Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1615729 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-04 08:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-04-10 10:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 7 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-04-04 08:50 +0200
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2017-04-04 10:20 +0200
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2017-04-04 10:30 +0200
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2017-04-04 14:40 +0200
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-04-10 04:20 +0200
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2017-04-10 09:00 +0200
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-04-10 10:00 +0200
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 08:50 +0200 |
| Subject | linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree |
| Message-ID | <tsqrU-1eL-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Lee,
After merging the mfd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
/home/sfr/next/next/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c:25:31: fatal error: asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h: No such file or directory
Caused by commit
eb2a445f7d8f ("mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Fix a mess with compilation units")
I have reverted that commit for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 10:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tsrQZ-2hX-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1615729 |
On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> After merging the mfd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> /home/sfr/next/next/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c:25:31: fatal error: asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h: No such file or directory
>
> Caused by commit
>
> eb2a445f7d8f ("mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Fix a mess with compilation units")
>
> I have reverted that commit for today.
Andy,
I'm pulling this commit. Despite you thinking the error is unrelated
to your patch, something is clearly wrong and I don't have time to
investigate.
Ball is in your court.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 10:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tss0G-2lg-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1615770 |
On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi Lee,
> >
> > After merging the mfd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > /home/sfr/next/next/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c:25:31: fatal error: asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h: No such file or directory
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > eb2a445f7d8f ("mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Fix a mess with compilation units")
> >
> > I have reverted that commit for today.
>
> Andy,
>
> I'm pulling this commit. Despite you thinking the error is unrelated
> to your patch, something is clearly wrong and I don't have time to
> investigate.
>
> Ball is in your court.
Okay, I've had a *very* quick looks.
Seems as if you should be depending on INTEL_PMC_IPC.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tsvUC-4Rz-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1615777 |
On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 09:21 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Lee,
> > >
> > > After merging the mfd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> > >
> > > /home/sfr/next/next/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c:25:31:
> > > fatal error: asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h: No such file or directory
> > >
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > > eb2a445f7d8f ("mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Fix a mess with compilation
> > > units")
> > >
> > > I have reverted that commit for today.
> >
> > Andy,
> >
> > I'm pulling this commit. Despite you thinking the error is
> > unrelated
> > to your patch, something is clearly wrong and I don't have time to
> > investigate.
> >
> > Ball is in your court.
>
> Okay, I've had a *very* quick looks.
> Seems as if you should be depending on INTEL_PMC_IPC.
As a quick fix, yes. As a proper fix the PMC/SCU mess should be fixed in
a way to provide a header in include/platform_data/x86.
I will prepare v4.
Thanks.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-10 04:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tux5U-2WR-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1615983 |
Hi all,
On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 15:31:15 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 09:21 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > > After merging the mfd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> > > >
> > > > /home/sfr/next/next/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c:25:31:
> > > > fatal error: asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h: No such file or directory
> > > >
> > > > Caused by commit
> > > >
> > > > eb2a445f7d8f ("mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Fix a mess with compilation
> > > > units")
> > > >
> > > > I have reverted that commit for today.
> > >
> > > Andy,
> > >
> > > I'm pulling this commit. Despite you thinking the error is unrelated
> > > to your patch, something is clearly wrong and I don't have time to
> > > investigate.
> > >
> > > Ball is in your court.
> >
> > Okay, I've had a *very* quick looks.
>
> > Seems as if you should be depending on INTEL_PMC_IPC.
>
> As a quick fix, yes. As a proper fix the PMC/SCU mess should be fixed in
> a way to provide a header in include/platform_data/x86.
>
> I will prepare v4.
> Thanks.
Ping?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-10 09:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tuBsR-5Eh-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1619597 |
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 15:31:15 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 09:21 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Lee Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > After merging the mfd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > > > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> > > > >
> > > > > /home/sfr/next/next/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c:25:31:
> > > > > fatal error: asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h: No such file or directory
> > > > >
> > > > > Caused by commit
> > > > >
> > > > > eb2a445f7d8f ("mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Fix a mess with compilation
> > > > > units")
> > > > >
> > > > > I have reverted that commit for today.
> > > >
> > > > Andy,
> > > >
> > > > I'm pulling this commit. Despite you thinking the error is unrelated
> > > > to your patch, something is clearly wrong and I don't have time to
> > > > investigate.
> > > >
> > > > Ball is in your court.
> > >
> > > Okay, I've had a *very* quick looks.
> >
> > > Seems as if you should be depending on INTEL_PMC_IPC.
> >
> > As a quick fix, yes. As a proper fix the PMC/SCU mess should be fixed in
> > a way to provide a header in include/platform_data/x86.
> >
> > I will prepare v4.
> > Thanks.
>
> Ping?
I guess this is still causing an issue in -next?
The patch has now been removed from mfd-next and the result pushed.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-10 10:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tuCoV-6gF-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1619665 |
Hi Lee, On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 07:55:52 +0100 Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > > I guess this is still causing an issue in -next? Yeah. > The patch has now been removed from mfd-next and the result pushed. Thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web