Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1620746 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2] cfg80211: Fix array-bounds warning in fragment copy

Started byMatthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
First post2017-04-10 23:40 +0200
Last post2017-04-11 07:20 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2] cfg80211: Fix array-bounds warning in fragment copy Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> - 2017-04-10 23:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] cfg80211: Fix array-bounds warning in fragment copy Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> - 2017-04-11 07:20 +0200

#1620746 — Re: [PATCH v2] cfg80211: Fix array-bounds warning in fragment copy

FromMatthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Date2017-04-10 23:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] cfg80211: Fix array-bounds warning in fragment copy
Message-ID<tuPcu-6jI-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
El Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58:22PM -0700 Matthias Kaehlcke ha dit:

> __ieee80211_amsdu_copy_frag intentionally initializes a pointer to
> array[-1] to increment it later to valid values. clang rightfully
> generates an array-bounds warning on the initialization statement.
> 
> Initialize the pointer to array[0] and change the algorithm from
> increment before to increment after consume.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
> ---
>  net/wireless/util.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/wireless/util.c b/net/wireless/util.c
> index 68e5f2ecee1a..52795ae5337f 100644
> --- a/net/wireless/util.c
> +++ b/net/wireless/util.c
> @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ __ieee80211_amsdu_copy_frag(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sk_buff *frame,
>  			    int offset, int len)
>  {
>  	struct skb_shared_info *sh = skb_shinfo(skb);
> -	const skb_frag_t *frag = &sh->frags[-1];
> +	const skb_frag_t *frag = &sh->frags[0];
>  	struct page *frag_page;
>  	void *frag_ptr;
>  	int frag_len, frag_size;
> @@ -672,10 +672,10 @@ __ieee80211_amsdu_copy_frag(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sk_buff *frame,
>  
>  	while (offset >= frag_size) {
>  		offset -= frag_size;
> -		frag++;
>  		frag_page = skb_frag_page(frag);
>  		frag_ptr = skb_frag_address(frag);
>  		frag_size = skb_frag_size(frag);
> +		frag++;
>  	}
>  
>  	frag_ptr += offset;
> @@ -687,12 +687,12 @@ __ieee80211_amsdu_copy_frag(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sk_buff *frame,
>  	len -= cur_len;
>  
>  	while (len > 0) {
> -		frag++;
>  		frag_len = skb_frag_size(frag);
>  		cur_len = min(len, frag_len);
>  		__frame_add_frag(frame, skb_frag_page(frag),
>  				 skb_frag_address(frag), cur_len, frag_len);
>  		len -= cur_len;
> +		frag++;
>  	}
>  }
>  

Ping, any feedback on this patch?

Thanks

Matthias

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1620912

FromJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date2017-04-11 07:20 +0200
Message-ID<tuWnD-2G5-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1620746
On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 14:36 -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Ping, any feedback on this patch?

You didn't cc linux-wireless, so it fell through the cracks ... I'll
try to remember it when I merge later.

johannes

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web