Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1628404 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-21 20:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-04-21 21:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: net/core: BUG in unregister_netdevice_many Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-04-21 20:20 +0200
Re: net/core: BUG in unregister_netdevice_many Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> - 2017-04-21 20:40 +0200
Re: net/core: BUG in unregister_netdevice_many David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-04-21 21:40 +0200
| From | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-21 20:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: net/core: BUG in unregister_netdevice_many |
| Message-ID | <tyLjX-Fc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> I'm assuming that the real cause is simply that "dev->reg_state" ends
> up being NETREG_UNREGISTERING or something. Maybe the BUG_ON() could
> be just removed, and replaced by the previous warning about
> NETREG_UNINITIALIZED.
>
> Something like the attached (TOTALLY UNTESTED) patch.
.. might as well test it.
That patch doesn't fix the problem, but it does show that yes, it was
NETREG_UNREGISTERING:
unregister_netdevice: device pim6reg/ffff962dc4606000 was not registered (2)
but then immediately afterwards we get
general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
Workqueue: netns cleanup_net
RIP: 0010:dev_shutdown+0xe/0xc0
Call Trace:
rollback_registered_many+0x2a5/0x440
unregister_netdevice_many+0x1e/0xb0
default_device_exit_batch+0x145/0x170
which is due to a
mov 0x388(%rdi),%eax
where %rdi is 0xdead000000000090. That is at the very beginning of
dev_shutdown, it's "dev" itself that has that value, so it comes from
(_another_) invocation of rollback_registered_many(), when it does
that
list_for_each_entry(dev, head, unreg_list) {
so it seems to be a case of another "list_del() leaves list in bad
state", and it was the added test for "dev->reg_state !=
NETREG_REGISTERED" that did that
list_del(&dev->unreg_list);
and left random contents in the unreg_list.
So that "handle error case" was almost certainly just buggy too.
And the bug seems to be that we're trying to unregister a netdevice
that has already been unregistered.
Over to Eric and networking people. This oops is user-triggerable, and
leaves the machine in a bad state (the original BUG_ON() and the new
GP fault both happen while holding the RTNL, so networking is not
healthy afterwards.
Linus
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-21 20:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tyLDj-LM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1628404 |
On 21/04/17 20:42, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> I'm assuming that the real cause is simply that "dev->reg_state" ends
>> up being NETREG_UNREGISTERING or something. Maybe the BUG_ON() could
>> be just removed, and replaced by the previous warning about
>> NETREG_UNINITIALIZED.
>>
>> Something like the attached (TOTALLY UNTESTED) patch.
>
> .. might as well test it.
>
> That patch doesn't fix the problem, but it does show that yes, it was
> NETREG_UNREGISTERING:
>
> unregister_netdevice: device pim6reg/ffff962dc4606000 was not registered (2)
>
> but then immediately afterwards we get
>
> general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> Workqueue: netns cleanup_net
> RIP: 0010:dev_shutdown+0xe/0xc0
> Call Trace:
> rollback_registered_many+0x2a5/0x440
> unregister_netdevice_many+0x1e/0xb0
> default_device_exit_batch+0x145/0x170
>
> which is due to a
>
> mov 0x388(%rdi),%eax
>
> where %rdi is 0xdead000000000090. That is at the very beginning of
> dev_shutdown, it's "dev" itself that has that value, so it comes from
> (_another_) invocation of rollback_registered_many(), when it does
> that
>
> list_for_each_entry(dev, head, unreg_list) {
>
> so it seems to be a case of another "list_del() leaves list in bad
> state", and it was the added test for "dev->reg_state !=
> NETREG_REGISTERED" that did that
>
> list_del(&dev->unreg_list);
>
> and left random contents in the unreg_list.
>
> So that "handle error case" was almost certainly just buggy too.
>
> And the bug seems to be that we're trying to unregister a netdevice
> that has already been unregistered.
>
> Over to Eric and networking people. This oops is user-triggerable, and
> leaves the machine in a bad state (the original BUG_ON() and the new
> GP fault both happen while holding the RTNL, so networking is not
> healthy afterwards.
>
> Linus
>
Right, I've already posted a patch for ip6mr that should fix the issue.
CCed you and LKML just now.
Thanks,
Nik
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-21 21:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tyMzo-1ke-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1628404 |
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:42:48 -0700 > Over to Eric and networking people. This oops is user-triggerable, and > leaves the machine in a bad state (the original BUG_ON() and the new > GP fault both happen while holding the RTNL, so networking is not > healthy afterwards. I have the fix in my tree and will push it to shortly.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web