Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1623780 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-14 19:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-04-17 10:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] arm64: allwinner: a64: enable Wi-Fi for Pine64 Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> - 2017-04-14 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] arm64: allwinner: a64: enable Wi-Fi for Pine64 Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-04-17 10:00 +0200
| From | Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 19:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] arm64: allwinner: a64: enable Wi-Fi for Pine64 |
| Message-ID | <twcJI-3tb-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi,
Am 07.04.2017 um 20:34 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
> The Wi-Fi modules of Pine64 is powered via DLDO4 and ELDO1 (the latter
"modules ... are" or "module ... is"
> one provides I/O voltage).
>
> Add device node for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pine64.dts | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pine64.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pine64.dts
> index 7da074f95065..9d90bb32aa87 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pine64.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pine64.dts
> @@ -64,6 +64,11 @@
> regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> };
> +
> + wifi_pwrseq: wifi_pwrseq {
> + compatible = "mmc-pwrseq-simple";
> + reset-gpios = <&r_pio 0 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; /* PL2 */
> + };
> };
>
> &ehci1 {
> @@ -91,6 +96,17 @@
> status = "okay";
> };
>
> +&mmc1 {
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&mmc1_pins>;
> + vmmc-supply = <®_dldo4>;
> + vqmmc-supply = <®_eldo1>;
> + mmc-pwrseq = <&wifi_pwrseq>;
> + non-removable;
> + bus-width = <4>;
> + status = "okay";
> +};
As you mention above, Wi-Fi is a module, so may be absent. Is it really
correct to enable this node and hardcode a certain power sequence? In
theory other modules could be attached.
To me that calls for an overlay instead.
> +
> &ohci1 {
> status = "okay";
> };
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-17 10:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tx9JM-6so-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1623780 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 06:56:16PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > one provides I/O voltage).
> >
> > Add device node for it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pine64.dts | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pine64.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pine64.dts
> > index 7da074f95065..9d90bb32aa87 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pine64.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pine64.dts
> > @@ -64,6 +64,11 @@
> > regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> > regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> > };
> > +
> > + wifi_pwrseq: wifi_pwrseq {
> > + compatible = "mmc-pwrseq-simple";
> > + reset-gpios = <&r_pio 0 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; /* PL2 */
> > + };
> > };
> >
> > &ehci1 {
> > @@ -91,6 +96,17 @@
> > status = "okay";
> > };
> >
> > +&mmc1 {
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&mmc1_pins>;
> > + vmmc-supply = <®_dldo4>;
> > + vqmmc-supply = <®_eldo1>;
> > + mmc-pwrseq = <&wifi_pwrseq>;
> > + non-removable;
> > + bus-width = <4>;
> > + status = "okay";
> > +};
>
> As you mention above, Wi-Fi is a module, so may be absent. Is it really
> correct to enable this node and hardcode a certain power sequence? In
> theory other modules could be attached.
>
> To me that calls for an overlay instead.
Agreed.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web