Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1686338 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] rbd: Fix uninitialized variable use in rbd_acquire_lock

Started byKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
First post2017-07-13 10:00 +0200
Last post2017-07-17 17:10 +0200
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] rbd: Fix uninitialized variable use in rbd_acquire_lock Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> - 2017-07-13 10:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] rbd: Fix uninitialized variable use in rbd_acquire_lock Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 12:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] rbd: Fix uninitialized variable use in rbd_acquire_lock Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> - 2017-07-14 13:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] rbd: Fix uninitialized variable use in rbd_acquire_lock Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 17:10 +0200

#1686338 — [PATCH] rbd: Fix uninitialized variable use in rbd_acquire_lock

FromKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Date2017-07-13 10:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH] rbd: Fix uninitialized variable use in rbd_acquire_lock
Message-ID<u2Hcu-2Mh-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
drivers/block/rbd.c: In function 'rbd_acquire_lock':
drivers/block/rbd.c:3602:44: error: 'ret' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

Silence the warning, found it when built old kernel(3.10) with
OBS(opensuse build service).

Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/block/rbd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
index b008b6a..b640ad8 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -3435,7 +3435,7 @@ static void rbd_acquire_lock(struct work_struct *work)
 	struct rbd_device *rbd_dev = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
 					    struct rbd_device, lock_dwork);
 	enum rbd_lock_state lock_state;
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	dout("%s rbd_dev %p\n", __func__, rbd_dev);
 again:
-- 
1.7.12.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1687231

FromIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Date2017-07-14 12:10 +0200
Message-ID<u35HP-1Xa-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1686338
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> wrote:
> drivers/block/rbd.c: In function 'rbd_acquire_lock':
> drivers/block/rbd.c:3602:44: error: 'ret' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>
> Silence the warning, found it when built old kernel(3.10) with
> OBS(opensuse build service).
>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/block/rbd.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> index b008b6a..b640ad8 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> @@ -3435,7 +3435,7 @@ static void rbd_acquire_lock(struct work_struct *work)
>         struct rbd_device *rbd_dev = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
>                                             struct rbd_device, lock_dwork);
>         enum rbd_lock_state lock_state;
> -       int ret;
> +       int ret = 0;
>
>         dout("%s rbd_dev %p\n", __func__, rbd_dev);
>  again:

How did you get rbd_acquire_lock() into 3.10?

Thanks,

                Ilya

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1687268

FromKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Date2017-07-14 13:30 +0200
Message-ID<u36Xg-2Gt-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1687231

On 2017/7/14 18:06, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> wrote:
>> drivers/block/rbd.c: In function 'rbd_acquire_lock':
>> drivers/block/rbd.c:3602:44: error: 'ret' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>>
>> Silence the warning, found it when built old kernel(3.10) with
>> OBS(opensuse build service).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/block/rbd.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
>> index b008b6a..b640ad8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
>> @@ -3435,7 +3435,7 @@ static void rbd_acquire_lock(struct work_struct *work)
>>         struct rbd_device *rbd_dev = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
>>                                             struct rbd_device, lock_dwork);
>>         enum rbd_lock_state lock_state;
>> -       int ret;
>> +       int ret = 0;
>>
>>         dout("%s rbd_dev %p\n", __func__, rbd_dev);
>>  again:
> 
> How did you get rbd_acquire_lock() into 3.10?

Using CentOS 7.3.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
>                 Ilya
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1689157

FromIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Date2017-07-17 17:10 +0200
Message-ID<u4fON-6GU-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1687268
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2017/7/14 18:06, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> wrote:
>>> drivers/block/rbd.c: In function 'rbd_acquire_lock':
>>> drivers/block/rbd.c:3602:44: error: 'ret' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>>>
>>> Silence the warning, found it when built old kernel(3.10) with
>>> OBS(opensuse build service).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/block/rbd.c | 2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
>>> index b008b6a..b640ad8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
>>> @@ -3435,7 +3435,7 @@ static void rbd_acquire_lock(struct work_struct *work)
>>>         struct rbd_device *rbd_dev = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
>>>                                             struct rbd_device, lock_dwork);
>>>         enum rbd_lock_state lock_state;
>>> -       int ret;
>>> +       int ret = 0;
>>>
>>>         dout("%s rbd_dev %p\n", __func__, rbd_dev);
>>>  again:
>>
>> How did you get rbd_acquire_lock() into 3.10?
>
> Using CentOS 7.3.

Applied.

Thanks,

                Ilya

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web