Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1682407 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] arm64: arch_timer: fix the infinite recursion when enable ftrace and erratum workaround

Started byDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
First post2017-07-06 15:00 +0200
Last post2017-07-09 10:20 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] arm64: arch_timer: fix the infinite recursion when enable  ftrace and erratum workaround Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> - 2017-07-06 15:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] arm64: arch_timer: fix the infinite recursion when  enable ftrace and erratum workaround Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-07-06 16:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] arm64: arch_timer: fix the infinite recursion when enable  ftrace and erratum workaround Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> - 2017-07-09 10:20 +0200

#1682407 — [PATCH] arm64: arch_timer: fix the infinite recursion when enable ftrace and erratum workaround

FromDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Date2017-07-06 15:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH] arm64: arch_timer: fix the infinite recursion when enable ftrace and erratum workaround
Message-ID<u0exY-4pY-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
When enable preempt and ftrace, and perform the following steps, the system will hang:
mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug/
cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/
echo function_graph > current_tracer

This is because the preempt_disable and preempt_enable calls would cause infinite
recursion for some chips which needs the timer erratum workaround and the system
will hang, so use the preempt_disable/enable_notrace calls to prevent recursion.

Fixes: 6acc71ccac71 ("arm64: arch_timer: Allows a CPU-specific erratum to only affect a subset of CPUs")
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
index 74d08e4..67bb7a4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
@@ -65,13 +65,13 @@ struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround {
 	u64 _val;							\
 	if (needs_unstable_timer_counter_workaround()) {		\
 		const struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa;		\
-		preempt_disable();					\
+		preempt_disable_notrace();				\
 		wa = __this_cpu_read(timer_unstable_counter_workaround); \
 		if (wa && wa->read_##reg)				\
 			_val = wa->read_##reg();			\
 		else							\
 			_val = read_sysreg(reg);			\
-		preempt_enable();					\
+		preempt_enable_notrace();				\
 	} else {							\
 		_val = read_sysreg(reg);				\
 	}								\
-- 
1.9.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1682484 — Re: [PATCH] arm64: arch_timer: fix the infinite recursion when enable ftrace and erratum workaround

FromMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date2017-07-06 16:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] arm64: arch_timer: fix the infinite recursion when enable ftrace and erratum workaround
Message-ID<u0g6L-60R-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1682407
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 08:49:33PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> When enable preempt and ftrace, and perform the following steps, the system will hang:
> mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug/
> cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/
> echo function_graph > current_tracer
> 
> This is because the preempt_disable and preempt_enable calls would cause infinite
> recursion for some chips which needs the timer erratum workaround and the system
> will hang, so use the preempt_disable/enable_notrace calls to prevent recursion.

Nit: Please wrap commit messages at 72 characters, unless you have
something that wrapping would destroy.

That aside, this looks sane, but a better expanation would be
worthwhile. What exactly causes the recursion? Does ftrace instrument
preempt_{disable,enable} ?

Can you give an example of the recursion?

Thanks,
Mark.

> 
> Fixes: 6acc71ccac71 ("arm64: arch_timer: Allows a CPU-specific erratum to only affect a subset of CPUs")
> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> index 74d08e4..67bb7a4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> @@ -65,13 +65,13 @@ struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround {
>  	u64 _val;							\
>  	if (needs_unstable_timer_counter_workaround()) {		\
>  		const struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa;		\
> -		preempt_disable();					\
> +		preempt_disable_notrace();				\
>  		wa = __this_cpu_read(timer_unstable_counter_workaround); \
>  		if (wa && wa->read_##reg)				\
>  			_val = wa->read_##reg();			\
>  		else							\
>  			_val = read_sysreg(reg);			\
> -		preempt_enable();					\
> +		preempt_enable_notrace();				\
>  	} else {							\
>  		_val = read_sysreg(reg);				\
>  	}								\
> -- 
> 1.9.0
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1683704

FromDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Date2017-07-09 10:20 +0200
Message-ID<u1fBD-5h8-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1682484

On 2017/7/6 22:35, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 08:49:33PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> When enable preempt and ftrace, and perform the following steps, the system will hang:
>> mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug/
>> cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/
>> echo function_graph > current_tracer
>>
>> This is because the preempt_disable and preempt_enable calls would cause infinite
>> recursion for some chips which needs the timer erratum workaround and the system
>> will hang, so use the preempt_disable/enable_notrace calls to prevent recursion.
> 
> Nit: Please wrap commit messages at 72 characters, unless you have
> something that wrapping would destroy.
> 
OK

> That aside, this looks sane, but a better expanation would be
> worthwhile. What exactly causes the recursion? Does ftrace instrument
> preempt_{disable,enable} ?
> 
> Can you give an example of the recursion?
> 

As the 96b3d28bf4(sched/clock: Prevent tracing recursion in sched_clock_cpu()) said, the
preempt_disable/enable() are traced and this cause trace_clock() users to get the local timer
again, it will cause the infinite recursion.

> Thanks,
> Mark.
> 
>>
>> Fixes: 6acc71ccac71 ("arm64: arch_timer: Allows a CPU-specific erratum to only affect a subset of CPUs")
>> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
>> index 74d08e4..67bb7a4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
>> @@ -65,13 +65,13 @@ struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround {
>>  	u64 _val;							\
>>  	if (needs_unstable_timer_counter_workaround()) {		\
>>  		const struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa;		\
>> -		preempt_disable();					\
>> +		preempt_disable_notrace();				\
>>  		wa = __this_cpu_read(timer_unstable_counter_workaround); \
>>  		if (wa && wa->read_##reg)				\
>>  			_val = wa->read_##reg();			\
>>  		else							\
>>  			_val = read_sysreg(reg);			\
>> -		preempt_enable();					\
>> +		preempt_enable_notrace();				\
>>  	} else {							\
>>  		_val = read_sysreg(reg);				\
>>  	}								\
>> -- 
>> 1.9.0
>>
>>
> 
> .
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web