Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1623411 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-14 01:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-04-14 12:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH v3] ftrace/x86/32: fix triple fault with graph tracing and suspend-to-ram Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2017-04-14 01:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] ftrace/x86/32: fix triple fault with graph tracing and suspend-to-ram Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-04-14 01:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] ftrace/x86/32: fix triple fault with graph tracing and suspend-to-ram Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2017-04-14 04:20 +0200
[tip:x86/urgent] ftrace/x86: Fix triple fault with graph tracing and suspend-to-ram tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-04-14 12:00 +0200
| From | Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 01:00 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v3] ftrace/x86/32: fix triple fault with graph tracing and suspend-to-ram |
| Message-ID | <tvVSx-1a3-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On x86-32, with CONFIG_FIRMWARE and multiple CPUs, if you enable
function graph tracing and then suspend to RAM, it will triple fault and
reboot when it resumes.
The first fault happens when booting a secondary CPU:
startup_32_smp()
load_ucode_ap()
prepare_ftrace_return()
ftrace_graph_is_dead()
(accesses 'kill_ftrace_graph')
The early head_32.S code calls into load_ucode_ap(), which has an an
ftrace hook, so it calls prepare_ftrace_return(), which calls
ftrace_graph_is_dead(), which tries to access the global
'kill_ftrace_graph' variable with a virtual address, causing a fault
because the CPU is still in real mode.
The fix is to add a check in prepare_ftrace_return() to make sure it's
running in protected mode before continuing. The check makes sure the
stack pointer is a virtual kernel address. It's a bit of a hack, but
it's not very intrusive and it works well enough.
For reference, here are a few other (more difficult) ways this could
have potentially been fixed:
- Move startup_32_smp()'s call to load_ucode_ap() down to *after* paging
is enabled. (No idea what that would break.)
- Track down load_ucode_ap()'s entire callee tree and mark all the
functions 'notrace'. (Probably not realistic.)
- Pause graph tracing in ftrace_suspend_notifier_call() or bringup_cpu()
or __cpu_up(), and ensure that the pause facility can be queried from
real mode.
Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Tested-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
---
v3: Added Tested-by: and Cc:stable tags
arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
index 9dd546b..a3adf1f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -995,6 +995,18 @@ void prepare_ftrace_return(unsigned long self_addr, unsigned long *parent,
unsigned long return_hooker = (unsigned long)
&return_to_handler;
+ /*
+ * When resuming from suspend-to-ram, this function can be indirectly
+ * called from early CPU startup code while the CPU is in real mode,
+ * which would fail miserably. Make sure the stack pointer is a
+ * virtual address.
+ *
+ * This check isn't as accurate as virt_addr_valid(), but it should be
+ * good enough for this purpose, and it's fast.
+ */
+ if (unlikely((long)__builtin_frame_address(0) >= 0))
+ return;
+
if (unlikely(ftrace_graph_is_dead()))
return;
--
2.7.4
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 01:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] ftrace/x86/32: fix triple fault with graph tracing and suspend-to-ram |
| Message-ID | <tvW2d-1tc-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1623411 |
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 17:53:55 -0500 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote: > On x86-32, with CONFIG_FIRMWARE and multiple CPUs, if you enable > function graph tracing and then suspend to RAM, it will triple fault and > reboot when it resumes. > > The first fault happens when booting a secondary CPU: > > startup_32_smp() > load_ucode_ap() > prepare_ftrace_return() > ftrace_graph_is_dead() > (accesses 'kill_ftrace_graph') > > The early head_32.S code calls into load_ucode_ap(), which has an an > ftrace hook, so it calls prepare_ftrace_return(), which calls > ftrace_graph_is_dead(), which tries to access the global > 'kill_ftrace_graph' variable with a virtual address, causing a fault > because the CPU is still in real mode. > > The fix is to add a check in prepare_ftrace_return() to make sure it's > running in protected mode before continuing. The check makes sure the > stack pointer is a virtual kernel address. It's a bit of a hack, but > it's not very intrusive and it works well enough. > > For reference, here are a few other (more difficult) ways this could > have potentially been fixed: > > - Move startup_32_smp()'s call to load_ucode_ap() down to *after* paging > is enabled. (No idea what that would break.) > > - Track down load_ucode_ap()'s entire callee tree and mark all the > functions 'notrace'. (Probably not realistic.) > > - Pause graph tracing in ftrace_suspend_notifier_call() or bringup_cpu() > or __cpu_up(), and ensure that the pause facility can be queried from > real mode. > > Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> > Tested-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> > Cc: stable@kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> This is pretty much the same thing we were talking about before, right? If so, then: Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> if not, I need to spend more time reviewing it ;-) -- Steve > --- > v3: Added Tested-by: and Cc:stable tags > > arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c > index 9dd546b..a3adf1f 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c > @@ -995,6 +995,18 @@ void prepare_ftrace_return(unsigned long self_addr, unsigned long *parent, > unsigned long return_hooker = (unsigned long) > &return_to_handler; > > + /* > + * When resuming from suspend-to-ram, this function can be indirectly > + * called from early CPU startup code while the CPU is in real mode, > + * which would fail miserably. Make sure the stack pointer is a > + * virtual address. > + * > + * This check isn't as accurate as virt_addr_valid(), but it should be > + * good enough for this purpose, and it's fast. > + */ > + if (unlikely((long)__builtin_frame_address(0) >= 0)) > + return; > + > if (unlikely(ftrace_graph_is_dead())) > return; >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 04:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] ftrace/x86/32: fix triple fault with graph tracing and suspend-to-ram |
