Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1683369 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-07 21:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-07-07 21:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH v3 2/4] selftests/ftrace: Update multiple kprobes test for powerpc "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-07 21:00 +0200
| From | "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-07 21:00 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v3 2/4] selftests/ftrace: Update multiple kprobes test for powerpc |
| Message-ID | <u0GDU-7Z0-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
KPROBES_ON_FTRACE is only available on powerpc64le. Update comment to clarify this. Also, we should use an offset of 8 to ensure that the probe does not fall on ftrace location. The current offset of 4 will fall before the function local entry point and won't fire, while an offset of 12 or 16 will fall on ftrace location. Offset 8 is currently guaranteed to not be the ftrace location. Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc index f4d1ff785d67..2a1cb9908746 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc @@ -2,10 +2,10 @@ # description: Register/unregister many kprobe events # ftrace fentry skip size depends on the machine architecture. -# Currently HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE defined on x86 and powerpc +# Currently HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE defined on x86 and powerpc64le case `uname -m` in x86_64|i[3456]86) OFFS=5;; - ppc*) OFFS=4;; + ppc64le) OFFS=8;; *) OFFS=0;; esac -- 2.13.2
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web