Groups > linux.kernel > #1619467 > unrolled thread

patch to candidate for stable kernel 4.10

Started by	"Mkrtchyan, Tigran" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
First post	2017-04-09 11:50 +0200
Last post	2017-04-09 21:20 +0200
Articles	2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

  patch to candidate for stable kernel 4.10 "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de> - 2017-04-09 11:50 +0200
    Re: patch to candidate for stable kernel 4.10 Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-04-09 21:20 +0200

#1619467 — patch to candidate for stable kernel 4.10

From	"Mkrtchyan, Tigran" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
Date	2017-04-09 11:50 +0200
Subject	patch to candidate for stable kernel 4.10
Message-ID	<tuhDP-12y-1@gated-at.bofh.it>

Dear stable kernel maintainers,

Please consider commit

f17f8a14e82cdf34cd6473e3644f3c672b3884f6

to be included into 4.10 kernel. As long as it crashes 
kernels used by some distors, we have to disable corresponding
functionality on the NFS servers. 

Thanks in advance,
   Tigran.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1619535

From	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date	2017-04-09 21:20 +0200
Message-ID	<tuqxr-77t-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to	#1619467

On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 11:36:30AM +0200, Mkrtchyan, Tigran wrote:
> 
> Dear stable kernel maintainers,
> 
> Please consider commit
> 
> f17f8a14e82cdf34cd6473e3644f3c672b3884f6
> 
> to be included into 4.10 kernel. As long as it crashes 
> kernels used by some distors, we have to disable corresponding
> functionality on the NFS servers. 

So just for 4.10?  Nothing older?

What does the NFS maintainer say?

thanks,

greg k-h

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

csiph-web

patch to candidate for stable kernel 4.10

Contents

#1619467 — patch to candidate for stable kernel 4.10

#1619535