Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1629296 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] powerpc/mm: Only read faulting instruction when necessary in do_page_fault()

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

Contents

  [PATCH] powerpc/mm: Only read faulting instruction when necessary in  do_page_fault() Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> - 2017-04-24 10:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: Only read faulting instruction when necessary in do_page_fault() Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2017-04-24 11:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: Only read faulting instruction when necessary  in do_page_fault() Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> - 2017-04-24 12:30 +0200

#1629296 — [PATCH] powerpc/mm: Only read faulting instruction when necessary in do_page_fault()

Commit a7a9dcd882a67 ("powerpc: Avoid taking a data miss on every
userspace instruction miss") has shown that limiting the read of
faulting instruction to likely cases improves performance.

This patch goes further into this direction by limiting the read
of the faulting instruction to the only cases where it is definitly
needed.

On an MPC885, with the same benchmark app as in the commit referred
above, we see a reduction of 4000 dTLB misses (approx 3%):

Before the patch:
 Performance counter stats for './fault 500' (10 runs):

         720495838      cpu-cycles                                                    ( +-  0.04% )
            141769      dTLB-load-misses                                              ( +-  0.02% )
             52722      iTLB-load-misses                                              ( +-  0.01% )
             19611      faults                                                        ( +-  0.02% )

       5.750535176 seconds time elapsed                                          ( +-  0.16% )

With the patch:
 Performance counter stats for './fault 500' (10 runs):

         717669123      cpu-cycles                                                    ( +-  0.02% )
            137344      dTLB-load-misses                                              ( +-  0.03% )
             52731      iTLB-load-misses                                              ( +-  0.01% )
             19614      faults                                                        ( +-  0.03% )

       5.728423115 seconds time elapsed                                          ( +-  0.14% )

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
---
 This patch applies after the serie "powerpc/mm: some cleanup of do_page_fault()"

 arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
index 400f2d0d42f8..3d506589236c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
@@ -280,14 +280,6 @@ int do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
 
 	perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS, 1, regs, address);
 
-	/*
-	 * We want to do this outside mmap_sem, because reading code around nip
-	 * can result in fault, which will cause a deadlock when called with
-	 * mmap_sem held
-	 */
-	if (is_write && is_user)
-		__get_user(inst, (unsigned int __user *)regs->nip);
-
 	if (is_user)
 		flags |= FAULT_FLAG_USER;
 
@@ -356,8 +348,22 @@ int do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
 		 * between the last mapped region and the stack will
 		 * expand the stack rather than segfaulting.
 		 */
-		if (address + 2048 < uregs->gpr[1] && !store_updates_sp(inst))
-			goto bad_area;
+		if (address + 2048 < uregs->gpr[1]) {
+			if (!inst) {
+				/*
+				 * We want to do this outside mmap_sem, because
+				 * reading code around nip can result in fault,
+				 * which will cause a deadlock when called with
+				 * mmap_sem held
+				 */
+				up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+				__get_user(inst,
+					   (unsigned int __user *)regs->nip);
+				if (!store_updates_sp(inst))
+					goto bad_area_nosemaphore;
+				goto retry;
+			}
+		}
 	}
 	if (expand_stack(vma, address))
 		goto bad_area;
-- 
2.12.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1629341 — Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: Only read faulting instruction when necessary in do_page_fault()

Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> writes:

> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> index 400f2d0d42f8..3d506589236c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> @@ -356,8 +348,22 @@ int do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
>  		 * between the last mapped region and the stack will
>  		 * expand the stack rather than segfaulting.
>  		 */
> -		if (address + 2048 < uregs->gpr[1] && !store_updates_sp(inst))
> -			goto bad_area;
> +		if (address + 2048 < uregs->gpr[1]) {
> +			if (!inst) {

That looks like it could lead to an infinite loop, if the instruction
that caused the fault has been overwritten with NULL by another thread.

Or did I miss something? (I only read the diff)

> +				/*
> +				 * We want to do this outside mmap_sem, because
> +				 * reading code around nip can result in fault,
> +				 * which will cause a deadlock when called with
> +				 * mmap_sem held
> +				 */
> +				up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> +				__get_user(inst,
> +					   (unsigned int __user *)regs->nip);
> +				if (!store_updates_sp(inst))
> +					goto bad_area_nosemaphore;
> +				goto retry;
> +			}


cheers

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1629402 — Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: Only read faulting instruction when necessary in do_page_fault()

Le 24/04/2017 à 11:15, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> writes:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
>> index 400f2d0d42f8..3d506589236c 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
>> @@ -356,8 +348,22 @@ int do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
>>  		 * between the last mapped region and the stack will
>>  		 * expand the stack rather than segfaulting.
>>  		 */
>> -		if (address + 2048 < uregs->gpr[1] && !store_updates_sp(inst))
>> -			goto bad_area;
>> +		if (address + 2048 < uregs->gpr[1]) {
>> +			if (!inst) {
>
> That looks like it could lead to an infinite loop, if the instruction
> that caused the fault has been overwritten with NULL by another thread.

If the inst is NULL, store_updates_sp(inst) returns false so it jumps to 
bad_area_nosemaphore

Christophe

>
> Or did I miss something? (I only read the diff)
>
>> +				/*
>> +				 * We want to do this outside mmap_sem, because
>> +				 * reading code around nip can result in fault,
>> +				 * which will cause a deadlock when called with
>> +				 * mmap_sem held
>> +				 */
>> +				up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>> +				__get_user(inst,
>> +					   (unsigned int __user *)regs->nip);
>> +				if (!store_updates_sp(inst))
>> +					goto bad_area_nosemaphore;
>> +				goto retry;
>> +			}
>
>
> cheers
>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web