Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1684015 > unrolled thread

Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 00/16] eeprom: at24: Add OF device ID table

Started byJavier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>
First post2017-07-10 09:50 +0200
Last post2017-07-10 09:50 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 00/16] eeprom: at24: Add OF device ID table Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> - 2017-07-10 09:50 +0200

#1684015 — Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 00/16] eeprom: at24: Add OF device ID table

FromJavier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>
Date2017-07-10 09:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [RESEND PATCH v5 00/16] eeprom: at24: Add OF device ID table
Message-ID<u1BCb-28a-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hello Wolfram,

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier@dowhile0.org> wrote:
>
> This series is a follow-up to patch [0] that added an OF device ID table
> to the at24 EEPROM driver. As you suggested [1], this version instead of
> adding entries for every used <vendor,device> tuple, only adds a single
> entry for each chip type using the "atmel" vendor as a generic fallback.
>
> The first patch documents in the DT binding what's the correct vendor to
> use and what are the ones that are being deprecated. The second one adds
> the OF device ID table for the at24 driver and the next patches use this
> vendor in the compatible string to each DTS that defines a compatible I2C
> EEPROM device node.
>
> Patches can be applied independently since the DTS changes without driver
> changes are no-op and the OF table won't be used without the DTS changes.
>
> [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/14/589
> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/15/99
>

Are you planning to pick this series? It has been in the list for
months and were resent many times...

Best regards,
Javier

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web