| Message-ID | <tvZ05-3xy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1623414 |
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 07:02:36PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 17:53:55 -0500 > Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On x86-32, with CONFIG_FIRMWARE and multiple CPUs, if you enable > > function graph tracing and then suspend to RAM, it will triple fault and > > reboot when it resumes. > > > > The first fault happens when booting a secondary CPU: > > > > startup_32_smp() > > load_ucode_ap() > > prepare_ftrace_return() > > ftrace_graph_is_dead() > > (accesses 'kill_ftrace_graph') > > > > The early head_32.S code calls into load_ucode_ap(), which has an an > > ftrace hook, so it calls prepare_ftrace_return(), which calls > > ftrace_graph_is_dead(), which tries to access the global > > 'kill_ftrace_graph' variable with a virtual address, causing a fault > > because the CPU is still in real mode. > > > > The fix is to add a check in prepare_ftrace_return() to make sure it's > > running in protected mode before continuing. The check makes sure the > > stack pointer is a virtual kernel address. It's a bit of a hack, but > > it's not very intrusive and it works well enough. > > > > For reference, here are a few other (more difficult) ways this could > > have potentially been fixed: > > > > - Move startup_32_smp()'s call to load_ucode_ap() down to *after* paging > > is enabled. (No idea what that would break.) > > > > - Track down load_ucode_ap()'s entire callee tree and mark all the > > functions 'notrace'. (Probably not realistic.) > > > > - Pause graph tracing in ftrace_suspend_notifier_call() or bringup_cpu() > > or __cpu_up(), and ensure that the pause facility can be queried from > > real mode. > > > > Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> > > Tested-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> > > Cc: stable@kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> > > This is pretty much the same thing we were talking about before, right? Yeah, the same patch from before, now with more tags! > If so, then: > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Thanks! -- Josh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf <tipbot@zytor.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-14 12:00 +0200 |
| Subject | [tip:x86/urgent] ftrace/x86: Fix triple fault with graph tracing and suspend-to-ram |
| Message-ID | <tw6bf-7Xo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1623411 |
Commit-ID: 34a477e5297cbaa6ecc6e17c042a866e1cbe80d6
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/34a477e5297cbaa6ecc6e17c042a866e1cbe80d6
Author: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 17:53:55 -0500
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 11:48:51 +0200
ftrace/x86: Fix triple fault with graph tracing and suspend-to-ram
On x86-32, with CONFIG_FIRMWARE and multiple CPUs, if you enable function
graph tracing and then suspend to RAM, it will triple fault and reboot when
it resumes.
The first fault happens when booting a secondary CPU:
startup_32_smp()
load_ucode_ap()
prepare_ftrace_return()
ftrace_graph_is_dead()
(accesses 'kill_ftrace_graph')
The early head_32.S code calls into load_ucode_ap(), which has an an
ftrace hook, so it calls prepare_ftrace_return(), which calls
ftrace_graph_is_dead(), which tries to access the global
'kill_ftrace_graph' variable with a virtual address, causing a fault
because the CPU is still in real mode.
The fix is to add a check in prepare_ftrace_return() to make sure it's
running in protected mode before continuing. The check makes sure the
stack pointer is a virtual kernel address. It's a bit of a hack, but
it's not very intrusive and it works well enough.
For reference, here are a few other (more difficult) ways this could
have potentially been fixed:
- Move startup_32_smp()'s call to load_ucode_ap() down to *after* paging
is enabled. (No idea what that would break.)
- Track down load_ucode_ap()'s entire callee tree and mark all the
functions 'notrace'. (Probably not realistic.)
- Pause graph tracing in ftrace_suspend_notifier_call() or bringup_cpu()
or __cpu_up(), and ensure that the pause facility can be queried from
real mode.
Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5c1272269a580660703ed2eccf44308e790c7a98.1492123841.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
index cbd73eb..0e5ceac 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -989,6 +989,18 @@ void prepare_ftrace_return(unsigned long self_addr, unsigned long *parent,
unsigned long return_hooker = (unsigned long)
&return_to_handler;
+ /*
+ * When resuming from suspend-to-ram, this function can be indirectly
+ * called from early CPU startup code while the CPU is in real mode,
+ * which would fail miserably. Make sure the stack pointer is a
+ * virtual address.
+ *
+ * This check isn't as accurate as virt_addr_valid(), but it should be
+ * good enough for this purpose, and it's fast.
+ */
+ if (unlikely((long)__builtin_frame_address(0) >= 0))
+ return;
+
if (unlikely(ftrace_graph_is_dead()))
return;
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web