > > > Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Rearrange 64K PTE bits to free up bits 3, 4, 5 and 6 > > > > in the 64K backed HPTE pages. This along with the earlier > > > > patch will entirely free up the four bits from 64K PTE. > > > > The bit numbers are big-endian as defined in the ISA3.0 > > > > > > > > This patch does the following change to 64K PTE backed > > > > by 64K HPTE. > > > > > > > > H_PAGE_F_SECOND (S) which occupied bit 4 moves to the > > > > second part of the pte to bit 60. > > > > H_PAGE_F_GIX (G,I,X) which occupied bit 5, 6 and 7 also > > > > moves to the second part of the pte to bit 61, > > > > 62, 63, 64 respectively > > > > > > > > since bit 7 is now freed up, we move H_PAGE_BUSY (B) from > > > > bit 9 to bit 7. > > > > > > > > The second part of the PTE will hold > > > > (H_PAGE_F_SECOND|H_PAGE_F_GIX) at bit 60,61,62,63. > > > > > > > > Before the patch, the 64K HPTE backed 64k PTE format was > > > > as follows > > > > > > > > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10...........................63 > > > > : : : : : : : : : : : : > > > > v v v v v v v v v v v v > > > > > > > > ,-,-,-,-,--,--,--,--,-,-,-,-,-,------------------,-,-,-, > > > > |x|x|x| |S |G |I |X |x|B|x|x|x|................|.|.|.|.| <- primary pte > > > > '_'_'_'_'__'__'__'__'_'_'_'_'_'________________'_'_'_'_' > > > > | | | | | | | | | | | | |..................| | | | | <- secondary pte > > > > '_'_'_'_'__'__'__'__'_'_'_'_'__________________'_'_'_'_' > > > > > > > > > > It's not entirely clear what the secondary pte contains > > > today and how many of the bits are free today? > > > > The secondary pte today is not used for anything for 64k-hpte > > backed ptes. It gets used the moment the pte gets backed by > > 4-k hptes. Till then the bits are available. And this patch > > makes use of that knowledge. > > OK.. but does this mean subpage-protection? Or do you mean > page size demotion? I presume it's the later. Yes. the later. RP
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web