Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1617921 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH -v6 04/13] futex,rt_mutex: Provide futex specific rt_mutex API

Started byPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
First post2017-04-06 14:20 +0200
Last post2017-04-06 19:10 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH -v6 04/13] futex,rt_mutex: Provide futex specific  rt_mutex API Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-06 14:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH -v6 04/13] futex,rt_mutex: Provide futex specific  rt_mutex API Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2017-04-06 19:10 +0200

#1617921 — Re: [PATCH -v6 04/13] futex,rt_mutex: Provide futex specific rt_mutex API

FromPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date2017-04-06 14:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH -v6 04/13] futex,rt_mutex: Provide futex specific rt_mutex API
Message-ID<tteym-8ob-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 05:37:02PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> 
> But, Peter are you testing this with anything in particular?

Testing? :-)

I ran some of the futex pi tests we have, and have a slightly modified
kernel+version of pi_stress to trigger more funnies.

Other than that Sebastian ran various versions through -rt and their
customer workloads (and found bugs).

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1618200

FromDarren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Date2017-04-06 19:10 +0200
Message-ID<ttj50-3IL-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1617921
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 02:15:05PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 05:37:02PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > 
> > But, Peter are you testing this with anything in particular?
> 
> Testing? :-)
> 
> I ran some of the futex pi tests we have, and have a slightly modified
> kernel+version of pi_stress to trigger more funnies.
> 
> Other than that Sebastian ran various versions through -rt and their
> customer workloads (and found bugs).
> 

OK, that's more or less what I assumed, but wanted to confirm. I'm bubbling up
the futex torture test suite on my priority list (now that I find myself with a
lot more time available for this stuff) \o/

-- 
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web