Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1682889 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-07 05:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-07-07 10:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] sched/cputime: Fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 05:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/cputime: Fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-07 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/cputime: Fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 10:50 +0200
| From | Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-07 05:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] sched/cputime: Fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible |
| Message-ID | <u0rYe-6qk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: 99-trinity/181
caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x19
CPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm: 99-trinity Not tainted 4.12.0-01059-g2a42eb9 #1
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x82/0xb8
check_preemption_disabled+0xd1/0xe3
debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x19
vtime_delta+0xd/0x2c
task_cputime+0x89/0xdb
thread_group_cputime+0x11b/0x1ed
thread_group_cputime_adjusted+0x1f/0x47
wait_consider_task+0x2a9/0xaf9
? lock_acquire+0x97/0xa4
do_wait+0xdf/0x1f4
SYSC_wait4+0x8e/0xb5
? list_add+0x34/0x34
SyS_wait4+0x9/0xb
do_syscall_64+0x70/0x82
entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
As Frederic pointed out:
| Although those sched_clock_cpu() things seem to only matter when the
| sched_clock() is unstable. And that stability is a condition for nohz_full
| to work anyway. So probably sched_clock() alone would be enough.
This patch fixes it by replacing sched_clock_cpu() in vtime_delta() by
sched_clock() to avoid to call smp_processor_id() in preemptible context.
Reported-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
---
kernel/sched/cputime.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index 6e3ea4a..d86b94e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ static u64 vtime_delta(struct vtime *vtime)
{
unsigned long long clock;
- clock = sched_clock_cpu(smp_processor_id());
+ clock = sched_clock();
if (clock < vtime->starttime)
return 0;
--
2.7.4
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-07 10:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched/cputime: Fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible |
| Message-ID | <u0wEz-1dx-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1682889 |
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 08:18:41PM -0700, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> @@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ static u64 vtime_delta(struct vtime *vtime)
> {
> unsigned long long clock;
>
> - clock = sched_clock_cpu(smp_processor_id());
> + clock = sched_clock();
> if (clock < vtime->starttime)
> return 0;
>
This is broken. sched_clock_cpu() and sched_clock() do not have the
exact same value :-/
So this ends up doing:
vtime->starttime = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
/* ... */
clock = sched_clock();
delta = clock - vtime->starttime;
And you compute a delta using two different clocks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-07 10:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u0x7A-1qN-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1683014 |
2017-07-07 16:11 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 08:18:41PM -0700, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
>> @@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ static u64 vtime_delta(struct vtime *vtime)
>> {
>> unsigned long long clock;
>>
>> - clock = sched_clock_cpu(smp_processor_id());
>> + clock = sched_clock();
>> if (clock < vtime->starttime)
>> return 0;
>>
>
> This is broken. sched_clock_cpu() and sched_clock() do not have the
> exact same value :-/
>
> So this ends up doing:
>
> vtime->starttime = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
>
> /* ... */
>
> clock = sched_clock();
>
> delta = clock - vtime->starttime;
>
>
> And you compute a delta using two different clocks.
How about adding preempt_disable/enable() pair around vtime_delta() in
task_cputime()?
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web