Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1621949 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-12 11:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-04-13 07:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] thermal: core: Allow orderly_poweroff to be called only once Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> - 2017-04-12 11:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] thermal: core: Allow orderly_poweroff to be called only once Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 07:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] thermal: core: Allow orderly_poweroff to be called only once Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> - 2017-04-13 07:20 +0200
| From | Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-12 11:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] thermal: core: Allow orderly_poweroff to be called only once |
| Message-ID | <tvmBr-2Gr-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
thermal_zone_device_check --> thermal_zone_device_update -->
handle_thermal_trip --> handle_critical_trips --> orderly_poweroff
The above sequence happens every 250/500 mS based on the configuration.
The orderly_poweroff function is getting called every 250/500 mS.
With a full fledged file system it takes at least 5-10 Seconds to
power off gracefully.
In that period due to the thermal_zone_device_check triggering
periodically the thermal work queues bombard with
orderly_poweroff calls multiple times eventually leading to
failures in gracefully powering off the system.
Make sure that orderly_poweroff is called only once.
Fixes: 0c01ebbfd3caf1d ("Thermal: Remove throttling logic out of thermal_sys.c")
Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
---
drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
index 11f0675..4e68ce0 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
@@ -326,6 +326,7 @@ static void handle_critical_trips(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
int trip, enum thermal_trip_type trip_type)
{
int trip_temp;
+ static bool power_off_triggered;
tz->ops->get_trip_temp(tz, trip, &trip_temp);
@@ -338,11 +339,12 @@ static void handle_critical_trips(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
if (tz->ops->notify)
tz->ops->notify(tz, trip, trip_type);
- if (trip_type == THERMAL_TRIP_CRITICAL) {
+ if (trip_type == THERMAL_TRIP_CRITICAL && !power_off_triggered) {
dev_emerg(&tz->device,
"critical temperature reached(%d C),shutting down\n",
tz->temperature / 1000);
orderly_poweroff(true);
+ power_off_triggered = true;
}
}
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 07:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] thermal: core: Allow orderly_poweroff to be called only once |
| Message-ID | <tvFb3-6zJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1621949 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hey,
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:42:12PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> thermal_zone_device_check --> thermal_zone_device_update -->
> handle_thermal_trip --> handle_critical_trips --> orderly_poweroff
>
> The above sequence happens every 250/500 mS based on the configuration.
> The orderly_poweroff function is getting called every 250/500 mS.
> With a full fledged file system it takes at least 5-10 Seconds to
> power off gracefully.
>
> In that period due to the thermal_zone_device_check triggering
> periodically the thermal work queues bombard with
> orderly_poweroff calls multiple times eventually leading to
> failures in gracefully powering off the system.
>
> Make sure that orderly_poweroff is called only once.
>
> Fixes: 0c01ebbfd3caf1d ("Thermal: Remove throttling logic out of thermal_sys.c")
Why? how the above commit introduced this issue?
> Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> index 11f0675..4e68ce0 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> @@ -326,6 +326,7 @@ static void handle_critical_trips(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> int trip, enum thermal_trip_type trip_type)
> {
> int trip_temp;
> + static bool power_off_triggered;
>
I am not convinced this change does what you say it does..
> tz->ops->get_trip_temp(tz, trip, &trip_temp);
>
> @@ -338,11 +339,12 @@ static void handle_critical_trips(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> if (tz->ops->notify)
> tz->ops->notify(tz, trip, trip_type);
>
> - if (trip_type == THERMAL_TRIP_CRITICAL) {
> + if (trip_type == THERMAL_TRIP_CRITICAL && !power_off_triggered) {
> dev_emerg(&tz->device,
> "critical temperature reached(%d C),shutting down\n",
> tz->temperature / 1000);
> orderly_poweroff(true);
Imagine you have two zones about to enter critical path. thermal zone 0
first gets into critical, and at this line (btween orderly_poweroff()
and you set your flag), it gets preempted. Then thermal zone 1 also
enters the critical path, then happens to be scheduled, you essentially
end up still calling orderly_poweroff() twice, which is what this patch
is supposed to avoid.
You better simply use a lock to serialize code execution.
BR,
> + power_off_triggered = true;
> }
> }
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 07:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] thermal: core: Allow orderly_poweroff to be called only once |
| Message-ID | <tvFkK-6Dv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1622716 |
On Thursday 13 April 2017 10:36 AM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:42:12PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> thermal_zone_device_check --> thermal_zone_device_update -->
>> handle_thermal_trip --> handle_critical_trips --> orderly_poweroff
>>
>> The above sequence happens every 250/500 mS based on the configuration.
>> The orderly_poweroff function is getting called every 250/500 mS.
>> With a full fledged file system it takes at least 5-10 Seconds to
>> power off gracefully.
>>
>> In that period due to the thermal_zone_device_check triggering
>> periodically the thermal work queues bombard with
>> orderly_poweroff calls multiple times eventually leading to
>> failures in gracefully powering off the system.
>>
>> Make sure that orderly_poweroff is called only once.
>>
>> Fixes: 0c01ebbfd3caf1d ("Thermal: Remove throttling logic out of thermal_sys.c")
>
> Why? how the above commit introduced this issue?
git blame showed me that. I can remove this. Let me know if you have the
right commit that introduced this.
>
>> Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
>> index 11f0675..4e68ce0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
>> @@ -326,6 +326,7 @@ static void handle_critical_trips(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
>> int trip, enum thermal_trip_type trip_type)
>> {
>> int trip_temp;
>> + static bool power_off_triggered;
>>
>
> I am not convinced this change does what you say it does..
>
>> tz->ops->get_trip_temp(tz, trip, &trip_temp);
>>
>> @@ -338,11 +339,12 @@ static void handle_critical_trips(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
>> if (tz->ops->notify)
>> tz->ops->notify(tz, trip, trip_type);
>>
>> - if (trip_type == THERMAL_TRIP_CRITICAL) {
>> + if (trip_type == THERMAL_TRIP_CRITICAL && !power_off_triggered) {
>> dev_emerg(&tz->device,
>> "critical temperature reached(%d C),shutting down\n",
>> tz->temperature / 1000);
>> orderly_poweroff(true);
>
> Imagine you have two zones about to enter critical path. thermal zone 0
> first gets into critical, and at this line (btween orderly_poweroff()
> and you set your flag), it gets preempted. Then thermal zone 1 also
> enters the critical path, then happens to be scheduled, you essentially
> end up still calling orderly_poweroff() twice, which is what this patch
> is supposed to avoid.
>
> You better simply use a lock to serialize code execution.
Okay understood. Will do it in the next version.
>
> BR,
>
>> + power_off_triggered = true;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web