Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1618645 > unrolled thread

[PATCH V3 1/4] pwm: tegra: Use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL() instead of local implementation

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  [PATCH V3 1/4] pwm: tegra: Use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL() instead of local implementation Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2017-04-07 12:00 +0200

#1618645 — [PATCH V3 1/4] pwm: tegra: Use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL() instead of local implementation

Use macro DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL() for 64bit division to closest one
instead of implementing the same locally. This increase readability.

Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>

---
Changes from v1:
- None

Changes from V2:
- Fix typo in commit message.
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c
index e464784..0a688da 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c
@@ -85,8 +85,7 @@ static int tegra_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	 * nearest integer during division.
 	 */
 	c *= (1 << PWM_DUTY_WIDTH);
-	c += period_ns / 2;
-	do_div(c, period_ns);
+	c = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(c, period_ns);
 
 	val = (u32)c << PWM_DUTY_SHIFT;
 
-- 
2.1.4

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web